Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Framing messages about weight discrimination: impact on public support for legislation

International Journal of Obesity volume 35, pages 863–872 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

To assess the public support for potential legislation to prohibit weight-based discrimination against obese individuals in the United States, and to examine whether certain message frames about weight discrimination influence public support.

Design:

Participants were randomly assigned to read one of the four paragraphs that framed the topic of weight discrimination in a distinct way (or a control condition with no paragraph). Participants were then asked to indicate their level of support for six antidiscrimination laws.

Subjects:

A national sample of 1114 participants (48% women, 52% men), mean age 44.78 years (s.d.=15.93).

Results:

There was moderate support for several laws to prohibit weight-based discrimination, but gender differences were observed across experimental conditions indicating that some message frames may increase support for certain laws among women, but not men. However, message frames had no effect on support for laws with specific provisions to prohibit weight discrimination in the workplace, suggesting that public support for these particular legal measures is consistent and high (65% of men and 81% of women expressed support) regardless of how the issue of weight discrimination is framed to the public.

Conclusion:

The present findings provide evidence of current levels of public support for legislation to prohibit weight-based discrimination, and offer potential ways for policy makers and interest groups to communicate messages about weight discrimination in efforts to increase support.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Puhl RM, Brownell KD . Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obes Res 2001; 9: 788–905.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Puhl RM, Heuer CA . The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity 2009; 17: 941–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andreyeva T, Puhl RM, Brownell KD . Changes in perceived weight discrimination among Americans: 1995-1996 through 2004-2006. Obesity 2008; 16: 1129–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Puhl RM, Andreyeva T, Brownell KD . Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. Int J Obes 2008; 32: 992–1000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Crandall CS . Prejudice against fat people: ideology and self-interest. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994; 66: 882–894.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Crandall CS, Martinez R . Culture, ideology, and anti-fat attitudes. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1996; 22: 1165–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crandall CS, Schiffhauer KL . Anti-fat prejudice: beliefs, values, and American culture. Obes Res 1998; 6: 458–460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weiner B, Perry RP, Magnusson J . An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988; 55: 738–748.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Puhl RM, Latner JD . Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation's children. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 557–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vartanian LR, Shaprow JG . Effects of weight stigma on exercise motivation and behavior: a preliminary investigation among college-aged females. J Health Psychol 2008; 13: 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Puhl RM, Heuer CA . Obesity stigma: important considerations for public health. Am J Public Health 2010; 100: 1019–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Puhl RM, Brownell KD . Confronting and coping with weight stigma: an investigation of overweight and obese adults. Obesity 2006; 14: 1802–1815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roehling MV, Roehling PV, Pichler S . The relationship between body weight and perceived weight-related employment discrimination: the role of sex and race. J Vocat Behav 2007; 71: 300–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carr D, Friedman MA . Is obesity stigmatizing? body weight, perceived discrimination, and psychological well-being in the United States. J Health Soc Behav 2005; 46: 244–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rudolph CW, Wells CL, Weller MD, Baltes BB . A meta-analysis of empirical studies of weight-based bias in the workplace. J Vocat Behav 2009; 74: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roehling MV, Pilcher S, Oswald F, Bruce T . The effects of weight bias on job-related outcomes: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. In: Academy of Management Annual Meeting. Anahiem: CA, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  17. O’Brien KS, Halberstadt J, Hunter JA, Anderson J, Caputi P . Do antifat attitudes predict antifat behaviors? Obesity 2008; (Suppl 2): S87–S92.

  18. Baum CL, Ford WF . The wage effects of obesity: a longitudinal study. Health Econ 2004; 13: 885–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cawley J . The impact of obesity on wages. J Human Resour 2004; 39: 451–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maranto CL, Stenoien AF . Weight discrimination: a multidisciplinary analysis. Employee Responsibilities Rights J 2000; 12: 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Klarenbach S, Padwal R, Chuck A, Jacobs P . Population-based analysis of obesity a workforce participation. Obesity 2006; 14: 920–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tunceli K, Kemeng L, Williams LK . Long-term effects of obesity on employment and work limitations among U.S. adults 1986-1999. Obesity 2006; 14: 1637–1646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Daníelsdóttir S, O’Brien KS, Ciao A . Anti-fat prejudice reduction: a review of published studies. Obes Facts 2010; 3: 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Theran EE . Legal theory on weight discrimination. In: Brownell KD, Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, Rudd L, (eds). Weight Bias: Nature, Consequences, and Remedies. Guilford Press: New York, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pomeranz JL . A historical analysis of public health, the law, and stigmatized social groups: the need for both obesity and weight bias legislation. Obesity 2008; 16: S93–S102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kirkland A . Fat rights: Dilemmas of Difference and Personhood. New York University Press: New York, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Puhl RM, Heuer CA . Public opinion about laws to prohibit weight discrimination in the United States. Obesity (silver spring) 2010, (e-pub ahead of print 27 May 2010), PMID: 20508626.

  28. Barry CL, Brescoll VL, Brownell KD, Schlesinger M . Obesity metaphors: how beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy. Milbank Q 2009; 87: 7–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Oliver JE, Lee T . Public opinion and the politics of obesity in America. J Health Polit Policy Law 2005; 30: 923–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tversky A, Kahneman D . Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974; 185: 1124–1131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tversky A, Kahneman D . The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981; 211: 453–458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity. Weight bias: A Social Justice Issue: A Policy Brief, 2009, http://www.yaleruddcenter.org/resources/upload/docs/what/reports/RuddBriefWeightBias2009.pdf (accessed 12 June, 2010).

  33. National Association to Advance Fat Acceptance. NAAFA Size Diversity Toolkit, 2009.

  34. First do no harm: real stories of fat prejudice in health care. (accessed 4 May, 2010, at http://fathealth.wordpress.com/).

  35. Associated Press. AMA objects to calling obesity a disability. 16 June 2009. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31395226/ (accessed 20 July, 2010).

  36. Obesity Action Coalition. Statement on Obesity as a Disability. 17 June, 2009. http://www.obesityaction.org/news/2009/Statement%20from%20Obesity%20Action%20Coalition%20Executive%20Director%20Joseph%20Nadglowski%20%20June%2017,%202009.pdf (accessed 20 August, 2010).

  37. Brownell KD, Kersh R, Ludwig DS, Post RC, Puhl RM, Schwartz MB et al. Personal responsibility and obesity: a constructive approach to a controversial issue. Health Aff 2010; 29: 379–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lawrence RG . Framing obesity: the evolution of news discourse on a public health issue. Int J Press/Politics 2004; 9: 56–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim S-H, Willis LA . Talking about obesity: news framing of who is responsible for causing and fixing the problem. J Health Commun 2007; 12: 359–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bonfiglioli MF, Smith BJ, King LA, Chapman SF, Holding SJ . Choice and voice: obesity debates in television news. Med J Aust 2007; 187: 442–445.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Franz MJ, VanWormer JJ, Crain AL, Boucher JL, Histon T, Caplan W et al. Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimus 1-year follow-up. J Am Diet Assoc 2007; 107: 1755–1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Powell LH, Calvin JE, Calvin JE . Effective obesity treatments. Am Psychol 2007; 62: 234–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mann T, Tomiyama AJ, Westling E, Lew A-M, Samuels B, Chatman J . Medicare's search for effective obesity treatments. Am Psychol 2007; 62: 220–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tsai AG, Wadden TA . Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 56–66.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Oranzo AJ, Scott JG . Diagnosis and treatment of obesity in adults: an applied evidence-based review. J Am Board Fam Pract 2004; 17: 359–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Haidt J, Graham J . When morality opposes justice: conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Soc Justice Res 2007; 20: 1573–6725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Crandall CS . Ideology and lay theories of stigma: the justification of stigmatization. In: Heatherton TF, Kleck RE, Hebl MR, Hull JG, (eds). The Social Psychology of Stigma. Guilford Press: New York, 2000; 126–152.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Puhl RM, Brownell KD . Ways of coping with obesity stigma: conceptual review and analysis. Eating Behav 2003; 4: 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Schwartz MB, Vartanian LR, Nosek BA, Brownell KD . The influence of one's own body weight on implicit and explicit anti-fat bias. Obesity 2006; 14: 440–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Crandall CS, Biernat M . The ideology of anti-fat attitudes. J Appl Soc Psychol 1990; 20: 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Crandall CS, D’Anello S, Sakalli N, Lazarus E, Nejtardt GW, Feather NT . An attribution-value model of prejudice: anti-fat attitudes in six nations. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2001; 27: 30–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Puhl RM, Brownell KD . Psychosocial origins of obesity stigma: toward changing a powerful and pervasive bias. Obes Rev 2003; 4: 213–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Defining overweight obesity 2008 (accessed 18 November, 2008, at http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/defining.htm).

  54. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM . Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004. JAMA 2006; 295: 1549–1555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Puhl RM, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD . Impact of perceived consensus on stereotypes about obese people: a new approach for reducing bias. Health Psychol 2005; 24: 517–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Puhl RM, Heuer CA . Framing messages related to weight discrimination. unpublished manuscript.

  57. Puhl RM, Moss-Racusin CA, Schwartz MB . Internalization of weight bias: implications for binge eating and emotional well-being. Obesity 2007; 15: 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Durso LE, Latner JD . Understanding self-directed stigma: development of the weight bias internalization scale. Obesity 2008; 16: S80–S86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Gorber SC, Tremblay M, Moher D, Gorber B . A comparison of direct vs self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: A systematic review. Obes Rev 2007; 9: 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity at the Yale University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    R M Puhl, C Heuer & V Sarda

Authors
  1. R M Puhl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C Heuer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V Sarda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R M Puhl.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Puhl, R., Heuer, C. & Sarda, V. Framing messages about weight discrimination: impact on public support for legislation. Int J Obes 35, 863–872 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2010.194

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2010.194

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links