TABLE 3
FROM:
No effect of a diet with a reduced glycaemic index on satiety, energy intake and body weight in overweight and obese women
L M Aston, C S Stokes and S A Jebb
BACK TO ARTICLETable 3. Effect of dietary intervention on body weight and composition (n=19)
| Baseline | High GI diet | Low GI diet | Difference | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | s.d. | Mean | s.d. | Mean | s.d. | Mean | s.e. | 95% CI | P | |
| Weight (kg) | 87.5 | 15.0 | 89.2 | 16.1 | 89.1 | 15.6 | -0.1 | 0.5 | -1.1, 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Waista (cm) | 103 | 0.12 | 106 | 0.13 | 105 | 0.12 | +0.99 | 1.01 | 0.96, 1.02 | 0.4 |
| Fat mass (kg) | 42.3 | 8.4 | 42.9 | 8.9 | 44.54 | 9.2 | +0.22 | 0.34 | -0.50, 0.94 | 0.9 |
| Lean mass (kg) | 43.8 | 5.2 | 44.6 | 5.7 | 43.13 | 5.6 | -0.02 | 0.03 | -0.61, 0.57 | 0.5 |
| Body fat (%) | 47.8 | 3.5 | 47.6 | 3.6 | 47.72 | 3.8 | +0.07 | 0.32 | 0.60, 0.74 | 0.8 |
Abbreviation: GI, glycaemic index.
a Loge transformed for statistical analysis; geometric mean and s.d. of logged data, ratio of geometric means and confidence interval around ratio of geometric means presented.