Original Article
International Journal of Obesity (2008) 32, 166–176; doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803706; published online 14 August 2007
A randomized clinical trial of a standard versus vegetarian diet for weight loss: the impact of treatment preference
L E Burke1, M Warziski2, M A Styn2, E Music2, A G Hudson3 and S M Sereika4
- 1Department of Health and Community Systems and the Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- 2Department of Health and Community Systems, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- 3Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- 4Department of Health and Community Systems and the Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Correspondence: Dr LE Burke, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing and the Graduate School of Public Health, 3500 Victoria St, 415 Victoria Building, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. E-mail: lbu100@pitt.edu
Received 14 February 2007; Revised 7 May 2007; Accepted 24 June 2007; Published online 14 August 2007.
Abstract
Background:
With obesity rampant, methods to achieve sustained weight loss remain elusive.
Objective:
To compare the long-term weight-loss efficacy of 2 cal and fat-restricted diets, standard (omnivorous) versus lacto–ovo–vegetarian, and to determine the effect of a chosen diet versus an assigned diet.
Design, subjects:
A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 176 adults who were sedentary and overweight (mean body mass index, 34.0 kg/m2). Participants were first randomly assigned to either receive their preferred diet or be assigned to a diet group and second, were given their diet of preference or randomly assigned to a standard weight-loss diet or a lacto–ovo–vegetarian diet. Participants underwent a university-based weight-control program consisting of daily dietary and exercise goals plus 12 months of behavioral counseling followed by a 6-month maintenance phase.
Measurements:
Percentage change in body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, low- and high-density lipoprotein, glucose, insulin and macronutrient intake.
Results:
The program was completed by 132 (75%) of the participants. At 18 months, mean percentage weight loss was greater (P=0.01) in the two groups that were assigned a diet (standard, 8.0% (s.d., 7.8%); vegetarian, 7.9% (s.d., 8.1%)) than in those provided the diet of their choice (standard, 3.9% (s.d., 6.1%); vegetarian, 5.3% (s.d., 6.2%)). No difference was observed in weight loss between the two types of diet. Over the 18-month program, all groups showed significant weight loss.
Conclusions:
Participants assigned to their dietary preference did not have enhanced treatment outcomes. However, all groups lost weight with losses ranging from 4 to 8% at 18 months.
Keywords:
treatment preference, lacto–ovo–vegetarian, behavioral weight-loss treatment, randomized clinical trial
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Nature Clinical Practice Endocrinology & Metabolism Review (01 Mar 2008)
Nature Clinical Practice Endocrinology & Metabolism Review (01 Mar 2008)
RESEARCH
Obesity Original Article
Energy Restriction with Different Protein Quantities and Source: Implications for Innate Immunity
Obesity Original Article
Total cardiovascular risk profile of Taiwanese vegetarians
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition Original Article

