Original Article

International Journal of Obesity (2007) 31, 1277–1285; doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803579; published online 6 March 2007

Habitual physical activity differentially affects acute and short-term energy intake regulation in young and older adults

E L Van Walleghen1, J S Orr1, C L Gentile1, K P Davy1 and B M Davy1

1Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

Correspondence: Assistant Professor BM Davy, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, 221 Wallace Hall (0430), Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. E-mail: bdavy@vt.edu

Received 3 August 2006; Revised 21 January 2007; Accepted 22 January 2007; Published online 6 March 2007.

Top

Abstract

Background:

 

Energy intake (EI) regulation is impaired in older adults, but it is not known if habitual physical activity affects accuracy of EI regulation in older compared with young adults.

Objective:

 

We hypothesized that the ability to compensate for a high-energy yogurt preload beverage at a subsequent ad libitum meal (i.e. acute compensation) and over the course of the testing day (i.e. short-term compensation) would decrease with age, but the magnitude of the decline would be smaller in physically active compared with sedentary older adults.

Design:

 

On two occasions, young active (n=15), young sedentary (n=14), older active (n=14) and older sedentary (n=11) subjects consumed either a high-energy yogurt preload beverage (YP: 500 ml, 1988 kJ, men; 375 ml, 1507 kJ, women), or no preload (NP), 30 min before an ad libitum test meal. EI at both ad libitum meals was measured, and total daily EI was determined on both testing days. Percent EI compensation for the YP was calculated for the test meal and testing day to determine acute and short-term compensation.

Results:

 

Percent EI compensation at the test meal was significantly lower in the older compared with the young subjects (65plusminus4 vs 81plusminus4%, P=0.005). There was no effect of habitual physical activity level on acute compensation, and no age by physical activity level interaction (P=0.60). In contrast, short-term compensation was not different with age (87plusminus5 vs 93plusminus6%, older vs young, P=0.45), but was more accurate in active vs sedentary subjects (100plusminus5 vs 79plusminus6%, P=0.01). As with acute compensation, there was no age by physical activity interaction (P=0.39).

Conclusion:

 

Acute EI regulation is impaired in older adults, which is not attenuated by physical activity status. However, EI regulation over the course of a day is more accurate in active vs sedentary adults, which may facilitate long-term energy balance. Future work is needed to determine if higher energy expenditure in older active vs older sedentary adults improves long-term EI regulation.

Keywords:

aging, physical activity, compensation, ad libitum meal, energy intake

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT