Original Article
International Journal of Obesity (2007) 31, 147–152. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803359; published online 25 April 2006
Regional differences in abdominal fat loss
J A Kanaley1, I Giannopoulou1 and L L Ploutz-Snyder1
1Department of Exercise Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA
Correspondence: Dr J Kanaley, Exercise Science, 820 Comstock Ave, Rm. 201, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA. E-mail: jakanale@syr.edu
Received 29 November 2005; Revised 16 February 2006; Accepted 5 March 2006; Published online 25 April 2006.
Abstract
Objective:
This study determined if the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol used alters the estimation of change in abdominal fat with weight loss in obese type 2 diabetic women. This study also examined if there is a uniform fat loss across the abdomen.
Methods and procedures:
Thirty-three obese postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes (age 50–70 years, body mass index>30 kg/m2) had a total abdominal MRI scan pre- and post weight loss intervention. Three different MRI analysis protocols were used and compared: a single slice at L2–L3 vs five slices (centered at L4–L5) vs all abdominal slices. In addition, the total abdominal scan was divided into four regions (four slices each) with region 3 (critical region) including the traditionally studied L2–L3, and regions 1 and 2 superior and region 4 inferior to critical region 3. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures was used to compare the influence of weight loss on abdominal fat measured both regionally and using the varying number of MR slices.
Results:
At baseline, the ratio of visceral adipose tissue:subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT:SAT) was significantly lower using the single-slice method compared to five slices and the total abdomen (P<0.01). Using the single-slice method, a lower %VAT was found than with the other methods (P<0.01). In regions 1, 2, 3, and 4, the absolute change in total fat was 122
50, 182
48, 182
55, and 155
40 cm3, respectively. The regional difference in abdominal fat patterning revealed that the critical region (region 3) had a smaller VAT:SAT ratio than regions 1 and 2 (P<0.05), and the ratio at region 4 was smaller than region 3 (P<0.05). Weight loss resulted in a decrease in the VAT:SAT ratio (P<0.05) for regions 3 and 4 but not for regions 1 and 2.
Conclusions:
The number of MR slices analyzed yields differential result in relative VAT distribution. Regional differences in abdominal fat loss occur with a greater relative VAT loss in the critical region, thus if only the critical region is analyzed the overall VAT loss induced by weight loss intervention may be overestimated.
Keywords:
intra-abdominal fat, single slice, multiple-slice scanning, MRI
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
RESEARCH
Kidney International Trade News
Regional differences in abdominal fat loss
International Journal of Obesity Original Article
International Journal of Obesity Original Article
International Journal of Obesity Original Article

