Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Waist-to-hip ratio is a better screening measure for cardiovascular risk factors than other anthropometric indicators in Tehranian adult men

International Journal of Obesity volume 28, pages 1325–1332 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is essential to identify the best anthropometric index in any population to predict chronic disease risk.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHpR) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) to predict cardiovascular risk factors in an urban adult population of Tehranian men.

DESIGN: Population-based cross-sectional study.

SUBJECTS: A representative sample of 4449 men aged 18–74 y, participants of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study

METHODS: Demographic data were collected; anthropometric indices and blood pressure were measured according to standard protocol. In the 18–34 y age category, cutoff points for BMI, WHpR, WHtR and WC were 24 kg/m2, 0.86, 0.47 and 81 cm, respectively. In the 35–54 y age category these cut points were 26 kg/m2, 0.91, 0.52 and 89 cm, and in the 55–74 y age category 26 kg/m2, 0.95, 0.54 and 91 cm, respectively. Hypertension was defined based on JNC VI. Biochemical analysis was conducted on fasting blood samples. Diabetes was defined as fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dl or 2hPG ≥200 mg/dl and dyslipidemia based on ATP III. The presence of ‘at least one risk factor’ from the three major cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes) was also evaluated.

RESULTS: Mean age of men was 41.8±15.4 y. Mean BMI, WHpR, WC and WHtR for subjects were 25.6±4.2 kg/m2, 0.91±0.07, 87.7±11.7 cm and 0.51±0.02, respectively. Dyslipidemia and ‘at least one risk factor’ are more prevalent risk categories. Although all anthropometric indicators had a significant association to cardiovascular risk factors, WHpR had the highest correlation coefficients compared to other anthropometric measures. For all risk factors in all age categories, the highest odds ratios were pertained to WHpR. Of the four individual indicators, WHpR had the highest sensitivity, specificity and accuracy to predict cardiovascular risk factors. Cutoff points for WHpR were seen to have a higher percentage of correct prediction than BMI, WC and WHtR in all age categories.

CONCLUSION: It is concluded that WHpR is a better predictor for cardiovascular risk factors than BMI, WC and WHtR in Tehranian adult men.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mokdad AH, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Bowman BA, Marks JS, Koplan JP . The continuing epidemic of obesity in the United States. JAMA 2000; 284: 1650–1651.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM, Campbell SM, Johnson CL . Increasing prevalence of overweight among U.S. adults. JAMA 1994; 272: 205–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. deOnis M, Blossner M . Prevalence and trends of overweight among preschool children in developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 72: 1032–1039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Obesity epidemic puts millions at risk from related diseases, Press Release WHO/46 (online), 1997 June 12; www.who.int/inf-prp1997/en/pr97-46.html.

  5. Azizi F, Esmaillzadeh A, Mirmiran P . Obesity in relation to cardiovascular disease risk factors: an epidemiologic study in Tehran. Int J Endocrinol Metab 2004; 20: 379–387.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pishdad GR . Overweight and obesity in adults aged 20–74 in southern Iran. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1996; 20: 963–965.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarraf-Zadegan N, Sayed-Tabatabaei FA, Bashardoost N, Maleki A, Totonchi M, Habibi HR, Sotodehmaram E, Tafazoli F, Karimi A . The prevalence of coronary artery disease in an urban population in Isfahan, Iran. Acta Cardiol 1999; 54: 257–263.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic, Report of a WHO consultation on obesity, 3–5 June 1997, WHO/NUT/NCD/98.1. WHO: Geneva.

  9. Stevens J, Cai J, Pamuk ER, Williamson DF, Thun MJ, Wood JL . The effect of age on the association between body mass index and mortality. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei M, Gaskill SP, Haffner SM, Stern MP . Waist circumference as the best predictor of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus compared to BMI, WHR over other anthropometric measurements in Mexican Americans: a 7-year prospective study. Obes Res 1997; 5: 16–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Folsom AR, Kaye SA, Sellers TA, Hong CP, Cerhan JR, Potter JD, Prineas RJ . Body fat distribution and 5-year risk of death in older women. JAMA 1993; 269: 483–487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pi-Sunyer FX . Obesity: criteria and classification. Proc Nutr Soc 2000; 59: 505–509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Seidell J, Han T, Feskens E, Lean M . Narrow hips and broad waist circumference independently contribute to increased risk of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Intern Med 1997; 242: 401–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Beegom R, Beegom R, Niaz MA, Singh RB . Diet, central obesity and prevalence of hypertension in urban population of south India. Int J Cardiol 1995; 51: 183–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dipietro L, Katz LD, Nadel ER . Excess abdominal adiposity remains correlated with altered lipid concentrations in healthy older women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999; 23: 432–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pouliot MC, Despres JP, Lemieux S, Moorjani S, Bouchard C, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, Lupien PJ . Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 460–468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ledoux M, Lambert J, Reeder BA, Despres JP . A comparative analysis of weight to height and waist to hip circumference indices as indicators of the presence of cardiovascular disease risk factors—Canadian Heart Health Surveys Research Group. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 157 (Suppl 1): S32–S38.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dobbelsteyn CJ, Joffres MR, Mac Lean DR, Flowerdew G, the Canadian Heart Surveys Research Group. A comparative evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as indicators of cardiovascular risk factors: The Canadian Heart Health Surveys. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 652–661.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Seidell JC, Cigolini M, Charzewska J, Ellsingen BM, di-Biase G . Fat distribution in European women: a comparison of anthropometric measurements in relation to cardiovascular risk factors. Int J Epidemiol 1990; 19: 303–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin WY, Lee LT, Chen CY, Lo H, Hsia HH, Liu IL, Lin RS, Shau WY, Huang KC . Optimal cut-off values for obesity: using simple anthropometric indices to predict cardiovascular risk factors in Taiwan. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 1232–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Welborn TA, Dhaliwal SS, Bennett SA . Waist–hip ratio is the dominant risk factor predicting cardiovascular death in Australia. Med J Aust 2003; 179: 580–585.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Molarius A, Seidell JC . Selection of anthropometric indicators for classification of abdominal fatness—a critical review. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998; 22: 719–727.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepulueda D, Pierson RN, Harris T, Heymsfield SB . How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex and ethnic groups. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143: 228–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lear SA, Chen MM, Frohlich JJ, Birmingham CL . The relationship between waist circumference and metabolic risk factors: cohorts of European and Chinese descent. Metabolism 2002; 51: 1427–1432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Azizi F, Rahmani M, Emami H, Majid M . Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study: rationale and design. CVD Prev 2000; 3: 242–247.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mirmiran P, Mohammadi F, Allahverdian S, Azizi F . Estimation of energy requirements for adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 2003; 73: 193–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Friedwald WT, Levy RJ, Fredrickson DS . Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972; 18: 499–502.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mirmiran P, Esmaillzadeh A, Azizi F . Detection of cardiovascular risk factors by anthropometric measures in Tehranian adults: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 2004. (in press).

  29. WHO Expert Committee on Physical Status. The use and interpretation of anthropometry, Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organization: Geneva; 1995.

  30. National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. Circulation 2002; 106: 3143–3421.

  31. Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 2413–2446.

  32. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diab Care 1997; 20: 1183.

  33. Seidell JC, Bjorntorp P, Sjostrom L, Sannerstedt R, Krotkiewski M, Kvist H . Regional distribution of muscle and fat mass in men—new insight into the risk of abdominal obesity using computed tomography. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1989; 13: 289–303.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ferland M, Despres JP, Tremblay A, Pinault S, Nadeau A, Moorjani S, Lupien PJ, Theriault G, Bouchard C . Assessment of adipose tissue distribution by computed axial tomography in obese women: association with body density and anthropometric measurements. Br J Nutr 1989; 6: 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schlemmer A, Hassager C, Haarbo J, Christiansen C . Direct measurement of abdominal fat by dual photon absorptiometry. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1990; 14: 603–611.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lakka HM, Lakka TA, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT . Abdominal obesity is associated with increased risk of acute coronary events in men. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 706–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hartz A, Grubb B, Wild R, Van Nort JJ, Kuhn E, Freedman D, Rimm A . The association of waist hip ratio and angiographically determined coronary artery disease. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1990; 14: 657–665.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kissebah AH, Krakower GR . Regional adiposity and morbidity. Physiol Rev 1994; 74: 761–811.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kortelainen ML, Sarkioja T . Coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial hypertrophy in relation to body fat distribution in healthy women: an autopsy study on 33 violent deaths. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1994; 21: 43–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kotchen JM, Cox-Ganser J, Wright CJ, Kotchen TA . Gender differences in obesity-related cardiovascular disease risk factors among participants in a weight loss program. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1993; 17: 145–151.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ito H, Nakasuga K, Ohshima A, Maruyama T, Kaji Y, Harada M, Fukunaga M, Jingu S, Sakamoto M . Detection of cardiovascular risk factors by indices of obesity obtained from anthropometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Japanese individuals. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003; 27: 232–237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Husseini A, Abdul-Rahim H, Giacaman R, Jervell J, Bjertness E . Selected factors associated with diabetes mellitus in a rural Palestinian community. Med Sci Monit 2003; 9: CR181–CR185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nishter S, Wierzbicki AS, Lumb PJ, Lambert-Hammil M, Turner CN, Crook MA, Mattu MA, Shahab S, Badar A, Ehsan A, Marber MS, Gill J . Waist-to-hip ratio and low HDL predict the risk of coronary artery disease in Pakistanis. Curr Med Res Opin 2004; 20: 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Bose K, Mascie-Taylor CG . Conicity index and waist–hip ratio and their relationship with total cholesterol and blood pressure in middle-aged European and migrant Pakistani men. Ann Hum Biol 1998; 25: 11–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Onat A, sansoy V, Uysal O . Waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio in Turkish adults: interrelation with other risk factors and association with cardiovascular disease. Int J Cardiol 1999; 70: 43–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu S, Wang Z, Heshka S, Heo M, Faith MS, Heymsfield SB . Waist circumference and obesity-associated risk factors among whites in the NHANES III: clinical action thresholds. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76: 743–749.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Taylor RW, Keil D, Gold EJ, Williams SM, Goulding A . Body mass index, waist girth and waist-to-hip ratio as indexes of total and regional adiposity in women: evaluation using receiver operating characteristic curves. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 67: 44–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Foucan L, Hanley J, Deloumeaux J, Suissa S . Body mass index and waist circumference as screening tools for cardiovascular risk factors in Guadeloupean women. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 990–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Woo J, Ho SC, Yu AL, Sham A . Is waist circumference a useful measure in predicting health outcomes in the elderly? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 1349–1355.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Moreno LA, Pineda I, Rodriguez G, Fleta J, Sarria A, Bueno M . Waist circumference for the screening of the metabolic syndrome in children. Acta Paediatr 2002; 91: 1307–1312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Shetterly SM, Marshall JA, Baxter J, Hamman RF . Waist–hip ratio measurement location influences associations with measures of glucose and lipid metabolism. The San Luis Valley Diabetes Study. Ann Epidemiol 1993; 3: 295–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Daniel M, Marion SA, Sheps SB, Hertzman C, Gamble D . Variation by body mass index and age in waist-to-hip ratio associations with glycemic status in an aboriginal population at risk for type 2 diabetes in British Columbia. Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 69: 455–460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Han TS, Bijan FC, Lean MEJ, Seidell JC . Separate associations of waist and hip circumference with lifestyle factors. Int J Epidemiol 1998; 27: 422–430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Azizi F, Esmaillzadeh A, Mirmiran P, Ainy E . Is there an independent association between waist-to-hip ratio and cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese women? Int J Cardiol 2004. (in press).

  55. Azizi F, Esmaillzadeh A, Mirmiran P, Shiva N . Which anthropometric indicator is a better screening measure for cardiovascular risk factors in Tehranian women? Payesh 2004. (in press).

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Guarantor: F Azizi.

  2. Contribution of authors: AE and PM designed the study, collected and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. FA supervised the research.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Endocrine Research Center, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    A Esmaillzadeh, P Mirmiran & F Azizi

Authors
  1. A Esmaillzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P Mirmiran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F Azizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F Azizi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esmaillzadeh, A., Mirmiran, P. & Azizi, F. Waist-to-hip ratio is a better screening measure for cardiovascular risk factors than other anthropometric indicators in Tehranian adult men. Int J Obes 28, 1325–1332 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802757

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802757

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links