Paper
International Journal of Obesity (2004) 28, 1299–1308. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802752 Published online 17 August 2004
Recognition and management of overweight and obesity in primary care in Germany
P Bramlage1,3, H-U Wittchen2,8, D Pittrow3, W Kirch3, P Krause2, H Lehnert4, T Unger5, M Höfler2,8, B Küpper2, S Dahm6, S Böhler1 and A M Sharma7
- 1Consulant, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technical University, Dresden, Germany
- 2Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technical University, Dresden, Germany
- 3Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, Technical University, Dresden, Germany
- 4Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- 5Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- 6Franz Volhard Clinic – Charité, Berlin, Germany
- 7Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- 8Max-Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
Correspondence: Dr P Bramlage, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technical University, Chemnitzer Strasse 46, 01187 Dresden, Germany. E-mail: peter.bramlage@mailbox.tu-dresden.de
Received 29 December 2003; Revised 12 May 2004; Accepted 15 June 2004; Published online 17 August 2004.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In contrast to the well-documented high prevalence of overweight and obesity in the general population, the prevalence, recognition rates and management by primary care physicians—as the core gatekeeper in the health care system—remains poorly studied.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: To examine (1) the point prevalence of overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI
30 kg/m2) in primary care patients, (2) prevalence patterns in patients with high-risk constellations (diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, etc.), (3) doctors' recognition and interventions, as well as patients' use and perceived effectiveness of weight-loss interventions and (4) factors associated with non-treatment.
METHODS: Cross-sectional point prevalence study of 45 125 unselected consecutive primary care attendees recruited from a representative nationwide sample of 1912 primary care practices. Measures: (1) standardized clinical appraisal of each patient by the physician (diagnostic status and recognition, severity, comorbidity, current and past interventions). (2) Patient self-report questionnaire: height and weight, illness history, past and current treatments and their perceived effectiveness, health attitudes and behaviors.
RESULTS: (1) In all, 37.9% of all primary care attendees were overweight, 19.4% obese. (2) Rates for overweight and obesity were highest in patients with diabetes (43.6 and 36.7%) and hypertension (46.1 and 31.3%), followed by patients with cardiovascular disorders. Rates of overweight/obesity increased steadily by the number of comorbid conditions. (3) Doctors' recognition of overweight (20–30%) and obesity (50–65%) was low, patients' actual use of weight control interventions even lower (past 12 months: 8–11%, lifetime: 32–39%). Patient success rates were quite limited. (4) Co- and multimorbidity in particular as well as other patient and illness variables were identified as predictors for recognition, but prediction of patients' actual use of weight loss interventions was limited.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care management of overweight and obesity is largely deficient, predominantly due to four interrelated factors: doctors' poor recognition of patients' weight status, doctors' inefficient efforts at intervention, patients' poor acceptance of such interventions and dissatisfaction with existing life-style modification strategies.
Keywords:
prevalence, recognition, multimorbidity, awareness, hypertension, diabetes
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
NEWS AND VIEWS
Urinary incontinence Can weight loss treat urinary incontinence in obese women?
Nature Reviews Urology News and Views (01 May 2009)

