Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Does obesity influence foot structure and plantar pressure patterns in prepubescent children?

International Journal of Obesity volume 25, pages 845–852 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of obesity on plantar pressure distributions in prepubescent children.

DESIGN: Field-based, experimental data on BMI (body mass index), foot structure and plantar pressures were collected for 13 consenting obese children and 13 non-obese controls.

SUBJECTS: Thirteen obese (age 8.1±1.2 y; BMI 25.5±2.9 kg/m2) and 13 non-obese (age 8.4±0.9 y; BMI 16.9±1.2 kg/m2) prepubescent children, matched to the obese children for gender, age and height.

MEASUREMENTS: Height and weight were measured to calculate BMI. Static weight-bearing footprints for the right and left foot of each subject were recorded using a pedograph to calculate the footprint angle and the Chippaux–Smirak index as representative measures of the surface area of the foot in contact with the ground. Right and left foot plantar pressures were then obtained using a mini-emed® pressure platform to calculate the force and pressure experienced under each child's foot during static and dynamic loaded and unloaded conditions.

RESULTS: Obese subjects displayed significantly lower footprint angle (t=4.107; P=<0.001) values and higher Chippaux–Smirak index values (t=−6.176; P=<0.001) compared to their non-obese counterparts. These structural foot changes were associated with differences in plantar pressures between the two subject groups. That is, although rearfoot dynamic forces generated by the obese subjects were significantly higher than those generated by the non-obese subjects, these forces were experienced over significantly higher mean peak areas of contact with the mini-emed® system. Therefore, rearfoot pressures experienced by the two subject groups did not differ. However, the mean peak dynamic forefoot pressures generated by the obese subjects (39.3±15.7 N·cm−2; q=3.969) were significantly higher than those generated by the non-obese subjects (32.3±9.2 N·cm−2).

CONCLUSIONS: It is postulated that foot discomfort-associated structural changes and increased forefoot plantar pressures in the obese foot may hinder obese children from participating in physical activity and therefore warrants immediate further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

1
2
3
4
5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jahss MH . Disorders of the foot WB Saunders Company: Philadelphia 1982.

  2. Ker RF, Bennett MB, Bibby SR, Kester RC, Alexander RMcN . The spring in the arch of the human foot Nature 1987 325: 147–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Platzer W . Locomotor system Georg Thieme: Stuttgart 1992.

  4. Cavanagh PR, Kram R . Stride length in distance running: velocity, body dimensions, and added mass effects Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989 21: 467–479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kram R, McMahon TA, Taylor CR . Load carriage with compliant poles—physiological and/or biomechanical advantages? J Biomech 1987 20: 893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin PE . Mechanical and physiological responses to lower extremity loading during running Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985 17: 427–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nyska M, Linge K, McCabe C, Kienerman L . The adaptation of the foot to heavy loads plantar foot pressures study In: Cavanagh P (ed). Proceedings of the V Emed Scientific Meeting Pennstate: Pennsylvania 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gehlsen GM, Seger A . Selected measures of angular displacement, strength, and flexibility in subjects with and without shin splints Res Q Exerc Sport 1980 51: 478–485.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Messier SP, Davies AB, Moore DT, Davis SE, Pack RJ, Kazmar SC . Severe obesity: effects on foot mechanics during walking Foot Ankle Int 1994 15: 29–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Viitasalo JT, Kvist M . Some biomechanical aspects of the foot and ankle in athletes with and without shin splints Am J Sports Med 1983 11: 125–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Riddiford‐Harland DL, Steele JR, Storlien LH . Does obesity influence foot structure in prepubescent children? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000 24: 541–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hammer LD, Kraemer HC, Wilson DM, Ritter PL, Dornbusch SM . Standardised percentile curves of body-mass index for children and adolescents Am J Dis Children 1991 145: 259–263.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Forriol F, Pascual J . Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years of age Foot Ankle Int 1990 11: 101–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. National Health & Medical Research Council . Statement on human experimentation NHMRC: Australia 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wu KK . Foot orthoses. Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore, MD 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hennig EM . Measurement and evaluation of loads on the human body during sports activities In: Riehle HJ, Vieten MM (eds). Proceedings I of the XVI International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports UVK-Univesitätsverlag: Konstanz 1998 399–402.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meyer-Rice B, Sugars L, McPoil T, Cornwall MW . Comparison of three methods for obtaining plantar pressures in nonpathologic subjects JAPMA 1994 84: 449–504.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hennig EM, Staats A, Rosenbaum D . Plantar pressure distribution patterns of young school children in comparison to adults Foot Ankle Int 1994 15: 35–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Smahel Z . Effects of body weight on the configuration of the plantar arch (planimetric study) Hum Biol 1980 52: 449–57.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Norkin CC, Levangie PK . Joint structure and function F.A. Davis: Philadelphia, PA 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Science, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

    AM Dowling & JR Steele

  2. Sydney University Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, The New Children's Hospital, New South Wales, Australia

    LA Baur

Authors
  1. AM Dowling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. JR Steele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. LA Baur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to JR Steele.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dowling, A., Steele, J. & Baur, L. Does obesity influence foot structure and plantar pressure patterns in prepubescent children?. Int J Obes 25, 845–852 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801598

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801598

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links