Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
International Journal of Obesity
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 
June 2001, Volume 25, Number 6, Pages 793-797
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF
Paper
A disparity between conventional lipid and insulin resistance markers at body mass index levels greater than 34 kg/m2
J B Dixon and P O'Brien

Monash University Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence to: J B Dixon, Monash University Department of Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne 3181, Australia. E-mail: john.dixon@med.monash.edu.au

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine changes in lipid profile and markers of insulin resistance with increasing body mass index (BMI) in the range 34-77 kg/m2. In addition we compare the lipid profiles of severely obese patients with those of the Australian community.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 572 patients (85% F, 15% M) were assessed prior to gastric restrictive surgery. Conventional lipid profiles and markers of insulin resistance were measured. Lipids were compared with the Australian National Heart Foundation 1989 study (control group).

RESULT: There was no difference in mean total cholesterol levels between the obese group (5.52 mmol/l) and the control group (5.47 mmol/l). The mean total cholesterol levels in the obese group fell with increasing BMI (r=-0.13, P<0.01). Obese subjects had elevated fasting triglyceride levels 1.96 mmol/l (control group, 1.12 mmol/l, P<0.001), but levels did not change with increasing BMI (r=0.0, NS). HDL-C levels were lower, 1.21 mmol/l (control group 1.44 mmol/l, P<0.001), and decreased with increasing BMI (r=-0.20, P<0.01). LDL-C levels were lower in obese men (3.65 mmol/l vs control group 4.17 mmol/l, P<0.01) but not women and levels fell with increasing BMI (r=-0.15, P<0.05). For the obese group, markers of insulin resistance (fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, fasting plasma insulin and C-peptide) all rose significantly with increasing BMI.

CONCLUSION: Raised total cholesterol is not a co-morbidity of severe obesity. There is a disparity between the conventional lipid measures and insulin resistance measures of the metabolic syndrome with increasing BMI. Conventional lipid measures may be poor indicators of dyslipidaemic risk in the severely obese.

International Journal of obesity (2001) 25, 793-797

Keywords

morbid obesity; dyslipidemia; insulin resistance; body mass index; risk

Received 10 March 2000; revised 26 September 2000; accepted 16 January 2001
June 2001, Volume 25, Number 6, Pages 793-797
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF
Privacy Policy © 2001 Nature Publishing Group