|
|
|
| April 2001, Volume 25, Number 4, Pages 478-485 |
| Table of contents Previous Article Next [PDF] |
 |
| Paper |
| Sibutramine metabolites increase glucose transport by cultured rat muscle cells |
 |
| C J Bailey, S L Turner, S H Bates and R B Jones |
 |
School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
|
 |
Correspondence to: C J Bailey, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK
|
 |
| Abstract |
 | BACKGROUND: The anti-obesity agent sibutramine, a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), has been shown to reduce insulin resistance and improve glycaemic control in obese-diabetic ob/ob mice and overweight type 2 diabetic patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether sibutramine or its metabolites act directly on muscle cells to improve glucose uptake and insulin action. DESIGN: Uptake of the non-metabolized glucose analogue 2-deoxyglucose was measured in cultured L6 rat muscle cells after incubation with sibutramine, its two pharmacologically active metabolites and related agents. RESULTS: Sibutramine itself (10-8-10-6M) did not significantly affect 2-deoxyglucose uptake during incubations up to 72 h. The primary amine metabolite M2 (10-7 and 10-6M) increased basal and insulin-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake (by 12% and 34%) after 24 h incubation. These effects of M2 were lost by 72 h incubation. However, the secondary amine metabolite M1 (10-6 M) increased basal and insulin-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake (by 50%) after 72 h incubation, although M1 was ineffective after 24 h. M2 stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake in the presence of LY-294,002 (an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase) but the effect of M2 was inhibited by cytochalasin B, which acutely blocks glucose transporters. Incubations with serotoninergic, noradrenergic and dopaminergic agents, or agents known to stimulate release or inhibit reuptake of these substances in nervous tissues indicated that the sibutramine metabolites were not affecting 2-deoxyglucose uptake via mechanisms associated with their SNRI properties. CONCLUSIONS: Sibutramine metabolites can improve insulin-sensitive 2-deoxyglucose uptake by cultured muscle cells independently of SNRI effects. International Journal of Obesity (2001) 25, 478-485 |
 |
| Keywords |
 | sibutramine; glucose transport; cultured L6 muscle cells; insulin action |
 |  |
Introduction
The anti-obesity agent sibutramine is a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) which induces satiety, stimulates thermogenesis and reduces weight gain in rodents.1,2,3,4,5,6 In clinical studies sibutramine promoted weight loss in obesity,6,7,8 and preliminary evidence indicates that sibutramine improves glycaemic control in overweight type 2 diabetic patients.9,10
Sibutramine reduced insulin resistance and weight gain in obese-diabetic ob/ob mice.5 An improved insulin action could be due to the weight loss itself or to the potential for sibutramine or its active metabolites (M1 and M2) to improve insulin action, at least in part, independently of the weight-reducing effect. To investigate this possibility, sibutramine, its metabolites and various structurally and pharmacologically related agents were exposed to cultured L6 muscle cells. Glucose uptake by the cells was assessed in the absence and presence of added insulin using the non-metabolized analogue 2-deoxyglucose.
|
 Materials and methods
Materials
Cell culture reagents were from Gibco (Paisley, Scotland), plastic were was from Sarstedt (Leicester) and Hi-safe II scintillant was from Fisons (Loughborough). 2-Deoxy-D-[3H]-glucose (15.0 Ci/mmol) was from Amersham International (Amersham); sibutramine hydrochloride, its metabolites and nordexfenfluramine were from Knoll Pharmaceuticals (Nottingham), and nisoxetine hydrochloride was from Research Biochemicals International (St Albans). Other chemicals were of analytical grade from Sigma (Poole) and BDH (Poole).
Cell culture
Monolayers of rat L6 muscle cells (European Culture Collection, Porton Down) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 1 mM glutamate, 1 mM pyruvate and 25 mM glucose.11 The medium was supplemented with 5% foetal calf serum (FCS), 100 U/ml penicillin G, 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 25 µg/ml amphotericin B. Cells were maintained at 37°C with humidified 95% air and 5% CO2. Experiments were undertaken in 24-well plates seeded from preconfluent flasks with 5´105 cells in 1 ml. The cells (passages 8-18) were grown to confluence and the medium was changed to DMEM containing 0.5% FCS and 2.5 mM glucose for 24 h to induce differentiation and fusion of myoblasts into myotubes. Myotubes were then incubated with test compounds for 24-72 h.
Deoxyglucose uptake
Cell monolayers were washed with glucose-free Krebs Ringer bicarbonate (KRB) buffer at 22°C, then incubated in 1 ml of this buffer supplemented with 0.1 mM 2-deoxy-D-glucose and 2-deoxy-D-[3H]-glucose (0.2 µCi/ml) for 10 min at 22°C. Buffer was then aspirated and cells were washed twice with ice-cold KRB buffer, lysed with 0.5 ml 1 M NaOH, and radioactivity was counted in 5 ml Hi-safe II scintillant using a Packard 1900TR liquid scintillation counter. Experiments were undertaken in multiples of six wells on at least two occasions. Six control wells and six wells containing a test concentration of insulin were included in each 24-well plate. Uptake of 2-deoxyglucose was expressed as the percentage change compared with control (100%). Control (basal) uptake of 2-deoxyglucose was about 9 pmol/105 cells/min in the present studies. Data are presented as mean±sem and compared using Student's unpaired t-test with Bonferronni's correction. Probability values of P<0.05 were considered to be significant.
|
 Results
Sibutramine and its metabolites
L6 muscle cells were incubated with 10-8-10-6 M sibutramine or each of its metabolites (M1 and M2) for 24, 48 and 72 h prior to determination of 2-deoxyglucose uptake. In the absence of added insulin, incubation with sibutramine did not significantly alter 2-deoxyglucose uptake (Figure 1A). However M2 (10-7 and 10-6 M) produced a small concentration-related increase in 2-deoxyglucose uptake (by 23% and 34% respectively; P<0.05) after 24 h, but did not produce a significant effect after longer incubation times. In contrast M1 (10-6 M) significantly increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake (by 18%, P<0.05) only after 72 h incubation.
Addition of insulin (10-8 M for 24 h) to the control incubation medium increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake by about 40% (P<0.01; Figure 1B). Addition of insulin (10-8 M) for the last 24 h of incubations with sibutramine (24-72 h) had no further effect on 2-deoxyglucose uptake. However, in the presence of added insulin, M2 (10-7 and 10-6 M) produced a small further increase (by 12% and 16%, respectively; P<0.05) in 2-deoxyglucose uptake after 24 h, but not after longer incubation times. M1 (10-6 M) increased insulin-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake by a further 50% (P<0.05 compared with insulin only) after incubation for 72 h.
To investigate the mechanism of action of M2 on 2-deoxyglucose uptake, L6 cells were incubated for 24 h with his metabolite at 10-6 M. M2 increased insulin-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake at low insulin concentrations (10-9 and 10-8 M), but there was no additional effect of M2 on 2-deoxyglucose uptake at higher insulin concentrations (10-7 and 10-6 M); Figure 2). Inhibition of glucose transporters by incubation for 24 h with cytochalasin B (10-9-10-6 M) decreased basal and M2-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 3). Incubation for 24 h with LY-294,002 (10-9-10-5 M), an inhibitor of the insulin-signalling intermediate phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (P13-K), decreased basal uptake of 2-deoxyglucose in a concentration-related manner, but did not after M2-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake (Figure 4). Incubation for 24 h with an inhibitor of protein synthesis, cycloheximide, produced a concentration-related reduction of basal and M2-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake (Figure 5).
Other agents
Fluoxetine and nisoxetine (10-8-10-6 M), which selectively inhibit the reuptake of serotonin and noradrenaline respectively,12,13 did not significantly alter 2-deoxyglucose uptake after 24 h incubations with and without added insulin (10-8 M) (Figure 6). At 10-6 M, serotonin and dopamine reduced insulin-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake (by 17% and 23%, respectively, P<0.05), and dopamine (10-6 M) reduced 2-deoxyglucose uptake (by 17%, P<0.05) after 24 h incubation without added insulin (Figure 7). Lower concentrations of serotonin and dopamine, and the range of noradrenaline concentrations tested (10-8-10-6 M) did not significantly alter 2-deoxyglucose uptake.
The serotonin releaser fenfluramine and its active metabolite nordexfenfluramine (10-6-10-8 M) did not significantly after 2-deoxyglucose uptake after 24 h incubation without added insulin (Figure 8). However insulin-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake was increased by 10-8 and 10-7 M nordexfenfluramine (each by 17%, P<0.05). The noradrenaline releaser phentermine (10-6-10-8 M) did not affect 2-deoxyglucose uptake after 24 h incubations with and without added insulin.
|
 Discussion
The results show that sibutramine metabolites can increase 2-deoxyglucose uptake by cultured L6 muscle cells. Sibutramine is metabolized in vivo by the liver to the secondary amine metabolite M1, and then to the primary amine metabolite M2.14 M2 increased 2-deoxyglucose at 24 h whereas M1 was not effective at 24 h but became effective by 72 h. This raises the possibility that gradual conversion of M1 to M2 might at least partly account for the effectiveness of M1 after M2 in L6 muscle cells. It has recently been noted that M2 can stimulate 2-deoxyglucose uptake in isolated mouse soleus muscle (Liu and Stock, personal communication).
Although M2 increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake by muscle cells incubated without added insulin (basal uptake), this does not exclude a need for the presence of at least some insulin, since the cells were previously exposed to insulin in the FCS. However M2 produced a greater enhancement of 2-deoxyglucose uptake without added insulin and at low (submaximally stimulating) insulin concentrations. Since there was no increase produced by M2 at a maximally stimulating insulin concentration (Figure 2), this suggests that M2 does not increase maximal insulin responsiveness, as defined previously.15 This is consistent with an effect of M2 to increase glucose uptake mediated via the insulin-signalling cascade.
The insulin-signalling pathway(s) controlling glucose uptake involve PI3-K as an early component.16 This step is inhibited by LY-294,002,17 and a reduction in 2-deoxyglucose uptake was observed using this inhibitor (Figure 4). Since LY-294,002 did not inhibit M2-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake it is likely that M2 acts distally to Pl3-K. The fungal alkaloid, cytochalasin B acutely blocks sodium-independent glucose transporters.18 Reduced uptake of 2-deoxyglucose by M2 in the presence of cytochalasin indicates that M2 promotes glucose transport via a facilitated sodium-independent transporter such as GLUT1 and GLUT4 found in muscle cells.19 Reduced uptake of 2-deoxyglucose with cycloheximide shows that the transport process makes partial use of newly synthesized protein during the 24 h period of incubation.20,21 This occurred to a similar extent with M2, supporting the view that M2 increases 2-deoxyglucose uptake through the normal glucose transport processes, possibly involving increased translocation of sodium-independent glucose transporters into the plasma membrane.
Thus M2 might activate or enhance signalling pathways and biological effects that mediate insulin action, rather than cellular mechanisms that are entirely independent of insulin. Improved insulin sensitivity by M2 in muscle cells is consistent with the amelioration of insulin resistance during sibutramine treatment in ob/ob mice,5 and the improved glycaemic control during sibutramine treatment in obese type 2 diabetic patients.9,10 Although decreased adiposity itself would be expected to reduce insulin resistance,22,23 the present study suggest that M2 also acts directly on muscle to improve insulin action. Skeletal muscle is quantitatively the major site of insulin-stimulated glucose disposal, and an important focus of insulin resistance in obese type 2 diabetic patients.24,25
Sibutramine acts as an SNRI to induce satiety in rodents, indirectly enhancing activation of 5HT2A/2C receptors and 1 and 1 adrenoceptors.4,14,26,27,28 To investigate whether these mechanisms could account for increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake in muscle cells, experiments were under-taken with serotonin, noradrenaline, fluoxetine (serotonin reuptake inhibitor)13 and nisoxetine (noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor).12 None of these agents increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake, suggesting that M2 is not acting on the muscle cells via serotonin or noradrenaline mediated mechanisms. Although it is unlikely that sibutramine could indirectly enhance dopamine receptor function,14 there was no evidence that dopamine could stimulate 2-deoxyglucose uptake in muscle. Indeed, high concentrations (10-6 M) of serotonin and dopamine decreased 2-deoxyglucose uptake.
The serotonin-releasing anorectic agent fenfluramine has been reported to increase insulin action in vivo and in vitro, independently of its weight-reducing effect.29,30,31 Although fenfluramine itself did not significantly after 2-deoxyglucose uptake into the muscle cells, its active metabolite nordexfenfluramine increased insulin-stimulated 2-deoxyglucose uptake, presumably via a mechanism that is independent of serotonin.32 The lack of effect of the anorectic agent phentermine (a noradrenaline and dopamine releaser)33 on 2-deoxyglucose uptake by the muscle cells substantiates that an improvement of insulin sensitivity is not a general feature of amphetamine-based anorectic agents.34
Thus, sibutramine acts via its metabolites to increase insulin-sensitive glucose uptake by cultured L6 muscle cells. This is independent of the SNRI properties of sibutramine, and provides a means of reducing insulin resistance which is separate from that associated with decreased adiposity.
|
 |
| References |
 |
1 Buckett WR, Thomas PC, Luscombe GP. The pharmacology of sibutramine hydrochloride (BTS 54524), a new antidepressant which induces rapid noradrenergic down-regulation. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiat 1988; 12: 575-584,
2 Luscombe GP, Hopcroft RH, Thomas PC, Buckett WR. The contribution of metabolites to the rapid and potent down-regulation of rat cortical -adrenoceptors by the putative antidepressant sibutramine hydrochloride. Neuropharmacology 1989; 28: 129-134, MEDLINE
3 Connoley IP, Liu YL, Frost I, Reckless IP, Heal DJ, Stock MJ. Thermogenic effects of sibutramine and its metabolites. Br J Pharmac 1999; 126: 1487-1495,
4 Jackson HC, Bearham MC, Hutchins LJ, Mazurkiewicz SE, Needham AM, Heal DJ. Investigation of the mechanisms underlying the hypophagic effects of the 5-HT and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor, sibutramine, in the rat. Br J Pharmac 1997; 121: 1613-1618,
5 Day C, Bailey CJ. Effect of the antiobesity agent sibutramine in obese-diabetic ob/ob mice. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998; 22: 619-623,
6 McNeely W, Gor KL. Sibutramine: a review of its contribution to the management of obesity. Drugs 1998; 56: 1093-1124,
7 Weintraub M, Rubio A, Golik A, Byrne L, Scheinbaum ML. Sibutramine in weight control: a dose-ranging efficacy study. Clin Pharmac Ther 1991; 50: 330-337,
8 Apfelbaum M, Vague P, Ziegler O, Hanotin C, Thomas F, Leutenegger E. Long-term maintenance of weight loss after a very-low-calorie diet: a randomized blinded trial of the efficacy and tolerability of sibutramine. Am J Med 1999; 106: 179-184, Article MEDLINE
9 Vargas R, McMahan FG, Jain AK. Effects of sibutramine versus placebo in NIDDM. Clin Pharmac Ther 1994; 53: 188,
10 Griffiths J, Brynes AE, Frost G, Bloom SR, Finer N, Jones SP, Romanec FM. Sibutramine in the treatment of overweight non-insulin dependent diabetics. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1995; 19(Suppl 2): 41,
11 Yaffe D. Retention of differentiation potentialities during prolonged cultivation of myogenic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1968; 61: 477-483, MEDLINE
12 Wong DT, Threlkeld PG, Best KL, Bymaster FP. A new inhibitor of norpinepnrine uptake devoid of affinity for receptors in rat brain. J Pharm Exp Ther 1982; 222: 61-65,
13 Wong DT, Bymaster FP, Reid LR. Fluoxetine and two other serotonin uptake inhibitors without affinity for neuronal receptors. Biochem Pharmac 1983; 32: 1287-1293,
14 Heal DJ, Aspley S, Prow MR, Jackson HC, Martin KF, Cheetham SC. Sibutramine: a novel antiobesity drug. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998; 22(Suppl 1): S18-S28, MEDLINE
15 Kahn CR. Insulin resistance, insulin insensitivity and insulin unresponsiveness: a necessary distinction. Metabolism 1978; 27: 1893-1902, MEDLINE
16 Holman GD, Kasuga M. From receptor to transporter: insulin signalling to glucose transport. Diabetologia 1997; 40: 991-1003, Article MEDLINE
17 Vlahos CJ, Matter WJ, Hui KY, Brown RF. A specific inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, 2-(4-morpholinyl-8-phenyl)-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (LY294002). J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 5241-5248, MEDLINE
18 Klip A, Paquet M. Glucose transport and glucose transporters in muscle and their metabolic regulation. Diabetes Care 1990; 13: 228-243, MEDLINE
19 Koivisto UM, Martinez-Valdez H, Bilan PJ, Burkett E, Ramlal T, Klip A. Differential regulation of GLUT1 and GLUT4 glucose transport systems by glucose and insulin in L6 muscle cells in culture. J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 2615-2621, MEDLINE
20 Walker PS, Ramlal T, Sarabia V, Koivisto UM, Bilan PJ, Pessin JE, Klip A. Glucose transport activity in L6 muscle cells is regulated by the coordinate control of subcellular glucose transporter distribution, biosynthesis, and mRNA transcription. J Biol Chem 1990; 265: 1516-1523, MEDLINE
21 Klip A, Guma A, Ramlel T, Bilan PJ, Lam L, Leiter LA. Stimulation of hexose transport by metformin in L6 muscle cells in culture. Endocrinology 1992; 130: 2535-2544, MEDLINE
22 Henry RR, Wallace P, Olefsky JM. Effects of weight loss on mechanisms of hyperglycaemia in obese non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1986; 35: 990-998, MEDLINE
23 Wing RR, Shoemaker M, Marcus MDM, McDermott M, Gooding W. Variables associated with weight loss and improvements in glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Arch Intern Med 1990; 147: 1749-1753,
24 Baron AD, Brechtel G, Wallace P, Edelman SV. Rates and tissue sites of non-insulin and insulin-mediated uptake in humans. Am J Physiol 1988; 255: E769-E774, MEDLINE
25 DeFronzo RA. Pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes: metabolic and molecular implications for identifying diabetes genes. Diabetes Rev 1997; 5: 177-269,
26 Jackson HC, Needham AM, Hutchins LJ, Mazurkiewicz SE, Heal DJ. Comparison of the effect of sibutramine and other monoamine reuptake inhibitors on food intake in the rat. Brit J Pharmac 1997; 121: 1758-1762,
27 Heal DJ, Cheetham SC, Prow MR, Martin KF, Buckett WR. A comparison of the effects on central 5HT function of sibutramine hydrochloride and other weight-modifying agents. Br J Pharmac 1998; 25: 301-308,
28 Bickerdike MJ, Vickers SP, Dourish CT. 5-HT2c receptor modulation and the treatment of obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab 1999; 1: 207-214, MEDLINE
29 Pestell RG, Crock PA, Ward GM, Alford FP, Best JD. Fenfluramine increases insulin action in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1989; 12: 252-258, MEDLINE
30 Scheen AJ, Paolisso G, Salvatore T, Lefebvre PJ. Improvement of insulin-induced glucose disposal in obese patients with NIDDM after 1-wk treatment with d-fenfluramine. Diabetes Care 1991; 14: 325-332, MEDLINE
31 Kirby MJ, Turner P. Fenfluramine and nor-fenfluramine on glucose uptake into skeletal muscle. Postgrad Med J 1975; 5(Suppl 1): 73-76,
32 Sasson S, Kunievsky B, Nathan C, Cerasi E. On the role of 5-hydroxytrytamine in the peripheral action of fenfluramine: studies with the isolated rat soleus muscle. Biochem Pharmac 1990; 39: 965-968,
33 Rowley HL, Bulter SA, Prow MR, Aspley S, Kilpatrick IC, Heal DJ. A comparison of the effects of sibutramine and other weight-modifying drugs on extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens of freely-moving rats. Synapse 2000; 38: 167-176, MEDLINE
34 Kosmiski L, Eckel RH. Anorectic agents in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Cur Opin Endocrinol Diabetes 1997; 4: 36-39,
|
 |
| Figures |
 |
Figure 1 Effect of sibutramine and its metabolites M1 and M2 on 2-deoxyglucose uptake by L6 muscle cells after incubation for 24, 48 and 72 h with or without added insulin (10-8 M) for the last 24 h of the incubations. Values are mean±s.e.m., n=12. *P<0.05 vs control (no drug). |
Figure 2 Effect of insulin on 2-deoxyglucose uptake by L6 muscle cells after 24 h incubation with and without M2 (10-6 M). Values are mean±s.e.m., n=12. *P<0.05 vs insulin only. |
Figure 3 Effect of cytochalasin B on 2-deoxyglucose uptake by L6 muscle cells after incubation for 24 h with 10-6 M M2 and without M2. Values are mean±s.e.m., n=6. *P<0.05 vs without M2. |
Figure 4 Effect of LY-294,002 on 2-deoxyglucose uptake by L6 muscle cells after incubation for 24 h with 10-6 M M2 and without M2. Values are mean±s.e.m., n=6. *P<0.05 vs without M2. |
Figure 5 Effect of cycloheximide on 2-deoxyglucose uptake by L6 muscle cells after incubation for 24 h with 10-6 M M2 and without M2. Values are mean±s.e.m., n=6. *P<0.05 vs without M2. |
Figure 6 Effect of fluoxetine, nisoxetine, and fluoxetine combined with nisoxetine on 2-deoxyglucose uptake by L6 muscle cells after incubation for 24 h with and without added insulin (10-8 M). Values are mean±s.e.m., n=6. |
Figure 7 Effect of serotonin, dopamine and noradrenaline on 2-deoxyglucose uptake by L6 muscle cells after incubation for 24 h with and without added insulin (10-8 M). Values are mean±s.e.m. n=6. *P<0.05 vs control (no insulin); †P<0.05 vs insulin only. |
Figure 8 Effect of fenfluramine, nordexfenfluramine and phentermine on 2-deoxyglucose uptake by L6 muscle cells after incubation for 24 h with and without added insulin (10-8 M). Values are mean±s.e.m., n=6. †P<0.05 vs insulin only. |
 |
 |
 |
| Received 5 May 2000; revised 3 November 2000; accepted 7 November 2000 |
 |
| April 2001, Volume 25, Number 4, Pages 478-485 |
 |
| Table of contents Previous Article Next [PDF] |
|
|