Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Thinness and body shape of Playboy centerfolds from 1978 to 1998

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Changes in the body weight and shape of Playboy centerfolds over the past two decades (1978–1998) were examined.

METHODS: The body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip circumference ratio (WHR) were obtained from measurements reported by 240 centerfolds (ages 19–35 y).

RESULTS: The 20-y averages (mean±s.d.) were 18.1±0.8 kg/m2 for BMI and 0.68±0.03 for WHR, and there has been no appreciable change in either BMI or WHR in centerfolds over the past 20 y. Based on current recommendations for the classification of underweight (BMI<18.5 kg/m2), 70% of the centerfolds were underweight. Further, 77.5% of the centerfolds were <85% of their ideal body weight.

CONCLUSION: Given the perception of Playboy centerfolds as culturally ‘ideal’ women, the notion that 70% of them are underweight highlights the social pressures on women to be thin and helps to explain the high levels of body dissatisfaction and disordered eating among women.

International Journal of Obesity (2001) 25, 590–592

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization . Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation on Obesity, Geneva, 3–5 June 1997. World Health Organization: Geneva 1998.

  2. US National Institutes of Health . Clinical guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, MD 1998.

  3. Schreiber GB, Robins M, Striegel-Moore R, Obarzanek E, Morrison JA, Wright DJ . Weight modification efforts reported by black and white preadolescent girls: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study Pediatrics 1996 98: 63–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Strauss RS . Self-reported weight status and dieting in a cross-sectional sample of young adolescents: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999 153: 741–747.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Haberman S, Luffy D . Weighing in college students' diet and exercise behaviors J Am Coll Health 1998 46: 189–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Field AE, Cheung L, Wolf AM, Herzog DB, Gortmaker SL, Colditz GA . Exposure to the mass media and weight concerns among girls Pediatrics 1999 103: E36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Posavac HD, Posavac SS, Posavac EJ . Exposure to media images of female attractiveness and concern with body weight among young women Sex Roles 1998 38: 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh D . Body shape and women's attractiveness. The critical role of waist-to-hip ratio Hum Nature 1993 4: 297–321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh D . Is thin really beautiful and good? Relationship between waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and female attractiveness Pers Indiv Diff 1994 16: 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh D, Luis S . Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of waist-to-hip ratio on judgements of women's attractiveness Hum Nature 1995 6: 51–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Singh D, Young RK . Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breast, and hips: role in judgements of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships Ethnol Sociobiol 1995 16: 483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Garner DM, Garfinkel PE, Scwartz D, Thompson M . Cultural expectations of thinness in women Psychol Rep 1980 47: 483–491.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Silverstein B, Perdue L, Peterson B, Kelly E . The role of mass media in promoting a thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women Sex Roles 1986 14: 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wiseman CV, Gray JJ, Mosimann JE, Ahrens AH . Cultural expectations of thinness in women: an update Int J Eat Disord 1992 11: 85–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company . Metropolitan height and weight tables Stat Bull Metropolitan Life Insurance Co 1983 64: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Szabo CP . Playboy centrefolds and eating disorders—from male pleasure to female pathology S Afr Med J 1996 86: 838–839.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuczmarski RJ, Carroll MD, Flegal KM, Troiano RP . Varying body mass index cutoff points to describe overweight prevalence among US adults: NHANES III (1988 to 1994) Obes Res 1997 5: 542–548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kuczmarski RJ, Johnson CL . Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960–1994 Int J Obes Relat Metabol Disord 1998 22: 39–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barber N . Secular changes in standards of bodily attractiveness in American women: different masculine and feminine ideals J Psychol 1998 132: 87–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Troiano RP, Frongillo EA, Sobal J, Levitsky DA . The relationship between body weight and mortality: a quantitative analysis of combined information from existing studies Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1996 20: 63–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Roy Katzmarzyk for help with data collection and management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to PT Katzmarzyk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katzmarzyk, P., Davis, C. Thinness and body shape of Playboy centerfolds from 1978 to 1998. Int J Obes 25, 590–592 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801571

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801571

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links