|
|
|
| April 2000, Volume 24, Number 4, Pages 435-442 |
| Table of contents Previous Abstract Next Full text PDF |
 |
| Paper |
| Do we eat less fat, or just report so? |
 |
| B L Heitmann1,2,3, L Lissner4 and M Osler1,5 |
 |
1Unit for Dietary Studies at the The Copenhagen County Centre for Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine CF, Glostrup University Hospital, Denmark
2Institute of Preventive Medicine, Copenhagen Hospital Corporation, H:S Copenhagen Municipal Hospital, Denmark
3Research Department of Human Nutrition, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen Denmark
4Centre for Nutritional Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Göteborg University, Göteberg, Sweden
5Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
|
 |
Correspondence to: B L Heitmann, Unit for Dietary Studies at the Centre for Preventive Medicine, Glostrup University Hospital, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark. BeHe@Glostruphosp.KbhAmt.dk
|
 |
| Abstract |
 | OBJECTIVE: To examine secular trends in diet reporting error. METHODS: Dietary information was obtained from 228 Danish men and women in 1987-88, and from 122 men and women in 1993-94. RESULTS: Bias in dietary reporting of energy and protein intake was assessed by comparing reported intake with intake data, estimated from 24 h nitrogen output, validated by administering P-aminobenzoic acid, and estimated 24 h energy expenditure. Total energy was under-reported more than energy from protein at both surveys, suggesting that energy from other nutrients, like fat and/or carbohydrate, must have been under-reported too. There was a greater under-reporting for energy than for protein in 1993-94 (29%) than in 1987-88 (15%). Obesity was positively associated with under-reporting, both in 1987-88 and in 1993-94. CONCLUSION: The higher macro-nutrient specific error in 1993-94 compared to 1987-88 may reflect a trend to increasingly omitting fat and/or carbohydrate-rich foods in dietary reporting. This may be a consequence of increased awareness of diet intake, which, in turn, may be related to intensified public health campaigns to reduce intake of fat and/or simple carbohydrate. These results may have consequences for our understanding of the apparent decline in dietary fat and associated health benefits. International Journal of Obesity (2000)24, 435-442 |
 |
| Keywords |
 | secular trends; dietary under-reporting; obesity; macro-nutrient intakes |
|
 |
 |
 |
| Received 26 April 1999; revised 23 August 1999; accepted 4 November 1999 |
 |
| April 2000, Volume 24, Number 4, Pages 435-442 |
| Table of contents Previous Abstract Next Full text PDF |
|
|