Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
International Journal of Obesity
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 
December 2000, Volume 24, Number 12, Pages 1545-1552
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF
Paper
The role of low-fat diets in body weight control: a meta-analysis of ad libitum dietary intervention studies
A Astrup1, G K Grunwald2, E L Melanson2, W H M Saris3 and J O Hill2

1The Research Department of Human Nutrition and LMC, The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg, Denmark

2Center for Human Nutrition, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA

3University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: A Astrup, FHE, Rolighedsvej 30, 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ast@kvl.dk


A preliminary version of this meta-analysis was presented at the meeting 'Obesity and the Metabolic Syndrome, in Ystad, Sweden, 1999.42

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Low-fat high-carbohydrate diets are recommended to prevent weight gain in normal weight subjects and reduce body weight in overweight and obese. However, their efficacy is controversial. We evaluated the efficacy of ad libitum low-fat diets in reducing body weight in non-diabetic individuals from the results of intervention trials.

DESIGN: Studies were identified from a computerized search of the Medline database from January 1966 to July 1999 and other sources. Inclusion criteria were: controlled trials lasting more than 2 months comparing ad libitum low-fat diets as the sole intervention with a control group consuming habitual diet or a medium-fat diet ad libitum.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in changes in dietary fat intake, energy intake and body weight. Weighted mean differences for continuous data and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS: Two authors independently selected the studies meeting the inclusion criteria and extracted data from 16 trials (duration of 2-12 months) with 19 intervention groups, enrolling 1910 individuals. Fourteen were randomized. Weight loss was not the primary aim in 11 studies. Before the interventions the mean proportions of dietary energy from fat in the studies were 37.7% (95% CI, 36.9-38.5) in the low-fat groups, and 37.4% (36.4-38.4) in the control groups. The low-fat intervention produced a mean fat reduction of 10.2% (8.1-12.3). Low-fat intervention groups showed a greater weight loss than control groups (3.2 kg, 95% confidence interval 1.9-4.5 kg; P<0.0001), and a greater reduction in energy intake (1138 kJ/day, 95% confidence interval 564-1712 kJ/day, P=0.002). Having a body weight 10 kg higher than the average pre-treatment body weight was associated with a 2.6±0.8 kg (P=0.011) greater difference in weight loss.

CONCLUSION: A reduction in dietary fat without intentional restriction of energy intake causes weight loss, which is more substantial in heavier subjects.

International Journal of Obesity (2000) 24, 1545-1552

Keywords

low-fat diets; weight loss; obesity; humans; body weight regulation

Received 26 June 2000; revised 19 July 2000; accepted 19 July 2000
December 2000, Volume 24, Number 12, Pages 1545-1552
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF
Privacy Policy © 2000 Nature Publishing Group