Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
International Journal of Obesity
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 
June 1998, Volume 22, Number 6, Pages 520-528
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF
Paper
What is a healthy weight for middle aged women?
W J Browna, A J Dobson and G Mishra

Research Institute for Gender and Health, The University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia

aCorrespondence: Dr Wendy J Brown, Research Institute for Gender and Health, The University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore associations between body mass index (BMI) and selected indicators of health and well-being and to suggest a healthy weight range (based on BMI) for middle aged Australian women.

DESIGN: Population based longitudinal study (cross-sectional baseline data).

SUBJECTS: 13 431 women aged 45-49 y who participated in the baseline survey for the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.

RESULTS: Forty-eight percent of women had a BMI>25 kg/m2. Prevalence of medical problems (for example, hypertension, diabetes), surgical procedures (cholescystectomy, hysterectomy) and symptoms (for example, back pain) increased monotonically with BMI, while indicators of health care use (for example, visits to doctors) showed a 'J' shaped relationship with BMI. Scores for several sub-scales of the MOS short form health survey (SF36) (for example, general health, role limitations due to emotional difficulties, social function, mental health and vitality) were optimal when BMI was around 19-24 kg/m2. After adjustment for area of residence, education, smoking, exercise and menopausal status, low BMI was associated with fewer physical health problems than mid-level or higher BMI, and the nationally recommended BMI range of 20-25 was associated with optimum mental health, lower prevalence of tiredness and lowest use of health services.

CONCLUSIONS: Acknowledging the limitations of the cross-sectional nature of these data, the results firmly support the benefits of leanness in terms of reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and gall bladder disease. The findings are moderated, however, by the observation that both low and high BMI are associated with decreased vitality and poorer mental health. The optimal range for BMI appears to be about 19-24 kg/m2. From a public health perspective this study provides strong support for the recommended BMI range of 20-25 as an appropriate target for the promotion of healthy weight in middle aged Australian women.

Keywords

body mass index; women; middle age; morbidity

Received 20 May 1997; revised 12 January 1998; accepted 20 January 1998
June 1998, Volume 22, Number 6, Pages 520-528
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF
Privacy Policy © 1998 Nature Publishing Group