Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Men with diabetes may require more aggressive treatment for erectile dysfunction

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and erectile dysfunction (ED) are common health problems that markedly increase in prevalence and incidence with advancing age. DM is a known risk factor for developing ED; however, among men with ED it is unknown if DM alters the need for more invasive therapies. We sought to determine whether DM is associated with increased ED severity, reduced effectiveness of first-line (oral) therapies, and therefore higher utilization of second- and third-line therapies. The Inovus I3 database was queried to identify men with ED. Claims were followed for 48 months. Men with incomplete follow-up data and those diagnosed with DM after ED diagnosis were excluded from analysis. Rates of second-line (penile suppositories or injectables) and third-line (penile prostheses) ED therapies were compared between men with and without preexisting DM. Risk of progressing to second- and third-line therapies associated with DM was assessed with logistic regression and Kaplan–Meier analysis. From 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2006, 136 306 men were identified with prevalent and incident ED. Among this group, 19 236 men had DM that preceded their ED diagnosis. Men with DM were more than 50% more likely to be prescribed secondary ED treatments over the 2-year observation period, and more than twice as likely to undergo penile prosthesis surgery. Among a large population-based cohort of men with ED, those with DM are more likely to require more aggressive treatments. These data suggest that ED among men with diabetes may be less responsive to first-line treatments (oral agents), worsen more rapidly, or both.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. JAMA 1993; 270: 83–90.

  2. Lue TF . Erectile dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1802–1813.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, Krane RJ, McKinlay JB . Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol 1994; 151: 54–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Costabile RA . Optimizing treatment for diabetes mellitus induced erectile dysfunction. J Urol 2003; 170: S35–S38, discussion S9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Asimakopoulos AD, Miano R, Agro EF, Vespasiani G, Spera E . Does current scientific and clinical evidence support the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for the treatment of premature ejaculation? a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sex Med 2012; 9: 2404–2416.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldstein I, Lue TF, Padma-Nathan H, Rosen RC, Steers WD, Wicker PA Sildenafil Study Group. Oral sildenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1397–1404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saigal CS, Wessells H, Pace J, Schonlau M, Wilt TJ . Predictors and prevalence of erectile dysfunction in a racially diverse population. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166: 207–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Berardis G, Franciosi M, Belfiglio M, Di Nardo B, Greenfield S, Kaplan SH et al. Erectile dysfunction and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients: a serious problem too often overlooked. Diabetes Care 2002; 25: 284–291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fonseca V, Seftel A, Denne J, Fredlund P . Impact of diabetes mellitus on the severity of erectile dysfunction and response to treatment: analysis of data from tadalafil clinical trials. Diabetologia 2004; 47: 1914–1923.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown JS, Wessells H, Chancellor MB, Howards SS, Stamm WE, Stapleton AE et al. Urologic complications of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 177–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saenz de Tejada I, Goldstein I, Azadzoi K, Krane RJ, Cohen RA . Impaired neurogenic and endothelium-mediated relaxation of penile smooth muscle from diabetic men with impotence. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 1025–1030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fedele D, Coscelli C, Santeusanio F, Bortolotti A, Chatenoud L, Colli E et al. Erectile dysfunction in diabetic subjects in Italy. Gruppo Italiano Studio Deficit Erettile nei Diabetici. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 1973–1977.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Klein R, Klein BE, Lee KE, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ . Prevalence of self-reported erectile dysfunction in people with long-term IDDM. Diabetes Care 1996; 19: 135–141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller DC, Saigal CS, Litwin MS . The demographic burden of urologic diseases in America. Urol Clin North Am 2009; 36: 11–27, v.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Derby CA, Araujo AB, Johannes CB, Feldman HA, McKinlay JB . Measurement of erectile dysfunction in population-based studies: the use of a single question self-assessment in the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Int J Impot Res 2000; 12: 197–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T J Walsh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walsh, T., Hotaling, J., Smith, A. et al. Men with diabetes may require more aggressive treatment for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res 26, 112–115 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2013.46

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2013.46

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links