Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Intravesical penile implant reservoir: case report, literature review, and strategies for prevention

Abstract

To present a case of intravesical erosion of an infected multiple-component inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) reservoir. We retrospectively reviewed a case of complete intravesical erosion of an infected IPP reservoir. We also reviewed the prior urologic literature concerning bladder-related reservoir complications, and formulated potential strategies to prevent these complications in the future. This patient was successfully managed with complete explantation of the cylinders and pump, along with cystotomy, intravesical reservoir removal and cystorraphy. Several months later, he was successfully reimplanted with a multiple-component IPP, and, with 7 months follow-up, has had no further complications. Management of intravesical placement or erosion of an IPP reservoir should be tailored to the clinical scenario. In cases with peri-prosthetic infection and subsequent intravesical reservoir erosion, complete explantation and delayed subsequent reimplantation has been successful. Inadvertent intravesical reservoir placement has been successfully managed via immediate cystotomy, reservoir repositioning and cystorraphy. Reservoir insertion via a counter-incision, an infrapubic approach and under direct vision can avoid this complication. Bladder laceration during reservoir reinflation has been successfully managed with cystorraphy and reservoir repositioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leach GE, Shapiro CE, Hadley R, Raz S . Erosion of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir into bladder and bowel. J Urol 1984; 131: 1177–1178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fitch WP, Roddy T . Erosion of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir into bladder. J Urol 1986; 136: 1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Godiwalla SY, Beres J, Jacobs SC . Erosion of an inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir into an ileal conduit. J Urol 1987; 137: 297–298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dupont MC, Hochman HI . Erosion of an inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir into the bladder, presenting as bladder calculi. J Urol 1988; 139: 367–368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Munoz JJ, Ellsworth PI . The retained penile prosthesis reservoir: a risk. Urol 2000; 55: 949.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones L, Ryan R, Ghobriel A, Wilson SK . The retained reservoir in inflatable penile prosthesis explantation. J Urol 2002; 167 (4 Suppl): 150, abstract 601.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rajpurkar A, Bianco FF, Al-Omar O, Terlecki R, Dhabuwala C . Fate of the retained reservoir after replacement of 3-piece penile prosthesis. J Urol 2004; 172: 664–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brusky J, Dikranin A, Aboseif S . Retrieval of inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir from the bladder. Int J Impot Res 2005; 17: 302–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Park JK, Jang SW, Lee SW, Cui Y . Rare complication of multiple revision surgeries of penile prosthesis. J Sex Med 2005; 2: 735–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kramer AC, Chason J, Kusakabe A . Report of two cases of bladder perforation caused by reservoir of inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 2064–2067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eldefrawy A, Kava BR . An unusual complication during inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Urol 2010; 76: 847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Henry GD, Donatucci CF, Conners W, Greenfield JM, Carson CC, Wilson SK et al. An outcomes analysis of over 200 revision surgeries for penile prosthesis implantation: a multicenter study. J Sex Med 2012; 9: 309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Volk S . The Legacy. Philadelphia Magazine October 2008; 79–126.

  14. Wilson SK, Costerton JW . Biofilm and penile prosthesis infections in the era of coated implants: a review. J Sex Med 2012; 9: 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Garber BB . Inflatable penile prosthesis: site-specific malfunction analysis. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15: 22–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Perito PE . Ectopic reservoir placement—no longer in the space of Retzius. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 2395–2398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B B Garber.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Dr Bruce Garber has served as an occasional consultant to Coloplast and to American Medical Systems. Dr Andrew Morris declares no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garber, B., Morris, A. Intravesical penile implant reservoir: case report, literature review, and strategies for prevention. Int J Impot Res 25, 41–44 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2012.31

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2012.31

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links