Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Assessment of sexual function/dysfunction via patient reported outcomes

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 20, pages 35–44 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

The recent recognition of the high prevalence of sexual dysfunctions and disorders in our society, along with the substantial investment of the pharmaceutical industry in the field of sexual functioning, has resulted in a significant expansion in the development of valid and reliable measures of sexual function/dysfunction. The instruments tend to be brief self-report inventories, typically requiring 10–20 min of patient time for completion. Most measures were initially developed as screening and outcomes measures for use in clinical drug trials of new treatments for sexual dysfunction, but are beginning to see more widespread use in the clinic. All these instruments must adhere to recently prescribed rigorous guidelines set forth by the Food and Drug Administration, and have been demonstrated to be valid and reliable indicators of the status and quality of sexual functioning in both men and women. The constructs that form the framework of our diagnostic system for sexual dysfunctions are not amenable to direct physical measurement, so that currently they must be assessed via these self-report scales. Although not as precise as physical measures, these inventories do an admirable job of quantifying and registering sexual functioning status in a concise and reliable manner, and have become indispensable tools in our clinical and research programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. DuBois PH . A History of Psychological Testing. Allyn & Bacon: Boston, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Galton F . Inquiries into Human Faculty and its Development. MacMillan: NY, 1883.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Cattell JM . Mental tests and measurements. Mind 1890; 15: 373–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kempf EJ . The behavior chart in mental diseases. Am J Insanity 1914–1915; 7: 761–772.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Woodworth RS . Personal Data Sheet. Stoelting: Chicago, 1918.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC . Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. J Am Med Assoc 1999; 281: 537–544.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). February Guidance for industry patient reported outcomes measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER): Rockville, MD, 2006.

  8. Davis CM, Yarber WL, Bauserman R, Schreer G, Davis S (eds). Handbook of Sexuality-Related Measures. Sage Publications Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. ICD-10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. World Health Organization: Geneva, 1992.

  10. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association: WA.

  11. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. Impotence. J Am Med Assoc 1993; 270: 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Basson R, Berman J, Burnett A, Derogatis L, Ferguson D, Fourcroy J et al. Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications. J Urol 2000; 163: 888–893.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Masters WH, Johnson VE . Human Sexual Response. Little Brown: Boston, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Masters WH, Johnson VE . Human Sexual Inadequacy. Little Brown: Boston, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kaplan HS . Disorders of Sexual Desire. Brunner/Mazel: New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Derogatis LR, Burnett AL . Key methodologic issues in sexual medicine research. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Utian WH, MacLean DB, Symonds T, Symons J, Somayji V, Sission M . A methodology study to validate a structured diagnostic method used to diagnose female sexual dysfunction and its subtypes in post-menopausal women. J Sex Marital Ther 2005; 31: 271–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Derogatis LR, Culpepper WJ . Psychological tests in screening for psychiatric disorders. In: Maruish M (ed). The Use of Psychological Testing for Outcomes Assessment and Treatment Planning. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nunnally J . Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill: NY, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McGahuey CA, Gelenberg AJ, Laukes CA, Moreno FA, Delgado PL . The Arizona sexual experience scale (ASEX): reliability and validity. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 25–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Corty EW, Althof SE, Kurit DM . The reliability and validity of a sexual functioning questionnaire. J Sex Marital Ther 1996; 22: 27–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Glick HA, McCarron TJ, Althof SE, Corty EW, Willke RJ . Construction of scales for the Center for Marital and Sexual Health (CMASH) Sexual Functioning Questionnaire. J Sex Marital Ther 1997; 23: 103–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Derogatis LR . The Derogatis interview for sexual functioning (DISF, DISF-SR): an introductory report. J Sex Marital Ther 1997; 23: 291–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 191–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Meston CM . Validation of the female sexual function index (FSFI) in women with female orgasmic disorder and women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Marital Ther 2003; 29: 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Althof S, Rosen R, Symonds T, Mundayat R, May K, Abraham L . Development and validation of a new questionnaire to assess sexual satisfaction, control, and distress associated with premature ejaculation. J Sex Med 2006; 3: 465–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A . The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997; 49: 822–830.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Gendrano III N . The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a state-of-the-science review. Int J Impot Res 2002; 14: 226–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dennerstein L, Lehert P, Dudley E . Short scale to measure female sexuality: adapted from McCoy female sexuality questionnaire. J Sex Marital Ther 2001; 27: 339–351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dennerstein L, Anderson-Hunt M, Dudley E . Evaluation of a short scale to assess female sexual functioning. J Sex Marital Ther 2002; 28: 389–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Derogatis LR, Rust J, Golombok S, Davis S, Bouchard N, Rodenberg C et al. Validation of the profile of female sexual function (PFSF) in surgically and naturally menopausal women. J Sex Marital Ther 2004; 30: 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. McHorney CA, Rust J, Golombok S, Davis S, Bouchard C, Brown C et al. Profiles of female sexual function: a patient-based, international, psychometric instrument for the assessment of hypoactive sexual desire in oophorectomized women. Menopause 2004; 11: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Golombok S, Derogatis L, Rodenberg C, Koochaki P, Schmitt S, Rust J . Development and validation of a new screening tool for hypoactive sexual desire disorder: the brief profile of female sexual function© (B-PFSF©). Gynecol Endocrinol 2007 (in press).

  34. Quirk FH, Heiman JR, Rosen RC, Laan E, Smith MD, Boolell M . Development of a sexual function questionnaire for clinical trials of female sexual dysfunction. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2002; 11: 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sills T, Wunderlich G, Pyke R, Segraves RT, Leiblum S, Clayton A et al. The sexual interest and desire inventory—female (SIDI-F): item response analysis of data from women diagnosed with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med 2005; 2: 801–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Clayton AH, Segraves RT, Leiblum S, Basson R, Pyke R, Cotton D et al. Relaibility and validity of the sexual interest and desire inventory-female (SIDI-F): a scale designed to measure severity of female hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Marital Ther 2006; 32: 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Derogatis LR, Rosen R, Leiblum S, Burnett A, Heiman J . The female sexual distress scale (FSDS): initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. J Sex Marital Ther 2002; 28: 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Althof S, Rosen R, Derogatis LR, Corrty E, Quirk F, Symonds T . Outcomes measurement in female sexual dysfunction clinical trials: review and recommendations. J Sex Marital Ther 2005; 31: 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sheppard Pratt Health System and Department of Psychiatry, Center for Sexual Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

    L R DeRogatis

Authors
  1. L R DeRogatis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L R DeRogatis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeRogatis, L. Assessment of sexual function/dysfunction via patient reported outcomes. Int J Impot Res 20, 35–44 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901591

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901591

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links