Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Mode of delivery and subsequent long-term sexual function of primiparous women

Abstract

Minimal information exists on unintended health consequences following childbirth, particularly in relation to mode of delivery. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of mode of delivery on long-term sexual satisfaction of women by using a validated questionnaire. Forty-five primiparous women who had cesarean deliveries and 90 primiparous women who had vaginal deliveries with mediolateral episiotomies enrolled in the study. Quality of sexual relations and sexual satisfaction were self-reported by using Golombock–Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction. Prevalence of sexual dissatisfaction was compared between the two groups and logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify the predictors of sexual dissatisfaction. The prevalence of overall sexual dissatisfaction was 4.4% in cesarean group while it was 14.4% in vaginal delivery group (P=0.081). Vaginal delivery group demonstrated a trend toward higher prevalence of dissatisfaction in all subscales except sensuality area than cesarean group, however, differences between two groups did not reach to statistical significance. Degree of pleasure for relationship with the spouse was identified as a significant predictor for overall sexual dissatisfaction (P=0.008). Our findings suggest that sexual dissatisfaction should not be assumed simply a product of the delivery mode. Individual, socio-demographic, lifestyle and marital characteristics should also be taken into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moran CF, Holt VL, Martin DP . What do women want to know after childbirth? Birth 1997; 24: 27–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Glazener CM . Sexual function after childbirth: Women's experiences, persistent morbidity and lack of professional recognition. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 104: 330–335.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Klein MC, Gauthier RJ, Robbins JM, Kaczorowski J, Jorgensen SH, Franco ED et al. Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 171: 591–598.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goetsch MF . Postpartum dyspareunia: an unexplored problem. J Reprod Med 1999; 44: 963–968.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Waterstone M, Wolfe C, Hooper R, Bewley S . Postnatal morbidity after childbirth and severe obstetric morbidity. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 110: 128–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrett G, Pendry E, Peacock J, Victor CR, Thakar R, Manyonda I . Women's sexual health after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 107: 186–195.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lyndon-Rochelle MT, Holt VL, Martin DP . Delivery method and self-reported postpartum general health status among primiparous women. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2001; 15: 232–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrett G, Peacock J, Victor CR, Manyonda I . Cesarean section and postnatal sexual health. Birth 2005; 32: 306–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sultan AH, Stanton SL . Preserving the pelvic floor and perineum during childbirth – elective cesarean section? Br J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 103: 731–734.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ludwig H, Loeffler FE . Cesarean section on demand – an ethical dilemma. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2001; 264: 169–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Husslein P . Elective cesarean section versus vaginal delivery: whether the end of traditional obstetrics. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2001; 265: 169–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bewley S, Cockburn J . The unfacts of ‘request’ cesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 109: 597–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Minkoff H, Chervenak FA . Elective primary cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 946–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Klein MC . Quick fix culture: the cesarean-section-on demand debate. Birth 2004; 31: 161–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown S, Lumley J . Maternal health after childbirth: results of an Australian population based survey. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 105: 156–161.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Signorello LB, Harlow BL, Chekos AK, Repke JT . Postpartum sexual functioning and its relationship to perineal trauma: a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184: 881–888; (discussion 888–890).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thompson JF, Roberts CL, Currie M, Ellwood DA . Prevalence and persistence of health problems after childbirth: associations with parity and method of birth. Birth 2002; 29: 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Morof D, Barrett G, Peacock J, Victor CR, Manyonda I . Postnatal depression and sexual health after childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 1318–1325.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Connolly AM, Thorp J, Pahel L . Effects of pregnancy and childbirth on postpartum sexual function: a longitudinal prospective study. Int Urogynecol J 2005; 16: 263–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hicks TL, Goodall SF, Quattrone EM, Lydon-Rochelle MT . Postpartum sexual functioning and method of delivery: summary of the evidence. J Midwifery Womens Health 2004; 49: 430–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rust J, Golombok S . The GRISS: a psychometric instrument for the assessment of sexual dysfunction. Arch Sex Behav 1986; 15: 157–165.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tugrul C, Oztan N, Kabakci E . The standardization study of Golombok–Rust inventory of sexual satisfaction. Turkish J Psychiatry 1993; 4: 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  23. SPSS Inc. Statistical Package for Social Scientists for Windows. Version 10.0, Chicago: Author, 2003.

  24. Baytur YB, Deveci A, Uyar Y, Ozcakir HT, Kizilkaya S, Caglar H . Mode of delivery and pelvic floor muscle strength and sexual function after childbirth. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2005; 88: 276–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Buhling KJ, Schmidt S, Robinson JN, Klapp C, Siebert G, Dudenhausen JW . Rate of dyspareunia after delivery in primiparae according to mode of delivery. Eur J Obstet Gyn Reprod Biol 2006; 124: 42–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schytt E, Lindmark G, Waldenström U . Physical symptoms after childbirth: prevalence and associations with self-rated health. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 112: 210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Clarkson J, Newton C, Bick D, Gyte G, Kettle C, Newburn M et al. Achieving sustainable quality in maternity services using audit of incontinence and dyspareunia to identify shortfalls in meeting standards. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2001; 1: 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Gungor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gungor, S., Baser, I., Ceyhan, S. et al. Mode of delivery and subsequent long-term sexual function of primiparous women. Int J Impot Res 19, 358–365 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901546

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901546

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links