Original Research

International Journal of Impotence Research (2004) 16, 365–368. doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901163 Published online 12 February 2004

Possible hemodynamic pathways of intraurethral prostaglandin-E1 (MUSE™)

T Bschleipfer1, H-U Cimniak1, R Beckert1, E W Hauck2, W Weidner2 and C Sparwasser1

  1. 1Department of Urology, Ulm Military Hospital, Oberer Eselsberg, Ulm/Donau, Germany
  2. 2Department of Urology, Justus Liebig University, Rudolf-Buchheim-Str., Giessen, Germany

Correspondence: EW Hauck, MD, Department of Urology, Justus Liebig University, Rudolf-Buchheim-Str. 7, 35385 Giessen, Germany. E-mail: Ekkehard.W.Hauck@chiru.med.uni-giessen.de

Received 3 May 2003; Revised 6 July 2003; Accepted 6 August 2003; Published online 12 February 2004.

Top

Abstract

Intraurethral application of prostaglandin-E1 (MUSE™) is a well-tolerated pharmacotherapy for erectile dysfunction. However, the physiological mechanisms of drug transfer into the cavernous bodies are not completely clear. Using spongiosography in 35 patients, our study tried to elucidate existing shunt mechanisms. The X-rays show venous drainage through the deep dorsal vein up to the plexus Santorini. The circumflex veins are also contrasted and the cavernous bodies show opacification in their distal portion only. Structures shunting directly between the corpus spongiosum and the cavernous bodies were not demonstrable. Retrograde filling of the cavernous bodies through the deep dorsal vein and its circumflex braches seems to be the most relevant way of drug transfer after intraurethral application of prostaglandin-E1. Diffusion into the cavernous bodies or a systemic mechanism of action does not seem probable.

Keywords:

intraurethral prostaglandin-E1, MUSE™, hemodynamic pathways, spongiosography

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT