Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Research
  • Published:

Distribution of the Brief Male Sexual Inventory in community men

International Journal of Impotence Research volume 15, pages 185–191 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to characterize male sexual functioning as related to age in community-dwelling older men. In 1989, a random sample of men aged 40–79 y (n=2115) without prior prostate surgery, prostate cancer, or other conditions known to affect voiding function (except benign prostatic hyperplasia) was invited (55% agreed) to participate in the Olmsted County Study of Urinary Symptoms and Health Status Among Men. In 1996, a previously validated male sexual function questionnaire was administered to the cohort. The questionnaire has 11 questions measuring sexual drive (two questions); erectile function (three) and ejaculatory function (two), as well as assessing problems with sex drive, erections, or ejaculation (three); and overall satisfaction with sex life (one). Each question is scored on a scale of 0–4, with higher scores indicating better functioning. Cross-sectional age-specific means (±s.d.) for drive, erections, ejaculation, problems, and overall satisfaction declined from 5.2 (±1.5), 9.8 (±2.5), 7.4 (±1.4), 10.7 (±2.2), and 2.6 (±1.0), respectively, for men in their 40s to 2.4 (±1.6), 3.3 (±3.4), 3.6 (±3.2), 7.7 (±3.8), and 2.1 (±1.2) for men 70 y and older (all P<0.001). The cross-sectional decline in function with age was not constant, with age-related patterns differing by domain. The percentage of men reporting erections firm enough to have intercourse in the past 30 days declined from 97% (454/468) among those in their 40s to 51% (180/354) among those in their 80s (P<0.001). In age-adjusted analyses, men reporting regular sexual partners had statistically significantly higher levels of sex drive, erectile function, ejaculatory function, and overall satisfaction than those who did not report regular sexual partners. Sexual drive, erectile functioning, ejaculatory functioning, and overall sexual satisfaction in men show somewhat differing cross-sectional patterns of decline with advancing age. Active sexual functioning is maintained well into the 80s in a substantial minority of community-dwelling men.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Panser LA et al. Sexual function of men ages 40 to 79 years: The Olmsted County Study of Urinary Symptoms and Health Status Among Men. JAGS 1995; 43: 1107–1111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Macfarlane GJ et al. The relationship between sexual life and urinary condition in the French community. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1171–1176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Feldman HA et al. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol 1997; 151: 54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frankel SJ et al. Sexual dysfunction in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 677–685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Masumori N et al. Decline of sexual function with age in Japanese men compared with American men–results of two community-based studies. Urology 1999; 54: 335–344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Laumann EO, Paik A, Rosen RC . Sexual dysfunction in the United States: prevalence and predictors. JAMA 1999; 281: 537–544.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Braun M et al. Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: results of the ‘Cologne Male Survey’. Int J Impot Res 2000; 12: 305–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Parazzini F et al. Frequency and determinants of erectile dysfunction in Italy. Eur Urol 2000; 37: 43–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blanker MH et al. Erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction in a community-based sample of men 50 to 78 years old: prevalence, concern, and relation to sexual activity. Urology 2001; 57: 763–768.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Persson G . Sexuality in a 70-year old urban population. J Psychosom Res 1980; 24: 335–342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pfeiffer E, Verwoerdt A, Davis GC . Sexual behavior in aged men and women. Arch Gen Psych 1968; 19: 735–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Morley JE . Impotence. Am J Med 1986; 80: 897–905.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koskimaki J, Hakama M, Huhtala H, Tammela TLJ . Effect of erectile dysfunction on frequency of intercourse: a population based prevalence study in Finland. J Urol 2000; 164: 367–370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. O'Leary MP et al. A brief male sexual function inventory for urology. Urology 1995; 46: 697–706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chute CG et al. The prevalence of prostatism: a population-based survey of urinary symptoms. J Urol 1993; 150: 85–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobsen SJ et al. Natural history of prostatism: risk factors for acute urinary retention. J Urol 1997; 158: 481–487.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Project supported by research grants from the Public Health Service, Grants AR30582 and DK58859 from the National Institutes of Health and Merck Research Labs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Urology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    M P O'Leary

  2. Department of Epidemiology, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, Pennsylvania, USA

    T Rhodes & C J Girman

  3. Department of Health Services Research, Division of Epidemiology and Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

    C J Girman, D J Jacobson, R O Roberts & S J Jacobsen

  4. Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

    M M Lieber

Authors
  1. M P O'Leary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T Rhodes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C J Girman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D J Jacobson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. R O Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M M Lieber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. S J Jacobsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T Rhodes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Leary, M., Rhodes, T., Girman, C. et al. Distribution of the Brief Male Sexual Inventory in community men. Int J Impot Res 15, 185–191 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900996

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900996

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links