Neurophysiologic examinations in differential diagnosis of erectile dysfunction comprise electromyogramme of the pelvic floor, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) and evaluation of pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP). We focused our interest on comparing diagnostic importance of penile and perianal pudendal nerve SSEP. We examined 20 patients suffering from erectile dysfunction and 20 patients without any manifestation of impotence. The stimulus was administered using penile ring electrodes at the base of the penis (cathode) and distally on the penis shaft (anode), as well as a perianal surface electrode applied at 3 o'clock in lithotomy position and 5 cm laterally on the gluteal skin. The potentials were recorded with intradermal needle electrodes at Cz-2 cm (different) and Fz (indifferent). 500 stimuli were averaged for a single tracing. The stimulus strength was set at an average of 3-4 times the stimulus threshold. Cortical latency of P 40 ranged from 39.0 to 45.6 ms (penile) and from 33.6 to 43.2 ms (perianal) in the control group, in the patient group latencies ranged from 38.8 to 51.6 (penile) and 34.0 to 44.8 ms (perianal). In two patients no potential was recordable after perianal stimulation, one patient showed a marked prolongation of the penile response with a normal perianal latency. Penile and perianal latencies of P 40 were significantly prolongued in the patient group compared to the control group (P<0.05). The combination of penile and perianal pudendal SSEP may provide valuable additional information in differential diagnosis of erectile dysfunction, especially allowing to identify different sites of neurogenic lesions. In contrast to perianal pudendal SSEP, penile stimulation may help to discover pathologic changes in the distal course of the pudendal nerve, especially the dorsal nerve of the penis. International Journal of Impotence Research (2001) 13, 89-92 | 
