Introduction

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a syndrome defined as cognitive decline greater than expected for an individual's age and education level that does not notably interfere with activities of daily life.1 MCI is classified into four subtypes: amnestic MCI involving only memory impairment (single domain) or memory impairment along with deficits in another cognitive domain such as language function, visuospatial skills, or executive function (multiple domain) and non-amnestic MCI involving discrete cognitive impairments in single or multiple domains other than memory function.2 MCI prevalence has been estimated to be between 6 and 10% based on community assessments,3 a frequency about four times that of dementia. MCI also exhibits Alzheimer-type dementia-like neuropathology on autopsy, and at least half of those diagnosed with MCI, in particular amnestic MCI subtype, eventually progress into Alzheimer-type dementia (AD) with a smaller percentage progression to other forms of dementia, such as vascular dementia, frontotemporal dementia or dementia with Lewy bodies.2 Early detection of amnestic MCI in the transition phase between healthy aging and dementia is essential in the secondary prevention of dementia. Although no disease-modifiable treatment specifically targeting degenerative dementia has been discovered, control of risk factors such as isolated systolic hypertension is known to be associated with a decrease in incidence of dementia.4

Blood pressure (BP) instability has been hypothesized to be associated with MCI due to the traditional cardiovascular risk factors common to both, including arterial stiffness,5 hypertension6 and diabetes mellitus.7 Matsubayashi et al.8 reported a significant association between postural dysregulation in systolic BP and low scores on neurobehavioral functional tests among elderly with no cognitive impairment. Few reports, however, have investigated the association between circadian BP variation and MCI in the general population.

Here, we analyzed the possible association between nocturnal BP profile and amnestic MCI in community-dwelling middle-aged to elderly general subjects with no definitive dementia.

Methods

Study subjects

The study enrolled 144 middle-aged to elderly persons (aged 50 years) with no definitive dementia (Table 1). Subjects were participants in the Ehime University Hospital medical checkup program, which is provided to residents of Ehime Prefecture, Japan, and is specifically designed to evaluate aging-related disorders such as atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease and MCI. Among participants (aged 50 years) from February 2006 to August 2008 (8 persons per week), who provided informed consent (n=761), those who had no history of symptomatic cerebrovascular disease and definitive dementia (n=759, 99.7%), underwent MCI screening (n=461, 60.6%) and ambulatory BP monitoring (n=239, 31.4%), completed all clinical measurement and genotyping (n=227, 29.8%) and were not receiving antihypertensive treatment (n=144, 18.9%) were enrolled in the analysis. All clinical data used in this study were obtained through the checkup process. This cross-sectional investigation was carried out as part of the Shimanami Health Promoting Program (J-SHIPP Study), a longitudinal study evaluating factors related to cardiovascular disease, dementia and death.9 This series of studies was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of study subjects categorized by nocturnal BP profile

Assessment of MCI

MCI was assessed by the Japanese version of the MCI screen (MCIS),10, 11, 12 a 10-min long, computationally scored, staff-administered test. Validity and specificity in the differentiation of normal aging from MCI and mild dementia are described elsewhere. The overall accuracy in discriminating both amnestic and mixed cognitive domain types of MCI from normal aging is 97%.10 The MCIS has been translated into Japanese and cross validation has been confirmed using the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale as a reference (overall accuracy 96.4%).12

24-h ambulatory BP monitoring

Ambulatory BP was monitored using a cuff-oscillometric device (TM-2431; A&D, Tokyo, Japan), a fully automatic device that was pre-set to measure BP and heart rate every 15 min during the day (0700 to 2000 hours) and every 30 min at night. Outliers of ambulatory BP reading were rejected using an A&D method; a most widely used simple rejection method that excludes BP readings outside of a specified range.13 Sleep duration was assessed by individual interview, and overall averages of 24-h, awake and sleeping ambulatory BP values were calculated for each individual. The percentage decline in nocturnal BP was calculated with the following equation: ((daytime BP−nighttime BP) × 100)/daytime BP. Subjects were classified into four groups based on nocturnal systolic BP decline: extreme dipper, with a decline in nocturnal systolic BP 20%; dipper, 10–19%; non-dipper, none to 9% and riser, increase in nocturnal systolic BP.14

Measurement of arterial stiffness

Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) was measured as an index of arterial stiffness and calculated using the time interval between the wave fronts of the brachial and ankle waveforms and the path length from the brachium to the ankle. The path lengths from the suprasternal notch to the brachium (Lb) and ankle (La) were obtained using the following formulas: Lb=0.2195 × height−2.0734 and La=0.8129 × height+12.328. A significant and strong correlation between the baPWV and carotid-femoral PWV has been reported.15 A brief explanation of this device as well as the validity and reproducibility of its measurements have been provided elsewhere.16

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using a QIAamp DNA blood kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP; T334C [Cys112Arg], rs429358) on the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene was analyzed using the TaqMan probe assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with commercially available primers and probes purchased from the Assay-on-Demand system (C_3084793_20). The fluorescence level of PCR products was measured using an ABI PRISM 7900HT sequence detector (Applied Biosystems). The APOE isotype-related genotypes are combinations of the APOE ɛ2, ɛ3 and ɛ4 alleles derived from the two genotypes of the rs429358 (T334C) and rs7412 (C472T): ɛ2, 334T/472T; ɛ3, 334T/472C and ɛ4, 334C/472C. Risk genotype for AD (ɛ4) was detected by analyzing the SNP rs429358 (T334C). Frequency of homozygotes and heterozygotes of the ɛ4 genotype in our subjects was 2.8% (n=4) and 20.8% (n=30), respectively (P-value for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium is 0.277).

Statistical analysis

Values are listed as mean±standard deviation. Analysis of variance was used to assess differences in numeric variables among groups, whereas the χ2-test was used to assess frequency differences. Factors independently associated with MCI were assessed by logistic regression analysis. All analyses were conducted using commercially available statistical software (JMP version 7, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A two-tailed P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical characteristics of study subjects categorized by nocturnal BP profile are summarized in Table 1. No significant differences were observed in age, sex or body mass index (BMI) among these four groups. However, frequency of type II diabetes was significantly higher in subjects with an abnormal nocturnal BP pattern (16.5%) than in dippers (1.9%, P=0.007). Non-dippers and risers also showed significantly higher clinic measured systolic BP and baPWV.

Clinical characteristics of the 38 subjects diagnosed with MCI are summarized in Table 2. A mini-mental state examination (MMSE) was administered to a small number of randomly selected subjects (n=29), and subjects with MCI showed lower MMSE scores (mean score, 28.0±2.5) than the normal controls (29.7±0.6). Further, MCI subjects were significantly older, more diabetic and more often had the APOE ɛ4 genotype. MCI subjects also showed significantly higher ambulatory measured, but not clinic measured, systolic BP. Significant correlation was also observed between MCI and baPWV.

Table 2 Clinical characteristics of study subjects with MCI

Although MCI subjects showed significantly higher average systolic BP over 24 h, no marked differences were observed in the percent changes in nocturnal BP. However, the frequency of MCI was significantly higher and a J-shaped relationship was observed between these two parameters (Figure 1). Multiple logistic regression analysis for MCI was performed to further clarify the factors independently associated with MCI, including APOE ɛ4 genotype and other possible confounding factors (Table 3). An abnormal nocturnal BP pattern was identified as an independent and potent determinant of MCI, with an odds ratio (3.062).

Figure 1
figure 1

Frequency of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) subjects by nocturnal blood pressure (BP) pattern. Nocturnal BP pattern was defined as follows: extreme dipper, with a decline in nocturnal systolic BP 20%; dipper, 10–19%; non-dipper, 0–9% and riser, increase in nocturnal systolic BP. The number of subjects in each group is represented in each column. Overall P-value assessed by χ2-test was 0.018.

Table 3 Multiple logistic regression analysis for MCI

Discussion

Here, we analyzed the possible association between nocturnal BP profile and amnestic MCI in community-dwelling middle-aged to elderly subjects with no definitive dementia. Results showed that both a blunted nocturnal BP decline, namely, non-dipping and increase in nocturnal BP, and extreme drop in BP were related to MCI; J-shaped relationship between nocturnal BP change and frequency of MCI. To our knowledge, this study is the first to identify a J-shaped relationship between nocturnal BP profile and MCI.

Although several attempts have been made to discern the mechanisms leading to a decline in cognitive performance in the elderly, most have been focused on cholinergic dysfunction,17 neurodegenerative disease,18, 19 cerebrovascular disease18 and mutations in APOE alleles.20 Arterial stiffness assessed by PWV has also been suggested to contribute to the progression of cognitive impairment.5 Here, however, we found that although the baPWV of MCI subjects was significantly higher than that of normal controls, the significance of this association was lost on adjustment for age. Further, BP was found not to be an independent determinant for MCI. The inverse relationship between BP and cognitive function previously found in longitudinal epidemiological studies may be unrecognizable in cross-sectional observational studies, presumably due to BP instability in the phases shortly before dementia, possibly related to a central dysregulation of prefrontal autonomic centers.21 Although we found no association between MCI and BP or baPWV, the prognostic significance of these parameters remains to be elucidated.

In contrast, we identified a marked association between abnormal nocturnal BP profile and MCI, an observation in agreement with the concept that early dementia is preceded by BP instability. An association has been reported between cognitive decline and increased BP variability as assessed by standard deviation of 24-h BP readings.22 These results lend support to our present finding that abnormalities in cognitive function are associated with a dysregulation in nocturnal BP profile.

However, the association of an extreme drop in nocturnal BP with cognitive decline remains to be determined. Among studies to date, van Boxtel et al.23 reported lower levels of cognitive function in non-dippers than in dippers, but did not separately analyze the effects of extreme dipping. Furthermore, Nagai et al.24 reported a positive association between the percent changes in nocturnal BP (as a numeric variable) and MMSE score in untreated hypertensive subjects, but again did not separately analyze the effects of an extreme decrease in BP. In this study, changes in nocturnal BP itself did not differ between MCI subjects and normal controls (Table 2) due to the high prevalence of MCI among not only non-dippers and risers but also extreme dippers (Figure 1). These discrepancies between the previous and present studies may have been partly due to differences in subject profile. However, extreme dippers are often given a poor prognosis in regard to the subsequent development of cerebrovascular disease25 and senile-onset depression26 that is frequently accompanied by cognitive decline. On this basis, both an extreme drop and a non-dipping pattern in nocturnal BP should be considered related to cognitive decline. Although the relationship between cerebral hypoperfusion and dementia has not been fully elucidated,27, 28 lower nocturnal BP may cause dementia through cerebral hypoperfusion or may conversely be consequent to incipient dementia.

Underlying mechanisms relating abnormal nocturnal BP profile and MCI are uncertain. Sander et al.29 reported a positive association between abnormal nocturnal BP patterns with extent of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly persons. Kario et al.30 reported a higher frequency of asymptomatic lacunar infarction in elderly subjects with non-dipping profiles. These authors also found that reduced total brain matter was involved in the association between blunted nocturnal BP changes and lower MMSE score.24 Furthermore, in a recent longitudinal analysis found that increased white matter hyperintensities could be a predictor of progression from normal to MCI.31 Association of silent cerebral infarctions with the development of MCI was also reported in another community-based longitudinal study.32 By considering these findings together with our present data, asymptomatic cerebrovascular damages were thought to be one of possible mechanisms explainable for the relation between abnormal nocturnal BP profile and MCI in apparently healthy elderly persons.

Subjects of this study had no history of symptomatic cerebrovascular disease, and none were diagnosed as multiple domain-impaired amnestic MCI or non-amnestic MCI. As amnestic MCI eventually progress into AD with a smaller percentage progression to other forms of dementia, abnormal nocturnal BP profile may therefore predict future development of AD type dementia, but not vascular type dementia.33

In this study, incidence of MCI was highest among risers. As a group, risers were slightly older and had higher baPWV. Among the others, non-dippers also showed high baPWV, whereas no marked difference was observed between extreme dippers and dippers (Table 1). The mechanism underlying the relationship between blunted nocturnal BP drop and MCI may thus differ somewhat with that of extreme dippers, that is, advanced arteriosclerosis and cerebral arterial remodeling in risers and non-dippers,34 and cerebral hypoperfusion due to the nocturnal BP fall in extreme dippers.28, 35 Recently, excessive sympathetic activation was represented to be a factor potentially responsible for the day–night BP difference.36 Associations of salt sensitivity and sodium loadings with non-dipping profile were also reported.37, 38, 39 Furthermore, it was also reported that extreme dippers frequently complicate orthostatic hypertension.40 Autonomic dysfunction and consequent circadian BP dysreguration may represent a brain abnormality.

MCI is diagnosed as a level of cognitive deterioration not severe enough to consistently impair daily productivity and instrumental activities of daily living, but of sufficient severity to be noticeable by others and measurable by psychometric and other clinical assessments.41 Although MMSE is frequently used to assess cognitive function in clinical studies, its sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing MCI from normal aging has been reported as 71 and 85%, respectively.10 In this study, however, MCIS had a higher accuracy than MMSE in differentiating MCI (overall accuracy in Japanese subjects is 96.4%).12 This observation further implies that an abnormal nocturnal BP profile may be a marker for distinguishing very early-stage cognitive decline.

Several limitations of this study warrant mention. First, subjects who underwent MCI screening were not randomly selected from among all medical checkup program participants, and thus the frequency of MCI among study subjects may not completely reflect prevalence in the general community. Second, our study samples are relatively small to identify risk factors with smaller effects. However, a nocturnal BP profile was identified as a risk factor for MCI in this study setting independent of established risk factors including APOE ɛ4 genotype. Nocturnal BP profile therefore may have substantial power to identify at-risk persons. Third, we did not evaluate brain MRI images due to limited number of subjects who undertaken MRI measurement. We also did not measure neurological parameters. These data may provide further information to assess the clinical significance of nocturnal BP profile.

In conclusion, abnormal nocturnal BP profile was a sensitive marker of MCI in community-dwelling, apparently healthy elderly persons. Early detection of at-risk persons may lead to the prevention of cognitive function degeneration and the onset of dementia.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.