TABLE 2
FROM:
Diversity and evolution of the Mhc-DRB1 gene in the two endemic Iberian subspecies of Pyrenean chamois, Rupicapra pyrenaica
J Alvarez-Busto, K García-Etxebarria, J Herrero, I Garin and B M Jugo
BACK TO ARTICLETable 2. Genetic diversity measures estimated for R. p. pyrenaica and R. p. parva subspecies
| Subspecies and locations | N | n | ne | Ho | He | F | Hardy–Weinberg exact test (P)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R. p. parva | |||||||
| Somiedo | 6 | 3 | 2.00 | 0.667 | 0.500 | -0.334 | — |
| Aller | 20 | 2 | 1.98 | 0.200 | 0.495 | 0.596 | 0.009** |
| Caso | 6 | 2 | 1.80 | 0.667 | 0.444 | -0.502 | — |
| Total | 32 | 3 | 2.11 | 0.375 | 0.525 | 0.286 | 0.094 |
| R. p. pyrenaica | |||||||
| Peña Forca | 6 | 4 | 2.40 | 0.833 | 0.583 | -0.423 | — |
| Bixaurin | 15 | 3 | 2.17 | 0.667 | 0.54 | -0.235 | 0.793 |
| Anayet | 10 | 3 | 2.53 | 0.700 | 0.605 | -0.157 | 1.000 |
| Biñamala | 15 | 5 | 2.62 | 0.667 | 0.618 | -0.079 | 0.687 |
| Monte Perdido | 3 | 3 | 2.00 | 0.667 | 0.500 | -0.334 | — |
| Liena | 11 | 4 | 2.14 | 0.545 | 0.533 | -0.022 | 1.000 |
| Punta Suelsa | 8 | 3 | 2.98 | 0.875 | 0.664 | -0.317 | — |
| Posets | 15 | 5 | 2.49 | 0.467 | 0.598 | 0.219 | 0.324 |
| Maladeta | 15 | 4 | 2.18 | 0.667 | 0.542 | -0.230 | 1.000 |
| Total | 98 | 7 | 2.54 | 0.653 | 0.606 | -0.077 | 0.707 ( 0.029) |
| Total | 130 | 8 | 2.65 | 0.585 | 0.623 | 0.062 | |
Abbreviations: F, fractional reduction of heterozygosity; H e, expected heterozygosity; H o, observed heterozygosity; N, number of animals; n, number of alleles; n e, effective number of alleles.
a Only calculated in locations with N
10.
** P<0.01.
