Heredity

TABLE 3

FROM:

The Great Wall of China: a physical barrier to gene flow?

H Su, L-J Qu, K He, Z Zhang, J Wang, Z Chen and H Gu

BACK TO ARTICLE

Table 3. Analysis of molecular variation (AMOVA) for 11 subpopulations comparison

Source of variation   df Variance component % Total P-value
CcaJNAmong subpopulations14.7228.86<0.001
vs      
CcaJSWithin subpopulations3811.6571.14 
      
UpuJNAmong subpopulations12.2513.18<0.001
vs      
UpuJSWithin subpopulations4214.8586.82 
      
ParJEAmong subpopulations12.2614.31<0.001
vs      
ParJWWithin subpopulations3813.5385.69 
      
ZjuJNAmong subpopulations12.3818.91<0.001
vs      
ZjuJSWithin subpopulations3110.2181.09 
      
VneJNAmong subpopulations13.3819.04<0.001
vs      
VneJSWithin subpopulations3814.3880.96 
      
HhiJNAmong subpopulations13.5016.15<0.001
vs      
HhiJSWithin subpopulations2118.1683.85 
      
CcaCNAmong subpopulations11.0611.14<0.001
vs      
CcaCSWithin subpopulations3612.2188.86 
      
UmaCNAmong subpopulations10.877.60<0.05
vs      
UmaCSWithin subpopulations3410.5492.40 
      
ParCNAmong subpopulations10.452.87<0.001
vs      
ParCSWithin subpopulations3815.2297.13 
      
ZjuCNAmong subpopulations11.297.96<0.001
vs      
ZjuCSWithin subpopulations3710.2692.04 
      
VneCNAmong subpopulations11.467.93<0.001
vs      
VneCSWithin subpopulations4116.9092.07 

 df, degree of freedom. P-values are based on 1000 permutations of the original data set and represent the probability of a more extreme random value (Excoffier, 1993).

BACK TO ARTICLE