Original Article
Gene Therapy (2006) 13, 1619–1627. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3302827; published online 27 July 2006
Variability of naked DNA expression after direct local injection: the influence of the injection speed
F M André1,2, C Cournil-Henrionnet1,2,3, D Vernerey4, P Opolon1,2 and L M Mir1,2
- 1CNRS, UMR 8121, Laboratory of Vectorology and Gene Transfer, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
- 2Univ Paris-Sud, UMR 8121, Laboratory of Vectorology and Gene Transfer, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
- 3UMR7561 CNRS, Université de Nancy I, Vand
uvre Lès Nancy, France - 4Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
Correspondence: Dr LM Mir, Laboratory of Vectorology and Gene Transfer, UMR 8121 CNRS, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Université Paris XI, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, F-94805 Villejuif Cédex, France. E-mail: luismir@igr.fr
Received 7 March 2006; Revised 7 June 2006; Accepted 7 June 2006; Published online 27 July 2006.
Abstract
The simple injection of DNA into muscles is known to result in the expression of the injected genes, even though at low and variable levels. We report that this variability in DNA expression is partly dependent on the injection speed. The acceleration of the injection speed from values around 2
l/s up to ones around 25
l/s (depending on the tissue) results in a significant increase in gene expression in skeletal muscle (280 times on an average) and in liver (50 times) and a nonsignificant sevenfold increase in tumors. Heparin, which inhibits the spontaneous uptake of the injected DNA, also inhibits the increases related to the injection speed. However, at the highest injection speed, this inhibition is not total because very fast injections provoke a direct permeabilization of the cells. This 'hydroporation' could be similar to the permeabilization found in the hydrodynamics method based on the fast intravascular injection of a huge volume of DNA. Neither the 'hydroporation' nor the heparin-inhibitable uptake mechanism induces histologically detectable lesions. There is a limited muscle cell stress independent of the injection speed. Heterogeneity in the injection speed might thus be an explanation for the variability in DNA expression after simple injection.
Keywords:
non-viral gene therapy, muscle, liver, tumor, endocytosis, hydroporation
Abbreviations:
ANOVA, analysis of variance; GFP, green fluorescent protein; HES, hematoxylin–eosin–saffranin; Hsp70, heat-shock protein 70; MEM, minimum essential medium; MML, mechanical massage of the liver; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PI, propidium iodide; RLU, relative light units
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Oestrogen as a neuroprotective hormone
Nature Reviews Neuroscience Review (01 Jun 2002)
Gene Therapy Review
RESEARCH
High-efficiency plasmid gene transfer into dystrophic muscle
Gene Therapy Research Article
Molecular Therapy Original Article
Inhibition of gene expression in mice muscle by in vivo electrically mediated siRNA delivery
Gene Therapy Research Article
