Review



PART 1 Oral cavity, pharynx and esophagus

GI Motility online (2006) doi:10.1038/gimo12
Published 16 May 2006

Upper esophageal sphincter

Ivan M. Lang, D.V.M., Ph.D.

 About the contributor

View article related content

Top

Key Points

  • The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) closure muscles include the cervical esophagus, cricopharyngeus, and inferior pharyngeal constrictor, but primarily the cricopharyngeus.

  • The main functions of UES closure are to prevent esophageal air insufflation during negative intrathoracic pressure events, for example, inspiration, and to prevent esophagopharyngeal/laryngeal reflux during esophageal peristalsis.

  • The UES is opened intermittently by relaxation of its sphincteric muscles, contraction of its distracting muscles, and bolus pulsion.

  • The function of intermittent UES opening is to allow transphincteric flow of fluid or gas during orthograde events, for example, swallowing, or antegrade events, for example, emesis.

  • The UES opening muscles include anteriorly the superior and inferior hyoid muscles and posteriorly the superior pharyngeal muscles.

  • The UES motor and sensory functions are controlled by branches of the glossopharyngeal and vagus nerves.

  • The nucleus ambiguus is the primary motor nucleus of the UES, and the nucleus tractus solitarius is the primary termination site of UES afferents.

  • The specific actions of individual muscles of the UES depend on the particular function, that is, tone generation, swallowing, belching, retching, or vomiting.

  • The UES participates in a number of digestive tract reflexes that either act to open the sphincter or increase UES tone.

Top

Definition of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter

The upper esophageal sphincter (UES) is that area of the upper digestive tract that forms a barrier between the esophagus and the pharynx, but that intermittently opens and closes to allow passage of contents during various physiologic events. This definition implies three responses: tone generation, phasic response activity, and sphincter opening. Closing of the UES can be considered a phasic function of the UES. The upper esophageal area encompassing the tone generation function of the UES is sometimes referred to as the upper esophageal high-pressure zone (UEHPZ). Although the physiologic concepts of UES and UEHPZ are clear, the anatomic components of these concepts are not.

Upper Esophageal High-Pressure Zone

The UEHPZ is recorded using intraluminal manometric devices, and, based on combined manometric and radiographic techniques, investigators have found that the UEHPZ is associated with three muscles (Figure 1): cervical esophagus, cricopharyngeus (CP), and inferior pharyngeal constrictor (IPC) [or thyropharyngeus (TP) in animals]; therefore, all three muscles probably contribute to the UEHPZ.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 The peak pressure of the UEHPZ1, 2, 12 was found at the caudal edge of the IPC (Figure 2), but the preponderance of evidence suggests that the primary muscle of the UEHPZ is the cricopharyngeus.


Figure 2: Relationship of upper esophageal high-pressure zone (UEHPZ) to the pharyngoesophageal muscles.
Figure 2 : Relationship of upper esophageal high-pressure zone (UEHPZ) to the pharyngoesophageal muscles. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

Data compiled from three different studies of the position of the UEHPZ with respect to individual pharyngeal muscles based on combined manometric and videofluoroscopic studies. Note that the peak pressures of the UEHPZ in humans at rest with the head fixed in all three studies coincides with the lower border of the IPC. A, arytenoid; AEF, aryepiglottic fold; CC, cricoid cartilage; ESO, esophagus; IPC, inferior pharyngeal constrictor; PE, pharyngoesophageal; TR, tracheal ring; VC, vocal cord. (Source: Adapted from Goyal et al.,12 with permission of Springer Science and Business Media.)


The pressure recorded intraluminally is the sum of all external forces and is related to active and passive forces of the muscles as well as the compliance of the surrounding structures. Therefore, although peak intraluminal pressure is recorded at the IPC, it is unknown which component of the region of the IPC accounted for this peak pressure. For example, the pressure of the UEHPZ may peak in the region of the IPC because of higher passive forces of the IPC and lower compliance of the IPC muscle or pharyngeal wall, rather than a stronger contraction of the IPC muscle itself. Therefore, the point of highest intraluminal pressure need not correspond with the most active muscle.

Another problem with the conclusion that the IPC is the main muscle of the UEHPZ is that all the investigations that associated peak pressure of the UEHPZ with location of specific muscles were recorded with the subject at rest in a fixed head position.2, 3, 4, 8 It has been found that UES tone13, 14, 15, 16 and CP electromyography (EMG)1 but not TP EMG1 are very variable and change greatly with the state of arousal, excitability, and head position (see Functions of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter, below). It is possible that the very relaxed conditions and the fixed position of the head in these experiments2, 3, 4, 8 resulted in very low states of activation of the CP compared to the TP. Thus, the association of peak pressure of the UEHPZ with location of the TP may hold only at very low levels of arousal and excitability and a fixed head position.

There are many situations when the tone of the UEHPZ increases much above basal conditions, and the reason for this is addressed below (see Functions of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter). Under conditions of high UES tone, the tone increase is usually due to activation of all of the UEHPZ muscles, that is, TP, CP, and cervical esophagus, but primarily the CP.

Therefore, physiologic evidence suggests that although the IPC and cervical esophagus may contribute to the UEHPZ under certain conditions, at all levels of activity or arousal the main muscle contributing to the UEHPZ is the CP.

Upper Esophageal Sphincter

The definition of the UES includes not only tone generation, but also UES opening and phasic changes in UES tone. Phasic changes in UES tone occur during various reflexes and physiologic states (see Functions of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter, below), and in most situations these changes are due to changes in activation of the cervical esophagus, CP, or TP. The opening of the UES depends on three actions: the relaxation of the UES tone-generating muscles, the distraction of the larynx and esophagus away from each other, and bolus pulsion. The distraction forces can overcome the tone generating muscles of UES to open the sphincter2; therefore, these muscles are equally important for one of the major functions of the UES. The TP, CP, and cervical esophagus relax during UES opening, and the superior and inferior hyoid muscles as well as the posterior pharyngeal muscles provide the major distracting forces.

Regardless of reflex or function, the relative contribution of each muscle of the UES depends on the specific function (see Functions of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter, below); however, regardless of the function, the primary muscle of the UES is the CP.

Top

Anatomy and Physiology of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter

Anatomy and Cellular Physiology

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Closure Muscles

Cricopharyngeus  The CP is structurally, biochemically, and mechanically distinct from surrounding pharyngeal and esophageal muscles except for the inferior IPC (iIPC) as discussed below. The CP muscle attaches to the dorsolateral aspect of the lower part of the cricoid cartilage, forming a horizontal muscular band. In humans, two sets of muscle fibers have been identified: the horizontally oriented fibers (CPh), pars fundiformis; and an oblique band of fibers (CPo), pars obliqua, that extend from the lateral aspect of the cricoid cartilage to the posterior raphe where they blend superiorly with the IPC.17 Unlike the IPC, the pars fundiformis of the CP has no median raphe. In most animal species the CP forms a muscular band distinct from the TP, but contains a median raphe18, 19.

The CP is a striated muscle composed of variable-sized fibers about 25 to 35 mum in diameter.17, 20, 21 Unlike most other striated muscles, the muscle fibers of the CP are not oriented in a strict parallel fashion and they insert onto connective tissue rather than the skeletal framework.22 Therefore, the CP forms a muscular network. The CP contains both slow- (type I, oxidative) and fast-twitch (type II, glycolytic) muscle fibers,17, 21, 22, 23, 24 but unlike surrounding pharyngeal muscles the predominant fiber type is slow twitch.17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 The CPh (76%) has more slow-twitch fibers than the CPo (69%), and both parts of the CP are composed of two histochemically different layers.24 In both layers the slow-twitch fibers predominate, but more so in the inner (mean of 84%) than the outer (mean of 59%) layer.24 The presence of both slow- and fast-twitch fibers provides an anatomic basis for the two functions of the CP or UES: maintaining a basal tone and rapidly relaxing or contracting during various functions and reflexes.

The optimum length at which the CP reaches maximum active tension is about 1.7 times its basal (or in situ) length,26 whereas this tension in most striated muscles occurs at its resting length (Figure 3). The source of this elasticity may be attributed to the connective tissue, that is, collagen, elastin, sarcolemma, or the contractile proteins actin and myosin.27 The CP contains more elastic connective tissue and sarcolemma than most other striated muscles.22, 25 This high degree of elasticity as well as the network arrangement of muscle fibers contribute to some important and distinctive characteristics of the UES. The UES is capable of maintaining a basal tone without active muscular contraction. The active tension of the UES increases throughout the range of distention26 similar to Starling's law of the heart, allowing a greater force to be exerted by the UES behind a passing bolus. This characteristic would be important to propel larger boluses and to prevent reflux. In addition, the optimum length of the CP is larger than the maximum bolus volume likely to occur26, ensuring that the UES tension will always accommodate to the bolus. Finally the high degree of elasticity of the CP allows the UES to be opened by a bolus or distraction forces without relaxation of the CP.2

Figure 3: Strain-energy relationship of the cricopharyngeus (CP) muscle.
Figure 3 : Strain-energy relationship of the cricopharyngeus (CP) muscle. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

This graph shows that the optimum length (LO) of the CP is approximately 1.7 times its resting length (LR), whereas in other striated muscles LO = LR. This relationship illustrates the large degree of elasticity of the CP compared to other striated muscles. (Source: Medda et al.,26 with permission of the American Physiological Society.)


Inferior pharyngeal constrictor  The IPC arises from the sides of the superior portion of the cricoid cartilage and the oblique line on the side of the thyroid cartilage and the fibers spread dorsally and medially to meet the opposite side of the muscle at a fibrous raphe in the posterior median line of the pharynx.28

The IPC is a functionally diverse muscle, as it contains rostral and caudal neuromuscular compartments with different amounts of muscle fiber types.28 The rostral compartment contains more (61%) fast-twitch fibers than the caudal compartment (30%), and each compartment is composed of two layers: an inner layer of slow-muscle fibers and an outer layer of fast-muscle fibers. The slow inner layer of the caudal compartment is twice as thick as its fast outer layer, and this organization is reversed for the rostral compartment. Therefore, the IPC may have two functions: a slower acting, perhaps tone-generating function of its caudal half, and a rapid contracting function of the rostral half. The muscle fibers of the most caudal portion of the IPC, the iIPC, are most similar to those of the more rostral portions of the CP, the CPo. They have similar distributions of slow- (84%) and fast-twitch fibers and both have similar thickness of inner and outer layers (2:1 ratio).

The anatomic and histochemical data suggest that the iIPC and CP function similarly, but no physiologic data are available to confirm this conjecture. Although the iIPC and CP have similar types of muscle fibers, it is possible that the iIPC may have less elasticity than the CP. This difference could result in lower compliance of the iIPC and therefore could account for the peak UEHPZ recorded in the vicinity of the iIPC. Further studies are needed to resolve this issue.

Cervical esophagus  The cervical esophagus differs from the remainder of the esophagus in that the muscle fibers are arranged in a strictly horizontal fashion and the fibers are exclusively striated muscle fibers for first 1 to 5 cm.29 The muscle fibers are about the same size as the adjacent CP,30 and some authors have found that fibers from the CP contribute to the adjacent cranial portion of the cervical esophagus.31 The predominate muscle fiber type of the striated muscle esophagus in animals is fast twitch (type II),31, 32, 33 but this issue is disputed in human studies.29, 30, 31, 32 It has been suggested that this discrepancy is due to technical differences in tissue handling.33 Studies in animals33 but not humans30 have found regional differences in fiber type along the length of the esophagus. Although physiologic evidence suggests that the cervical esophagus may at times function as part of the UES, histochemical studies have not provided a biochemical basis for this function.

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening Muscles

The UES opening muscles are situated both anteriorly and posteriorly, where they act in concert and have similar anatomic and histochemical properties; therefore, they are discussed as groups of muscles rather than individually.

Anatomic location  The anterior muscles include the superior and inferior hyoid muscles. The superior hyoid muscles include the geniohyoideus, mylohyoideus, stylohyoideus, hyoglossus, and anterior belly of the digastricus. These muscles arise from various structures superior to the hyoid bone and insert onto the superior aspect of the hyoid bone so that their contraction acts to move the hyoid bone superiorly and anteriorly.18, 19, 34 The inferior muscles include the thyrohyoideus, sternohyoideus, sternothyroideus, and omohyoideus. The thyrohyoideus arises from the thyroid cartilage, the sternohyoideus arises from the clavicle and manubrium, the sternothyroideus arises from the manubrium and upper vertebrae, the omohyoideus arises from the scapula, and all four muscles insert onto the inferior aspect of the hyoid bone.18, 19, 34 The action of these muscles is to pull the hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage inferior and anterior.

Although most of the action of these anterior UES opening muscles is on the hyoid bone, the thyrohyoideus forms the main connection between the hyoid and larynx. Therefore, the simultaneous contraction of the anterior muscles acts to move the hyoid bone and larynx anteriorly. The relative contribution of these anterior muscles to opening of the UES depends on the function of the UES, and the stronger and wider the opening needed, the more of these muscles are recruited.

The posterior muscles include the stylopharyngeus, palatopharyngeus, pterygopharyngeus, and perhaps other superiorly directed posterior pharyngeal muscles.18, 19, 34 The actions of these muscles are to elevate the pharynx and to stabilize the posterior wall of the pharynx by providing tension posteriorly.

Histology and histochemistry  The UES opening muscles are histologically and histochemically similar to limb muscles and similar to each other.35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 The muscle fibers are oriented in parallel fashion, the fibers are uniform size, and there is little connective tissue. Most of the fibers, about 60% to 85%, are composed of fast-twitch (type II) fibers and have a diameter of 20 to 40 mum. The only opening muscle that differs to a significant degree is the thyrohyoid, which has more type I (40%) and highly oxidative muscle fibers41 than the other UES opening muscles. The increased fatigue resistance that results from these types of muscle fibers may contribute to the tonic functions of the thyrohyoid. The thyrohyoid maintains a constant distance between the thyroid and hyoid cartilages during many activities, and tonically contracts to provide the main link between the suprahyoid muscles and the larynx.

Neurophysiology of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter Muscles

Motor Innervation

Cricopharyngeus  The CP receives innervation from the pharyngeal plexus, which is supplied by three major nerves: vagus nerve branches including the pharyngeal branch of the vagus nerve [also referred to as the pharyngoesophageal nerve (PEN), superior laryngeal nerve (SLN), and recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN)]; the glossopharyngeal nerve (GPN); and sympathetic nerve fibers from the superior cervical ganglion. Although many nerves appear to project to the CP, the PEN provides the major motor innervation of the CP.23, 26, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51 Glycogen depletion studies in rats found that the primary motor nerve of the CP is the PEN, and the RLN provides no motor innervation.42 Although SLN stimulation depleted glycogen from the CP,42 electrical stimulation of the PEN resulted in a much greater (about five to six times greater) CP electrical response than stimulation of the SLN26 or GPN,49 and RLN stimulation had no effect on electrical43 or contractile activity46, 47 of the CP. Furthermore, transection of the PEN rather than the GPN50 or SLN46, 47 had profound long-term deficits on swallowing and resting pharyngeal pressure and produced denervation potentials in the CP, and transection of the RLN unilaterally had no effect on resting UES pressure in chronically instrumented dogs.51 In addition, transection of the PEN, but not SLN and RLN bilaterally, blocked the CP EMG responses during swallowing (Figure 4). Moreover, laryngeal paralysis in humans due to RLN paralysis is not associated with UES contractile dysfunction during swallowing.52 Although there is no prominent raphe of the CP, the CP is bilaterally innervated45 with each half of the CP acting as a distinct motor unit.26 The motor end plates of the CP form distinctive bands in each half of the CPh; but both CPo and CPh have end plates scattered throughout the muscle.23 The sympathetic nerves probably innervate the blood vessels and epithelial mucus glands, but they have no role in motor control of the CP.53

Figure 4: Effect of transection of various motor nerves on the motor responses of the UES closing muscles during swallowing.
Figure 4 : Effect of transection of various motor nerves on the motor responses of the UES closing muscles during swallowing. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

Each panel of this figure depicts the electromyography (EMG) responses of the muscles of the UES during swallowing activated by injection of 1 mL of water into the pharynx of a decerebrate cat. The headings of each panel indicate the nerves that were transected before the stimulus. Note that transection of the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) and recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) bilaterally had no significant effect on the EMG responses of all muscles, but that the additional transection of the pharyngoesophageal nerve (PEN) bilaterally blocked responses of the cricopharyngeus (CP) and esophagus (ESO) 1 cm below CP, but had no significant effect on the thyrohyoideus (TH) or thyropharyngeus (TP).


Some have suggested that the RLN innervates the CP based on studies of the visual tracing of nerve fibers23 or the effects of electrical stimulation of the RLN on electrical responses recorded from the CP.53, 54, 55 The RLN connects with the pharyngeal plexus at the level of CP, and its fibers are continuous with the fibers of this plexus; therefore, it is not possible to know the source of fibers that branch from the RLN nerve and project to the CP based solely on visual inspection of fiber distribution. The electrical stimulation of the RLN causes electrical responses recorded from electrodes on the CP,53, 55 but these responses could have been due to spread of current from the underlying laryngeal muscles. Evidence for the possibility of spread of current from laryngeal muscles was found in these studies,55 as transection of all of the nerves innervating the CP did not eliminate the electrical responses from the CP due to electrical stimulation of the RLN, and RLN stimulation caused electrical responses on the IPC as well, even though prior evidence found no innervation of the IPC by the RLN.23, 28 Spread of current can also explain the results of the other electrical studies,53, 55 as the current needed to cause CP electrical responses to RLN stimulation was much greater than that for PEN stimulation, and the magnitude of the electrical responses recorded from the CP during RLN stimulation were much smaller than those activated by PEN stimulation55 or much smaller55 than that found in other studies when the response originated from the CP itself.26 In none of these electrical recording studies53, 54, 55 of the CP were experiments done to control for the possibility of spread of current from the laryngeal muscles. However, the spread of current has been observed in similar studies. The electrical stimulation of both the PEN and RLN caused electrical responses on the CP, but the electrical response to PEN stimulation was far greater (more than 10-fold) and only PEN stimulation caused contraction of the CP (Figure 5). One source of this current spread may be the posterior cricoarytenoideus, as the posterior cricoarytenoideus lies just below the anterior border of the CP (Figure 1) and the RLN innervates the posterior cricoarytenoideus. The primary location of CP electrical response to RLN stimulation was at the anterior portion of the CP,53 which is the closest part of the CP to the underlying posterior cricoarytenoideus. Therefore, the evidence supporting a role for the RLN in the motor innervation of the CP is lacking.

Figure 5: Effect of electrical nerve stimulation on electrical response and tension of UES closing muscles.
Figure 5 : Effect of electrical nerve stimulation on electrical response and tension of UES closing muscles. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

The effects of electrical nerve stimulation on electrical responses are indicated in the left panels and on tension in the right panels, whereas the effects of stimulation of the PEN are indicated in the top panels and of RLN stimulation in the bottom panels. Note that PEN stimulation had a large effect on both electrical response and tension of the CP, whereas RLN stimulation had a small effect on CP electrical response but no effect on CP tension. Therefore, electrical stimulation of the RLN can produce an electrical response on the CP that has no effect on muscle tension and is probably due to spread of electrical current from the RLN or laryngeal muscles underlying the CP.


Inferior pharyngeal constrictor  The motor innervation of the IPC is supplied primarily by the pharyngeal branch of the vagus nerve through the pharyngeal plexus23, 28 ; however, no physiologic studies have been reported that have investigated this issue directly. Many studies have attempted to trace nerve fibers through the pharyngeal plexus to the IPC, but because this innervation is through a plexus of interconnecting nerves, it is not possible to definitively determine which branch supplies the IPC using these techniques. The iIPC is supplied by the same branch of the pharyngeal branch of the vagus nerve that supplies the CP.28 This implies similar control mechanisms, but no physiologic studies have been reported to confirm this conjecture. The entire IPC muscle has a single vertical band of motor end plates that corresponds to the location of the pharyngeal plexus.23

Cervical esophagus  The cervical esophagus is innervated by the RLN.23, 45, 47 The terminal branches travel around the esophagus in a circular fashion and appear to cross the midline both anteriorly and posteriorly.23

Opening muscles  The motor innervation of the UES opening muscles is listed in Table 1.56


Sensory innervation  Sensory innervation of the UES involves both epithelial and muscular receptive pathways. The pharyngeal epithelium is innervated by branches of the GPN, SLN, and vagus nerves,57, 58, 59, 60, 61 the laryngeal epithelium by the internal branch of the SLN,60 and the esophageal epithelium by the vagus nerves and the SLN61 or RLN,55 depending on species. The SLN mediates various reflexes from the pharynx and esophagus including swallowing, the RLN mediates the afferent limb of esophago-UES contractile reflex (described below) from the cervical esophagus,47 and the GPN62 mediates the afferent limb of the pharyngo-UES contractile reflex (described below). The loss of sensory function from the UES may explain some of the swallowing deficits observed after transection of the GPN in dogs.49, 50 The CP is devoid of muscle spindles,22, 23 but a Golgi tendon organ-like structure has been found in the human CP that may be involved in providing muscle tension feedback to the pharyngeal motor neurons.63

Most of the UES opening muscles have muscle spindles and the afferent nerves transmitting this proprioceptive information to the central nervous system are the same nerves as the motor nerves.64, 65, 66, 67 The muscles that do not have muscle spindles and this sensory innervation include the digastric muscle,68 stylohyoideus,37 and stylopharyngeus.69, 70

Neurochemical control: Upper esophageal sphincter muscles  The only neurotransmitter of any of the UES opening or closing muscles found to mediate contraction is acetylcholine acting through nicotinic cholinergic receptors. However, the following neuropeptides have been found in the CP: neuropeptide Y, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), tyrosine hydroxylase, substance P, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, and galanin.71 Calcitonin gene-related peptide has also been found in the TP as well as the striated muscle esophagus, but there is less CGRP in the CP than TP.72, 73 The functional significance of these neuropeptides in the UES muscles is unknown, but they may simply represent the autonomic innervation of the muscle because substance P, VIP, and galanin are found in parasympathetic nerves and CGRP, neuropeptide Y, and tyrosine hydroxylase are found in sympathetic nerves. In general the sympathetic neuropeptides were more abundant than the parasympathetic neuropeptides. Clusters of neurons, that is, ganglia, have been found in the CP rather than TP, and these are mostly parasympathetic ganglia.71 The roles of either the sympathetic or parasympathetic innervation and peptides are unknown, but control of blood vessels, glands, and mucosa are the most likely functions.

Motor neurons: Upper esophageal sphincter closing muscles  Most of the motoneurons of the muscles of the UES, that is, the CP, IPC, and cervical esophagus, are located in the nucleus ambiguus, and the nucleus ambiguus is topographically organized such that its more rostral portions contain the motoneurons to the more caudally located muscles,74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83 although there is considerable overlap. A few motoneurons of the UES muscles are located in various brainstem nuclei outside of the nucleus ambiguus.74, 79, 80 The innervation of the IPC and the CP in those species in which the CP has a median raphe is mostly unilateral.74, 76, 80 The ipsilateral innervation of the pharynx by the nucleus ambiguus is consistent with swallowing studies that found that half of the brainstem controls the ipsilateral half of the pharynx during swallowing.84 In contrast, the reflex activation of the CP requires both halves of the brainstem (I.M. Lang, unpublished observations) and electrical stimulation of the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), the primary afferent nucleus of the vagus nerve, caused activation of the CP bilaterally. These results suggest that control of the UES differs with different functions. The neurons of the nucleus ambiguus have extensive dendritic arborization to the adjacent reticular formation,85 and ultrastructural studies indicate the synapses on these neurons are both excitatory and inhibitory.86 These findings provide an anatomic basis for the numerous excitatory and inhibitory responses of the UES and CP. Many pharyngeal motor neurons exhibit respiratory rhythm but none of them had a spontaneous background discharge, suggesting that the pharyngeal motor neurons are not the source of UES tone.87

Motor neurons: Upper esophageal sphincter opening muscles  The motor nuclei of the UES opening muscles are listed in Table 1.

Sensory and premotor neurons: Upper esophageal sphincter closing muscles  Pharyngeal vagal afferents have their cell bodies in the nodose ganglion74, 78 and terminate on premotor neurons found in the interstitial and intermediate subnuclei of the NTS.88, 89, 90, 91 However stimulation of the pharynx using a physiologic stimulus,92 that is, water injection, activated neurons in the interstitial, intermediate, as well as the ventromedial subnucleus of the NTS. The specific premotor neurons participating in each reflex response initiated by stimulation of the pharynx is unknown.

Esophageal afferents have their cell bodies in the nodose ganglion93, 94, 95 and cervical and thoracic dorsal root ganglia of the spinal cord,93, 94, 96, 97 and the nodose fibers93 terminate in premotor neurons88, 91, 98 in the central subnucleus of the NTS. No studies have been conducted to specifically examine the most rostral portion of the cervical esophagus that forms part of the UES. It is possible that this area of the esophagus has similar distribution of premotor neurons as the pharynx. However, stimulation of the esophagus using a physiologic stimulus92, that is, air injection, activated neurons in not only the central but also the ventral, dorsolateral, and ventrolateral subnuclei of the NTS. It is likely that the additional NTS subnuclei identified in this study are third- and higher order neurons. The function of each NTS subnucleus is unknown. It is possible that muscular and mucosal afferents terminate in different premotor subnuclei because although esophageal distention primarily activates neurons in the central subnucleus of the NTS, esophageal acidification primarily activates neurons in the interstitial subnucleus of the NTS (I.M. Lang, unpublished observations).

The stimulation of the pharynx or esophagus excites numerous reflexes, but the specific premotor neurons associated with each specific reflex response is unknown.

Sensory and premotor neurons: Upper esophageal sphincter opening muscles   All of the sensory information from the UES opening muscles is from proprioceptors, and it projects to the associated central nervous system sensory nuclei listed in Table 1.

Top

Functions of the Upper Esophageal Sphincter

Tone Generation

Tone refers to the constant generation of force within a sphincter. It is produced by both passive mechanical properties of the sphincter as well as active muscle contraction, and it is recorded intraluminally by manometric devices or externally by recording EMG from the muscles themselves. Manometric techniques, however, are subject to two problems: (1) they cannot distinguish between passive and active tension, and (2) they create passive tension themselves by distending the highly elastic CP muscle. The main limitation of EMG activity is that it can provide an index of active but not passive tension. Another important consideration is that the UES is composed of striated muscles that, unlike smooth muscles, have no intrinsic tone-generating mechanisms. All tone of the UES must arise from activation of the motor neurons.

Manometric studies have found a wide range, 35 to 200 mmHg, of resting UES pressure,99, 100 and this pressure falls to very low levels during sleep14 or anesthesia.16 In addition, pharyngeal motoneurons of decerebrate and paralyzed cats do not exhibit a spontaneous discharge.87 Therefore, evidence suggests that the UES has no active basal tone, although a residual intraluminal pressure may be recorded manometrically due to the passive elastic properties of the CP.

Although there is no basal tone of the UES, the tone of the UES is highly variable and can increase to very high levels. High UES pressures have been recorded during acute stress15, 101 (Figure 6) and other emotional states,1 and sharp increases in UES pressure have been recorded during waking.14 In addition, large increases in ongoing EMG activity of the CP in animals1 have been recorded during changes in posture, in certain head and body positions, and in response to stress or excitation (Figure 7). Therefore, although the UES has no active basal tone, there are many mechanisms for increasing tone above basal levels, and many of them involve reflexes, as discussed below.

Figure 6: Effect of stress on UES pressure.
Figure 6 : Effect of stress on UES pressure. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

This figure depicts the tracings of UES pressure, skin conductance, integrated frontalis EMG, and heart rate before and during a stressful listening task (at arrow). Note the anticipatory rise in UES pressure about 15 s before the stress begins. (Source: Cook et al.,15 with permission of the American Gastroenterological Association.)


Figure 7: Relationship of CP and TP EMG activities to UES pressure during rest and excitation.
Figure 7 : Relationship of CP and TP|[emsp]|EMG activities to UES pressure during rest and excitation. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

a: Actual responses. b: Graph of the relationship between EMG and UES pressure. The UES pressure changed five times: one swallow (S) preceded and followed by two rises in UES pressure induced by whistling in an awake dog lying on its side. Note that UES pressure changes correlated well (p<.05) with integrated CP-EMG but not integrated TP-EMG. TP, thyropharyngeus: CP, cricopharyngeus. (Source: Lang et al.,1 with permission of the American Physiological Society.)


The specific muscles involved in active UES tone generation have been investigated by recording EMG from the TP, CP, and proximal esophagus in conscious, nonsedated, and nonrestrained animals. Under these conditions it was observed1 that the TP EMG changed little regardless of excitability, arousal, and head position, whereas the CP EMG changed greatly (Figure 7). In addition, correlation of basal TP EMG and CP EMG with UES pressure during changes in excitability1 revealed that CP but not TP EMG was significantly related to UES pressure (Figure 7). Yet, even in these studies it was found that peak pressure of the UEHPZ was observed radiographically at the distal end of the TP or proximal end of the CP.1 However, as with similar human studies these measurements were made with the animal relaxed and its head supported. Only under these conditions is TP tone more active than CP tone (Figure 8). Therefore, although the UEHPZ may occur in or close to the TP based on published studies, this finding only applies to the unusual conditions of the recording session and probably does not reflect the situation in a freely active individual. The UEHPZ may be higher in the vicinity of the TP under very low states of CP activation due to differences in passive mechanical factors of the muscles as the CP is much more compliant than the TP due to its high content of elastic tissue.

Figure 8: High variability of CP but not TP EMG.
Figure 8 : High variability of CP but not TP|[emsp]|EMG. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

This figure depicts the EMG responses of the TP, CP, and diaphragm in a minimally restrained awake chronically instrumented dog. Throughout this recording the dog is lying prone with its head upright or resting down on its paws. Note that the CP but not TP EMG varies with head position, and when the dog is relaxed at rest with its head down the TP EMG exceeds the CP EMG. TP, thyropharyngeus; CP, cricopharyngeus; Dia-D, diaphragmatic dome fibers.


The above studies recorded TP EMG 1 to 2 cm above the CP in dogs, but recent evidence has suggested that the iIPC of humans has the similar histochemical properties and innervation pattern as the CP,28 and therefore may also participate in the UEHPZ and tone generation. However, no physiologic studies have been reported to date to confirm this conjecture.

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening and Closing

The UES opens during various physiologic states, for example, swallowing, vomiting, and belching, to allow the passage of luminal contents, but the specific manner of the opening and the specific muscles involved differ with the physiologic state. In all states UES opening begins with UES relaxation followed briefly by contraction of UES distracting muscles, but the specific responses differ as discussed below.

Swallowing

Opening of the UES during swallowing is a very complex maneuver. Simultaneous recordings of UES pressure and opening with EMG recording of UES muscles in chronically instrumented dogs found the following sequence of events during swallowing.1 First, the CP muscle relaxed; about 100 milliseconds (ms) later the UES pressure began to fall, that is, UES relaxation, and this was followed about 100 ms (150 ms in humans3) later by UES opening (Figures 9 and 10). Videofluoroscopic studies found that UES opening was associated with superior and anterior movement of the hyoid and larynx (Figure 10).1, 3 The onset of the superior movement of the hyoid and larynx coincided with the beginning of UES relaxation and preceded anterior movement of the larynx and hyoid by about 100 ms in dogs1 and over 200 ms in humans3 (Figure 10). The anterior movement just preceded (humans,3Figure 10) or was concomitant (dogs1) with UES opening. Therefore, the UES is first moved superiorly perhaps in order to position the UES to take maximum advantage of the subsequent contraction of the UES opening muscles. This sequential movement of hyoid superiorly and anteriorly probably accounts for the elliptical pattern of movement of the hyoid bone (Figure 11) observed during swallowing.106

Figure 9: Temporal relationship of UES pressure, opening and CP EMG during 4-mL barium swallow relative to hyoid movement.
Figure 9 : Temporal relationship of UES pressure, opening and CP|[emsp]|EMG during 4-mL barium swallow relative to hyoid movement. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

The start and end of hyoid movement are indicated by vertical lines where the shaded areas indicate standard error (SE). Horizontal bars depict mean + SE onset and offset of measured variables relative to start of hyoid movement. Green bars depict data from noninstrumented dogs (n = 8), and blue bars depict data from instrumented dogs (n = 6). Note the electrode implantation significantly delayed time of UES closure. There is approximately a 100-ms difference between CP relaxation, UES relaxation, and UES opening. (Source: Lang et al.,1 with permission of the American Physiological Society.)


Figure 10: Temporal relationship among UES pressure, trans-UES flow, and movement of the hyoid and larynx during 5-mL barium swallow.
Figure 10 : Temporal relationship among UES pressure, trans-UES flow, and movement of the hyoid and larynx during 5-mL barium swallow. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

The data are pooled from eight subjects. The brown bar indicates the period of UES opening when trans-UES flow of barium occurred. Note that the superior movement of the larynx and hyoid precede the drop in UES pressure and the anterior movement of the larynx and hyoid precede UES opening. (Source: Cook et al.,3 with permission of the American Physiological Society.)


Figure 11: Movement of the hyoid bone during belching (a) and swallowing (b).
Figure 11 : Movement of the hyoid bone during belching (a) and swallowing (b). Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

Open circles indicate UES opening observed by videofluoroscopy. Although hyoid bone movement during swallowing was invariably upward, forward, and counterclockwise, its movement during belching was mainly anterior and clockwise. The magnitude of hyoid bone movement during belching was significantly less than its movement during swallowing. Hyoid bone movement is an indication of the magnitude of the distraction forces that open the UES (p <.02). (Source: Shaker et al.,106 with permission of the American Physiological Society.)


The CP is the primary muscle that relaxes to permit UES opening while the TP muscle contracts during this time1, 102, 103 (Figure 12). During swallowing the CP relaxes for about 0.5 s in humans3 and about 0.3 s in dogs.1, 102, 103 Superior movement of the larynx and hyoid is probably caused by contraction of the superior hyoid muscles, as all of these muscles begin to be activated concomitant with CP relaxation, and this activation continues throughout CP relaxation.1, 103 It is also important to note that the inferior hyoid muscles completely relax during this time (Figure 13), allowing maximum superior movement of the hyoid, larynx and UES.1, 103 Anterior movement of the hyoid and larynx corresponds with maximal activation of the geniohyoideus, which suggests that the geniohyoideus is one of the primary suprahyoid muscles responsible for UES opening.1, 103 The stylopharyngeus is activated concomitant with the geniohyoideus; therefore, it is likely that maximum opening of the UES is due to activation not only of the geniohyoideus but also of the stylopharyngeus and other posterior pharyngeal muscles that act to stabilize the posterior wall of the pharynx.103

Figure 12: Response of UES muscles during swallowing.
Figure 12 : Response of UES muscles during swallowing. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

This figure illustrates the EMG responses of the three UES closure muscles, and many of the superior hyoid UES opening muscles during a dry swallow ad lib feeding of canned food in a chronically instrumented dog. Note that the three UES closing muscles respond quite differently during swallowing but the superior opening muscles are activate almost simultaneously. MH, mylohyoideus; GH, geniohyoideus; TH, thyrohyoideus; TP, thyropharyngeus; CP, cricopharyngeus; ESO, esophagus 2 cm below CP.


Figure 13: Responses of superior and inferior hyoid muscles during swallowing.
Figure 13 : Responses of superior and inferior hyoid muscles during swallowing. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

This figure illustrates the EMG responses of the superior (MH, GH) and inferior (TH, SH, StH) hyoid muscles during swallowing in a chronically instrumented dog. These muscles are capable of putting anterior traction on the larynx, thereby opening the UES. Note that during swallowing only the superior hyoid muscles are activated. S, swallowing: L, licking; MH, mylohyoideus; GH, geniohyoideus; TH, thyrohyoideus; SH, sternohyoideus; StH, sternothyroideus.


Belching

Belching is characterized by a prolonged, over 1 s, drop in UES pressure,105, 106 opening of the UES105, 106 (Figure 14), and relaxation of the UES muscles91 (Figures 15 and 16). Unlike during swallowing, both the TP and CP relax during belching (Figure 16), and the UES pressure drop during belching coincides with rather than precedes UES muscle relaxation (I.M. Lang, unpublished observations). In addition, during belching most of the distracting muscles are not active and the one active distracting muscle, the thyrohyoideus, is activated at a low but constant level107 (Figure 15). These small changes in UES distracting muscles probably account for the rather short anterior movement and lack of superior movement of the hyoid bone observed during belching105 (Figure 11). The role of infrahyoid and posterior pharyngeal muscles during belching remain to be studied, but given the small response of the anterior distracting muscles (and small anterior movement of the hyoid105), it is suggested that UES opening during belching may be related more to the distracting effects of the bolus than occurs during other functions such as swallowing. This effect may account for the observation that the delay from UES pressure drop to UES opening is longer during belching (about 0.4 s106) than swallowing (about 0.2 s3).

Figure 14: Temporal relationship among function of the glottis, UES, hyoid bone, and esophageal and stomach pressures during belching induced by rapid injection of 40 mL of air into the esophagus.
Figure 14 : Temporal relationship among function of the glottis, UES, hyoid bone, and esophageal and stomach pressures during belching induced by rapid injection of 40 mL of air into the esophagus. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

This figure is based on data obtained from concurrent recordings of videoendoscopic, videofluoroscopic, manometric, and electromyographic data. Belch begins with vocal cord adduction and ends with return to resting position. All other events, including UES opening and closure, occur while cords are fully adducted and thereby introitus to trachea is closed. VC-Ad-O, onset of vocal cord adduction; VC-Ab-Max, maximum onset of vocal cord adduction; VC-Ab-O, onset of vocal cord abduction; VC-Ab-Max, return of vocal cords to resting position; EPI-O, onset of increase in intraesophageal pressure; AEA-O, onset of approximation of arytenoids toward base of epiglottis; GPI-O, onset of increase in intragastric pressure; EMG-O, onset of EMG response from geniohyoid/mylohyoid muscle group; UESR-O, onset of UES relaxation. (Source: Shaker et al.,106 with permission of the American Physiological Society.)


Figure 15: Electromyography (EMG) responses of the opening and closing muscles of the UES during belching and swallowing activated by injection of 100 mL of air into the stomach of a chronically instrumented dog.
Figure 15 : Electromyography (EMG) responses of the opening and closing muscles of the UES during belching and swallowing activated by injection of 100 mL of air into the stomach of a chronically instrumented dog. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

Note that the only anteriorly directed UES opening muscle activated during belching is the TH and the main UES opening muscle activated is the posteriorly directed StP. These muscle responses are consistent with the movement of the hyoid during belching (90). StP, stylopharyngeus, GH, geniohyoideus; TH, thyrohyoideus; CP, cricopharyngeus; ESO, esophagus 1 cm below the CP; SH, sternohyoideus.


Figure 16: Effects of belching on the UES closure muscles.
Figure 16 : Effects of belching on the UES closure muscles. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

Belching was activated by the injection of air (50 mL) into the stomach of a chronically instrumented dog. Note that belching is associated with inhibition of both the TP and CP during the belch. TP, thyropharyngeus, CP, cricopharyngeus; ESO, esophagus 1 cm below CP; L, longitudinally oriented electrodes; C, circularly oriented electrodes.


Retching and Vomiting

The UES is involved in numerous functions during retching and vomiting, and all three UES muscles participate in one or more of these responses (Figure 17).

Figure 17: Role of UES closure and opening muscles during the three phases of vomiting.
Figure 17 : Role of UES closure and opening muscles during the three phases of vomiting. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

Schematic illustration of typical pattern of activation of most pharyngeal, hyoid, and laryngeal muscles during vomiting derived from EMG data of chronically instrumented dogs stimulated to vomit by apomorphine. Note that during the pre-retch phase the tone of the CP and esophagus increase, significantly closing the UES. During retching the muscles pulling the UES open in a superior direction (superior hyoid muscles, HP and SP) are all activated in concert 180 degrees out of phase with the UES opening muscles that open the UES in an inferior direction (inferior hyoid muscles). However, the UES does not open during superior movement because all of the UES closure muscles are activated as well. During vomiting, the superior and inferior hyoid and pharyngeal UES opening muscles are activated concomitantly with relaxation of all of the UES closure muscles, thereby causing maximum opening of the UES. MH, mylohyoideus; GH, geniohyoideus; TH, thyrohyoideus; HG, hyoglossus; HP, hyopharyngeus; SP, stylopharyngeus; TP, thyropharyngeus; CP, cricopharyngeus; E#, esophagus number of centimeters from UES; SH, stenohyoideus; ST, sternothyroideus; CT, cricothyroideus; TA, thyroarytenoideus; CD, cricoarytenoideus dorsalis; DH, diaphragm hiatus. (Source: Lang et al.,103 with permission of the American Physiological Society.)


Pre-retch tone increase   Just prior to retching the tone of the UES increases greatly in phase with the diaphragm, and this increase in tone involves the CP and cervical esophagus, but not the TP.103 The function of this increase in tone is to prevent air insufflation of the esophagus during the large negative thoracic pressure that is subsequently generated during the first very large inspiration of the first retch. This closing of the UES allows the lungs to fully inflate without allowing air into the esophagus or stomach. The LES is relaxed at this time, so without UES closure the stomach would fill with air.

Phasic changes in UES tone during retching   After the first very large retch to fill the lungs, the diaphragm and glottis then shift phase so that the diaphragm contracts during glottal closure instead of glottal opening.103 This phase shift allows the diaphragm to be used as a pump to expel gastric contents, and the external intercostal muscles then become the sole generator of inspiration. Thus, at the end of the inspiratory phase of the first retch, the glottis closes as the UES opens, shifting the force of the diaphragmatic contraction to the stomach. The diaphragm then relaxes, the glottis opens, and the UES closes very strongly.103 The function of this closure of the UES during this phase of retching is to prevent aspiration, as this occurs during inspiration and gastric contents may be in the upper esophagus at this time.104 Prior studies have found that gastric contents can be expelled to just below the UES during retching104. This cycle continues until the end of retching. The UES during this phase of retching involves all three UES muscles, that is, cervical esophagus, CP, and TP.

Vomitus expulsion   During vomitus expulsion all of the UES muscles relax and the UES is pulled open by contraction of not only the suprahyoid muscles but also the infrahyoid muscles as well as the posterior pharyngeal muscles.103 Therefore, maximum superior traction occurs as well as maximum anterior to posterior opening tension. The primary UES opening muscles during vomitus expulsion are the mylohyoideus, geniohyoideus, sternohyoideus, and stylopharyngeus.103 Although the trajectory of the hyoid bone has not been determined during vomitus expulsion, based on the muscle activation sequence (stylopharyngeus and hyopharyngeus, then mylohyoideus and geniohyoideus, then sternohyoideus) the hyoid bone probably forms an elliptical path moving in the following sequence: posteriorly, superiorly, anteriorly, inferiorly, and back to rest position. This movement pattern would be very different from that during swallowing or belching.

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Reflexes

Pharyngo-UES Contractile Reflex

Stimulation of the pharynx with light touch increases tone in the UES,108 and this response is due to activation of the TP and CP but primarily the CP.62 In some experiments the TP was found to be involved in the response but other times it was not. It is unknown whether the cervical esophagus is involved in this reflex response. The most sensitive area of the pharynx was the hypopharynx and nasopharynx.62 The afferent limb of this reflex is the glossopharyngeal nerve, and the efferent limb is the pharyngeal branch of the vagus nerve.62 This reflex may function to prevent air insufflation of the esophagus during strong inspiration as this reflex can be activated by air puffs and is strongest closest to the nasopharynx.108

Esophago-UES Contractile Reflex

The slow distention of the esophagus causes an increase in tone of the UES or CP,111, 112, 113 and this reflex involves all three UES muscles—CP, TP, and cervical esophagus—but primarily the CP (Figure 18). This reflex can be activated at all levels of the esophagus, but is most sensitive near the UES, and the receptors for this reflex are probably slowly adapting muscular mechanoreceptors.112 This reflex is stimulated not only by distention but also by contraction of the esophageal wall, and it is strongly activated by the propagating esophageal peristalsis.112 The role of intraluminal acid in activating this reflex is equivocal, as results have been contradictory.114, 115, 116, 117 The afferent limb of this reflex is the vagus nerve,109, 110, 112 and the efferent limb is the pharyngeal branch of the vagus nerve (I.M. Lang, unpublished observation). This reflex probably functions to prevent reflux of a bolus during its aborad propagation in esophageal peristalsis.

Figure 18: Effect of esophago-UES contractile reflex on the UES closure muscles.
Figure 18 : Effect of esophago-UES contractile reflex on the UES closure muscles. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

Distention of the esophagus of a chronically instrumented awake dog with a balloon caused an increase in EMG activity of the TP, CP, and cervical esophagus, but primarily the CP. The response magnitude was related to the magnitude of the stimulus, and the response was greater closer to the UES. TP, thyropharyngeus; CP, cricopharyngeus; ESO, esophagus 1 cm below CP; ball-press, balloon pressure; LES, lower esophageal sphincter.


Esophago-UES Relaxation Reflex

The rapid distention of the esophagus causes relaxation of the UES118, 119 (Figure 19) that involves the relaxation of the CP.112 It is unknown whether the TP or cervical esophagus are involved in this reflex, but it is likely that they are. This reflex is probably part of the belch response, as it is activated by the same stimuli, and the pharyngeal and laryngeal motor responses that accompany this reflex are identical to those activated during belching as discussed previously.112 The receptors for this reflex are probably rapidly adapting mucosal mechanoreceptors, and the afferent limb of this reflex is the vagus nerve.112

Figure 19: Role of UES closure muscles in esophago-UES relaxation reflex.
Figure 19 : Role of UES closure muscles in esophago-UES relaxation reflex. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

Rapid injection of air into the esophagus of a decerebrate cat caused the CP to relax concomitant with activation of UES opening muscles, i.e., GH and TH. ESO#, esophagus number of centimeters from LES; GH, geniohyoideus; TH, thyrohyoideus; CP, cricopharyngeus; IA, intraarytenoideus; CT, cricothyroideus. (Source: Lang et al.,112 with permission of the American Physiological Society.)


Lung-UES Contractile Reflex

The distention of the lungs above tidal volume or the rapid deflation of the lungs causes an increase in tone of the UES that is probably mediated by contraction of the TP and CP but primarily the CP (I.M. Lang, unpublished observations). The receptors for this reflex are probably rapidly adapting lung inflation receptors, and the afferent limb of this reflex is the vagus nerve (I.M. Lang, unpublished observations). This reflex may be partly responsible for the respiratory rhythm (Figure 20) that is often found on the UES1, 16 and this reflex may function to prevent esophageal insufflation during deep inspirations.

Figure 20: Respiratory rhythm of the UES closure muscles.
Figure 20 : Respiratory rhythm of the UES closure muscles. Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

UES pressure and CP EMG recorded simultaneously in an awake chronically instrumented dog. Note that at each inspiration the UES pressure increased concomitant with an increase in integrated CP EMG. CP, cricopharyngeus; S, swallow; in., inspiration.


Vestibulo-UES Contractile Reflex

The UES tone changes greatly with change in head position, and this tone change is due to activation of both the TP and CP but primarily the CP1, 16 (Figure 8). It is likely that this reflex is due to activation of the vestibular apparatus and may function to prevent pharyngeal reflux of esophageal contents when gravity is against the direction of peristalsis.

Top

Conclusion

The UES is not just one muscle but is composed of sets of opening and closing muscles; however, the primary muscle that governs all functions of the UES is the CP. The CP is not only unique in its actions, but also in its anatomy and physiology. Numerous nerves control the function of the UES, but the primary motor nerve of the CP is the pharyngeal branch of the vagus nerve. Tone is generated in the UES by various reflexes rather than specific tone-generating neurocircuitry. The primary functions of the UES are to prevent esophageal air insufflation during negative intrathoracic pressure and to prevent esophagopharyngeal/laryngeal reflux during esophageal peristalsis. The degree to which the UES is actively opened by distracting muscles is related to the volume of the bolus such that belching is associated with minimal and vomiting with maximal distracting forces.

In the past most research investigations have concentrated on the role of the cricopharyngeus in UES function, but in future studies the role of other sphincteric and distracting muscles involved with UES function will be investigated. In addition, future studies will investigate the possibility that individual UES muscles may have multiple functions. Better methods for recording EMG or force, possibly using magnetic resonance imaging techniques, from UES muscles in humans would greatly increase our knowledge of the role of the individual UES muscles in various functions.

Article related content

Top

References

  1. Lang IM, Dantas RO, Cook IJ, Dodds WJ. Videoradiographic, manometric and electromyographic assessment of upper esophageal sphincter. Am J Physiol 1991;260:G911–G919. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  2. Asoh R, Goyal RK. Manometry and electromyography of the upper esophageal sphincter in the opossum. Gastroenterology 1978;74:514–520. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  3. Cook IJ, Dodds WJ, Dantas RO, et al. Opening mechanisms of the upper esophageal sphincter. Am J Physiol 1989;257:G748–G759. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  4. Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Dent J, Logemann, JA, Shaker, R. Upper esophageal sphincter function during deglutition. Gastroenterology 1988;95:52–62. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  5. Nilsson ME, Isberg A, Schiratzki H. The location of the upper oesophageal sphincter and its behavior during bolus propagation: a simultaneous cineradiography and manometric investigation. Clin Otolaryngol 1989;14:61–65. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  6. Ekberg O. Elevation of the pharynx and width of the pharyngo-esophageal segment during swallow. Acta Radiol Diag 1986;27:293–295. | ChemPort |
  7. Isberg A, Nilsson ME, Sciratzi H. The upper esophageal sphincter during normal deglutition. A simultaneous cineradiographic and manometric investigation. Acta Radiol Diag 1985;26:563–568. | ChemPort |
  8. Sokol EM, Heitman P, Wolf BS, Cohen BR. Simultaneous cineradiographic and manometric study of the larynx, hypopharynx, and cervical esophagus. Gastroenterology 1966;51:960–974. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  9. Van Overbeek JJM, Wit HP, Paping RHL, Segenhout HM. Simultaneous manometry and electromyography in the pharyngoesophageal segment. Laryngoscope 1985;95:582–584. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  10. Elidan J, Gonen B, Shochina M, Gay I. Electromyography of the inferior constrictor and cricopharyngeal muscles during swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99:46–49. | PubMed |
  11. Shipp T, Deatsch WW, Robertson K. Pharyngeal muscle activity during swallowing in man. Laryngoscope 1970;43:1–16.
  12. Goyal RK, Martin SB, Shapiro J, Spechler, SJ. The role of cricopharyngeus muscle in pharyngoesophageal disorders. Dysphagia 1993;8:253–258.
  13. Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Dent J, Haebrle B, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC. Effect of sleep, spontaneous gastroesophageal reflux, and a meal on upper esophageal sphincter pressure in normal human volunteers. Gastroenterology 1987;92:466–471. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  14. Cook IJ, Dent J, Collins SM. Upper esophageal sphincter tone and reactivity to stress in patients with a history of globus sensation. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:672–676. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  15. Cook IJ, Dent J, Shannon S, Collins SM. Measurement of upper esophageal sphincter pressure. Effect of acute emotional stress. Gastroenterology 1987;93:526–532. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  16. Jacob P, Kahrilas PJ, Herzon G, McLaughlin B. Determinants of upper esophageal sphincter pressure in dogs. Am J Physiol 1990;259:G245–G251. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  17. Brownlow H, Whitmore I, Willan P. A quantitative study of the histochemical and morphometric characteristics of the human cricopharyngeus muscle. J Anat 1989;166:67–75. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  18. Miller ME, Christiansen GC, Evans HE. Myology. In: Anatomy of the Dog. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1984, pp 154–159.
  19. Crouch J. The muscular system. In: Cat Anatomy. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1969, pp 69–70.
  20. Bonington A, Whitmore I, Mahon M. A histological and histochemical study of the cricopharyngeus muscle in the guinea pig. J Anat 1987;153:151–161. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  21. Kristamundsdottir F, Mahon M, Froes MM, Cumming WJ. Histomorphometric and histological study of the human cricopharyngeus in health and in motor neuron disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1990;26:461–475.
  22. Bonington A, Mahon M, Whitemore I. A histological and histochemical study of the cricopharyngeus muscle in man. J Anat 1988;156:27–37. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  23. Mu L, Sanders I. Neuromuscular organization of the human upper esophageal sphincter. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001;107:370–377.
  24. Mu L, Sanders I. Muscle fiber-type distribution pattern in the human cricopharyngeus muscle. Dysphagia 2002;17:87–96. | Article | PubMed |
  25. Bonington A. The histochemical characteristics of the human cricopharyngeus muscle. J Anat 1986;146:251–257.
  26. Medda BK, Lang IM, Dodds WJ, et al. Correlation of electrical and contractile activities of the cricopharyngeus muscle in the cat. Am J Physiol 1997;273:G470–G479. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  27. Spiro D, Sonenblick EH. Comparison of the structural basis of the contractile process in heart and skeletal muscle. Circ Res 1964;15(suppl 11):14–17.
  28. Mu L, Sanders I. Neuromuscular compartments and fiber-type regionalization in the human inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscle. Anat Rec 2001;264:367–377. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  29. Meyer GW, Austin RM, Brady CE, Castell DO. Muscle anatomy of the human esophagus. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986;8:131–134. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  30. Leese G, Hopwood, D. Muscle fibre typing in the human pharyngeal constrictors and esophagus: effect of aging. J Anat 1986;127:77–80. | ChemPort |
  31. Shedlofsky-Deschamps G, Krause WJ, Cutts JH, Hanson S. Histochemistry of the striated musculature in the opossum and human esophagus. J Anat 1982;134:407–414. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  32. Whitmore I. Oesophageal striated muscle arrangement and histochemical fibre types in guinea-pig, marmoset, macaque, and man. J Anat 1982;134:685–695. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  33. Mascarello F, Rowlerson A, Scapolo PA. The fibre type composition of the striated muscle of the esophagus in ruminants and carnivores. Histochemistry 1984;80:277–288. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  34. Gray H, Goss CM. Anatomy of the Human Body. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1968.
  35. Van Lunteren E, Bass, EP. Metabolic profiles of cat and rat pharyngeal and diaphragm muscles. Respir Physiol 1996;105:171–177. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  36. Bubb WJ, Sims MH. Fiber type composition of rostral and caudal portions of the digastric muscle in the dog. Am J Vet Res 1986;47:1834–1841. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  37. Rokx JTM, Van Willigen JD, Jansen HWB. Muscle fibre types and muscle spindles in the jaw musculature of the rat. Arch Oral Biol 1984;29:25–31. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  38. Dick TE, Van Lunteren E. Fiber subtype distribution of pharyngeal dilator muscles and diaphragm in the cat. J Appl Physiol 1990;687:2237–2240.
  39. Hellstarnd E. Morphological and histochemical properties of tongue muscles in cat. Acta Physiol Scand 1980;110:187–198. | PubMed |
  40. Vignon C, Pellissier JF, Serratrice G. Further histochemical studies on masticatory muscles. J Neurol Sci 1980;45:157–176. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  41. Hisa Y, Malmgren LT, Lyon MJ. Quantitative histochemical studies on the cat infrahyoid muscles. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;103:723–732. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  42. Kobler JB, Datta S, Goyal RK, et al. Innervation of the larynx, pharynx, and upper esophageal sphincter of the rat. J Comp Neurol 1994;349:129–147. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  43. Levitt MN, Dedo HH, Ogura JH. The cricopharyngeus muscle, an electromyographic study in the dog. Laryngoscope 1965;75:122–136. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  44. Sprague JM. The innervation of the pharynx in the rhesus monkey and the formation of the pharyngeal plexus in primates. Anat Rec 1944;90:197–208. | Article |
  45. Mu L, Sanders I. The innervation of the human upper esophageal sphincter. Dysphagia 1996;11:234–238. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  46. Lund WS. A study of the cricopharyngeal sphincter in man and in the dog. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1965;37:225–246. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  47. Hwang K, Grossman MI, Ivy AC. Nervous control of the cervical portion of the esophagus. Am J Physiol 1948;154:343–357.
  48. Fukushima S, Shingai T, Kitagawa J, et al. Role of the pharyngeal branch of the vagus nerve in laryngeal elevation and UES pressure during swallowing in rabbit. Dysphagia 2003;18:58–63. | Article | PubMed |
  49. Venker-van Haagen AJ, Hartman W, Wolvekamp WTC. Contributions of the glossopharyngeal nerve and the pharyngeal branch of the vagus nerve to the swallowing process. Am J Vet Res 1986;47:1300–1307. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  50. Venker van Haagen AJ, Hartman W, Van den Brom WE, Wolvekamp WTC. Continuous electromyographic recordings of pharyngeal muscle activity in normal and previously denervated muscles in dogs. Am J. Vet Res. 1989;50:1725–1728. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  51. Fukunaga Y, Higashino M, Osugi H, Tokuhara T, Kinoshita H. Function of the upper esophageal sphincter after denervation of recurrent laryngeal nerves and intramural nerves of the cervical esophagus in dogs. J Jpn Surg Soc 1994;95:643–654. | ChemPort |
  52. Wilson JA, Pryde A, White A, Maran AGD. Swallowing performance in patients with vocal fold motion impairment. Dysphagia 1995;10:149–154. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  53. Sasaki, CT, Sims H, Kim Y-H, Czibulka A. Motor innervation of the human cricopharyngeus muscle. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:1132–1139. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  54. Hammond CS, Davenport PW, Hutchison A, Otto RA. Motor innervation of the cricopharyngeus muscle by the recurrent laryngeal nerve. J Appl Physiol 1997;83:89–94. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  55. Brok HAJ, Copper MP, Stroeve RJ, Ongerboer BW, Venker-van Haagen AJ, Schouwenburg, PF. Evidence for recurrent laryngeal nerve contribution in motor innervation of the human cricopharyngeal muscle. Laryngoscope 1999;109:705–708. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  56. Gray H, Goss CM. Anatomy of the Human Body. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1968.
  57. Miyazaki J, Shin T, Murata Y, Masuko S. Pharyngeal branch of the vagus nerve carries intraepithelial afferent fibers in the cat pharynx: an elucidation of the origin and central and peripheral distribution of these components. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;120:905–913. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  58. Maeyama, T, Miyazaki J, Tsuda K, Shin T. Distribution and origin of the intraepithelial nerve fibers in the feline pharyngeal mucosa. Acta Oto-Laryngol Suppl 1998;539:87–90. | ChemPort |
  59. Tanaka Y, Yoshida Y, Hirano, M, Morimoto M, Kanaseki T. Intramucosal distribution of the glossopharyngeal sensory fibers of cats. Brain Res Bull 1987;19:115–127. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  60. Yoshida Y, Tanaka Y, Hirano M, Nakashima T. Sensory innervation of the pharynx and larynx. Am J Med 2000;108(suppl):51S–61S.
  61. Wank M, Neuhuber WL. Local differences in vagal afferent innervation of the rat esophagus are reflected by neurochemical differences at the level of the sensory ganglia and by different brainstem projections. J Comp Neurol 2001;435:41–59. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  62. Medda BK, Lang IM, Layman R, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Shaker R. Characterization and quantification of a pharyngo-UES contractile reflex in cats. Am J Physiol 1993;265:G963–G972. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  63. Nagai T. The occurrence and ultrastructure of a mechanoreceptor in the human cricopharyngeus muscle. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1991;248:144–146. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  64. Jacubowicz M, Radziemski A, Kedzia Z. Histological and quantitative studies of the muscle spindles in human fetal infrahyoid muscles. Folia Morphol (Warszawa) 1992;51:55–59.
  65. Yamaoka M, Furusawa K, Fujimoto K, Iguchi K, Kumai T. Muscle spindles in the mylohyoid muscle of rats. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 1992;21:309–312. | ChemPort |
  66. Muntener M, Gottschall J, Neuhuber W, Mysicka A, Zenker W. The ansa cervicalis and the infrahyoid muscles of the rat. I. Anatomy; distribution, number and diameter of fiber types; motor units. Anat Embryol 1980;159:49–57. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  67. Maier A. Occurrence and distribution of muscle spindles in masticatory and suprahyoid muscles of the rat. Am J Anat 1979;155:483–505. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  68. Van Willigen JD, Morimoto T, Broekhuijsen ML, Bijl GK, Inoue T. An electromyographic study of whether the digastric muscles are controlled by jaw-closing proprioceptors in man. Arch Oral Biol 1993;38:497–505. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  69. Kuehn DP, Templeton PJ, Maynard JA. Muscle spindles in the velopharyngeal musculature of humans. J Speech Hearing Res 1990;33:488–493. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  70. Liss, M. Muscle spindles in human levator velo palatini ands palatoglossus muscles. J Speech Hearing Res 1990;33:736–746. | PubMed |
  71. Tadaki N, Hisa Y, Uno T, Koike S, Okamura H, Ibata Y. Neurotransmitters for the canine inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscle. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:755–759. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  72. Terenghi G, Polak JM, Rodrigo J, Mulderry PL, Bloom SR. Calcitonin gene-related peptide-immunoreactive nerves in the tongue, epiglottis and pharynx of the rat: occurrence, distribution and origin. Brain Res 1986;365:1–14. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  73. Rodrigo J, Polak JM, Fernandez L, Ghatei MP, Mulderry P, Bloom SR. Calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactive sensory and motor nerves of the rat, cat, and monkey esophagus. Gastroenterology 1985;88:444–451. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  74. Hudson LC. The origins of innervation of the canine caudal pharyngeal muscles: an HRP study. Brain Res 1986;374:413–418. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  75. Lawn AM. The localization in the nucleus ambiguus of the rabbit of the cells of origin of motor nerve fibers in the glossopharyngeal nerve and various branches of the vagus nerve by means of retrograde degeneration. J Comp Neurol 1966;127:293–306. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  76. Kitamura S, Ogata K, Nishiguchi T, Nagase Y, Shigenaga Y. Localization of the motoneurons supplying the rabbit pharyngeal constrictor muscles and the peripheral course of their axons: a study using retrograde HRP or fluorescent labeling technique. Anat Rec 1989;229:399–406.
  77. Hisa Y, Sato F, Suzuki Y, Yanohara K, Hyuga M, Mizukoshi O. The localization of motoneurons innervating the canine pharyngeal constrictor muscles in the posterior larynx by the fluorescent double-labeling technique. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1984;241:83–87. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  78. Bieger D, Hopkins DA. Viscerotopic representation of the upper alimentary tract in the medulla oblongata in the rat: the nucleus ambiguus. J Comp Neurol 1987;262:546–562. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  79. Holstege G, Graveland G, Bijker-Biemond C, Schuddeboom I. Location of motoneurons innervating soft palate, pharynx and upper esophagus. Anatomical evidence for a possible swallowing center in the pontine reticular formation. An HRP autoradiographic tracing study. Brain Behav Evol 1983;23:47–62. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  80. Collman PI, Tremblay L, Diamant N. The central efferent supply to the esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter of the cat. Gastroenterology 1993;104:1430–1438. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  81. Lawn AM. The localization by means of electrical stimulation of the origin and path in the medulla oblongata of the motor nerve fibers of the rabbit esophagus. J Physiol 1964;174:232–244. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  82. Fryscak T, Zenker W, Kantner D. Afferent and efferent innervation of the rat esophagus. Anat Embyol 1984;63–70.
  83. Kruszewska B, Lipski J, Kanjhan R. An electrophysiological and morphological study of esophageal motoneurons in rats. Am J Physiol 1994;266:R622–R632. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  84. Doty RW, Richmond WH, Storey AT. Effect of medullary lesions on coordination of deglutition. Exp Neurol 1967;17:91–106. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  85. Altschuler SM, Bao X, Miselis RR. Dendritic architecture of nucleus ambiguus motoneurons projecting to the upper alimentary tract in the rat. J. Comp Neurol 1991;309:402–414. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  86. Hayakawa, T, Yajima T, Zyo K. Ultrastructural characterization of pharyngeal and esophageal motoneurons in the nucleus ambiguus of the rat. J Comp Neurol 1996;370:135–146. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  87. Grelot L, Barillot JC, Bianchi AL. Pharyngeal motoneurons: respiratory-related activity and response to laryngeal afferents in the decerebrate cat. Exp Brain Res 1989;78:336–344. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  88. Altschuler SM, Bao X, Bieger D, Hopkins DA, Miselis RR. Viscerotopic representation of the upper alimentary tract in the rat: sensory ganglia and nuclei of the solitary tract and spinal trigeminal tracts. J Comp Neurol 1989;283:248–268. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  89. Brousard DL, Lyon RB, Wiedner EB, Altschuler SM. Solitarial premotor neuron projections to the rat esophagus and pharynx: implications for control of swallowing. Gastroenterology 1998;114:1268–1275. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  90. Boa X, Wiedner EB, Altschuler SM. Transynaptic localization of pharyngeal premotor neurons in rat. Brain Res 1995;696:246–249. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  91. Hayakawa T, Takanaga A, Maeda S, Seki M, Yajima Y. Subnuclear distribution of afferents from the oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal regions in the nucleus tractus solitarii of the rat: a study using transganglionic transport of cholera toxin. Neurosci Res 2001;39:221–232. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  92. Lang IM, Dean C, Medda BK, Aslam M, Shaker R. Differential activation of medullary vagal nuclei during different phases of swallowing in the cat. Brain Res 2004;1014:145–163. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  93. Collman PI, Tremblay L, Diamant NE. The distribution of spinal and vagal sensory neurons that innervate the esophagus of the cat. Gastroenterology 1992;103:817–822. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  94. Hudson LC, Cummings JF. The origins of innervation of the esophagus of the dog. Brain Res 1985;326:125–136. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  95. Neuhuber WL, Kressel M, Stark A, Berthoud HR. Vagal efferent and afferent innervation of the rat esophagus as demonstrated by anterograde DiI and DiA tracing: focus on myenteric ganglia. J Auton Nerv Syst 1998;70:92–102. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  96. Qin C, Chandler MJ, Jou CI, Foreman RD. Responses and afferent pathways of C1–C2 spinal neurons to cervical and thoracic esophageal stimulation in rats. J Neurophysiol 2004;91:2227–2235. | PubMed |
  97. Qin, C, Chandler MJ, Foreman RD. Afferent pathways and responses of T3–T4 spinal neurons to cervical and thoracic esophageal distensions in rats. Auton Neurosci Basic Clin 2003;109:10–20.
  98. Barrett RT, Bao X, Miselis RR, Altschuler SM. Brain stem localization of rodent esophageal premotor neurons revealed by transneuronal passage of pseudorabies virus. Gastroenterology 1994;107:728–737. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  99. Castell JA, Dalton CB, Castell DO. Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter manometry in humans. Am J Physiol 1990;258:G173–G178 1990. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  100. Wilson JA, Pryde A, Cecillia A, Macintyre CC, Heading RC. Normal pharyngoesophageal motility. A study of 50 healthy subjects. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:1590–1599. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  101. Cook IJ, Dent J, Collins SM. Upper esophageal sphincter tone an reactivity to stress in patients with a history of globus sensation. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:672–676. | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |
  102. Lang IM, Sarna, SK, Dodds WJ. The pharyngeal, esophageal, and gastric responses associated with vomiting. Am J Physiol 1993;265:G963–G972. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  103. Lang IM, Dana N, Medda BK, Shaker R. Mechanisms of airway protection during retching, vomiting, and swallowing. Am J Physiol 2002;283:G529–G536. | ChemPort |
  104. Hesse O. Zur Kenntnes des Brechaktes. Nach Roentgenversuchen an Hunden. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol 1913;152:1–22.
  105. Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Dent J, Wyman JB, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC. Upper esophageal function during belching. Gastroenterology 1986;91:133–140. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  106. Shaker R, Ren J, Kern M, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Li Q. Mechanisms of airway protection and upper esophageal sphincter opening during belching. Am J Physiol 1992;262:G621–G628. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  107. Monges H, Salducci J, Naudy B. The upper esophageal sphincter during vomiting, eructation, and distension of the cardia: an electromyographic study in the unanesthetized dog. In: Duthie HL, ed. Gastrointestinal Motility in Health and Disease. Lancaster, PA MTP Press, 1978:575–583.
  108. Shaker R, Ren J, Xie P, Lang IM, Bardan E, Sui Z. Characterization of the pharyngo-UES contractile reflex in humans. Am J Physiol 1997;273:G854–G858. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  109. Reynolds RPE, Effer GW, Bendeck MP. The upper esophageal sphincter in the cat:the role of central innervation assessed by transient vagal blockade. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1987;65:96–99. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  110. Freiman JM, El-Sharkaway TY, Diamant NE. Effect of bilateral vagosympathetic nerve blockade on response of the dog upper esophageal sphincter (UES) to intraesophageal distention and acid. Gastroenterology 1981;81:78–84. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  111. Enzmann DR, Harell GS, Zboralske FF. Upper esophageal responses to intraluminal distension in man. Gastroenterology 1977;72:1292–1298. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  112. Lang IM, Medda BK, Shaker R. Mechanisms of reflexes induced by esophageal distension. Am J Physiol 2001;281:G1246–G1263. | ChemPort |
  113. Andreollo NA, Thompson DG, Kendall GP, Earlam RJ. Responses of the upper esophageal sphincter and esophageal body to graded intraluminal distension. Braz J Med Biol Res 1987;20:165– 173. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  114. Andreollo NA, Thompson DG, Kendall GP, McIntyre AS, Earlam RJ. Motor responses of the upper esophageal sphincter and body to intraluminal acid. Braz J Med Biol Res 1989;22:51–60. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  115. Vakil NB, Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Vanagunas A. Absence of an upper esophageal sphincter response to acid reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 1989;84:606–610. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  116. Gerhardt DC, Shuck TJ, Bordeaux RA, Winship DH. Human upper esophageal sphincter response to volume, osmotic and acid stimuli. Gastroenterology 1978;75:268–274. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  117. Wallin L, Boesby S, Madsen T. The effect of HCl infusion in the lower part of the esophagus on the pharyngo-esophageal sphincter pressure in normal subjects. Scand J Gastroenterol 1978;13:821–826. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  118. Shaker R, Dodds WJ, Ren J, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC. Esophagoglottal closure reflex: a mechanism of airway protection. Gastroenterology 1992;102:857–861. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  119. Shaker R, Ren J, Medda BK, Lang IM, Cowles V, Jaradeh S. Identification and characterization of the esophagoglottal closure reflex in a feline model. Am J Physiol 1994;266:G147–G153. | PubMed | ChemPort |
  120. Netter FH. The CIBA Collection of Medical Illustrations: Digestive System, Part 1. West Caldwell, NJ: CIBA, 1989.

Extra navigation