Table 1 - Laparoscopic versus open fundoplication results of four randomized controlled trials
From the following article
Surgical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease
Renee C. Minjarez and Blair A. Jobe
GI Motility online (2006)
doi:10.1038/gimo56
| First author | Year | Follow-up period | Postoperative dysphagia | DeMeester score or median acid exposure times | Lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) (mmHg) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NR, not reported. | ||||||||
Chrysos E, Tsiaoussis J, Athanasakis E, Zoras O, Vassilakis JS, Xynos E. Laparoscopic vs open approach for Nissen fundoplication. A comparative study. Surg Endosc 2002;16(12):1679–1684. Epub 2002 May 3. | ||||||||
Nilsson G, Wenner J, Larsson S, Johnsson F. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux.Br J Surg 2004;91(5):552–559. | ||||||||
| Open | Laparoscopic | Open | Laparoscopic | Open | Laparoscopic | |||
| Chrysos | 2002 | 12 months | 11 (22%) | 13 (23%) | 11  5 | 12 4 | 25 7 | 26 7 |
| Ackroyd25 | 2004 | 12 months | 9 (23%) | 11 (26%) | 0.1% (0–5.5) | 0.4% (0–7.3) | NR | NR |
| Nilsson | 2004 | 5 years | 5/23 (22%) | 7/17 (41%) | Normal | Normal | 17 | 15 |
© 2019 Nature is part of Springer Nature. All Rights Reserved.
