Thousands of cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) are performed each year. In the US, multiple births occur after 39% of IVF cycles, whereas in Europe, the figure is 26%. Indeed, multiple births are a major factor in the costs attributable to IVF. Reducing the multiple birth rate may reduce the overall costs of IVF, and providing insurance coverage of IVF may contribute to lowering multiple birth rates. The use of IVF is likely to expand in response to increases in infertility and scientific advances.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care
BMC Medical Ethics Open Access 25 April 2020
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 1998 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates: National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports <http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/drh/art98> (2001).
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1998 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil. Steril. 77, 18–31 (2002).
Nygren, K.G. & Andersen, A.N. Hum. Reprod. 16, 2459–2471 (2001).
Abma, J., Chandra, A., Mosher, W., Peterson, L. & Piccinino, L. Vital Health Stat. 23, 1–114 (1997).
Stern, Z., Laufer, N., Levy, R., Ben-Shushan, D. & Mor-Yosef, S. Israel J. Med. Sci. 31, 492–496 (1995).
Trad, F.S., Hornstein, M.D. & Barbieri, R.L. J. Assisted Reprod. Genet. 12, 418–421 (1995).
Goldfarb, J.M., Austin, C., Lisbona, H., Peskin, B. & Clapp, M. Obstet. Gynecol. 87, 18–21 (1996).
Neumann, P.J., Gharib, S.D. & Weinstein, M.C. New Engl. J. Med. 331, 239–243 (1994).
Haan, G. & van Steen, R . Hum. Reprod. 7, 982–986 (1992).
Legro, R.S., Shackleford, D.P., Moessner, J.M., Gnatuk, C.L. & Dodson, W.C. J. Reprod. Med. 42, 76–82 (1997).
Collins, J. Semin. Reprod. Med. 19, 279–289 (2001).
Stovall, D.W., Allen, B.D., Sparks, A.E.T., Syrop, C.H., Saunders, R.G. & VanVoorhis, B.J Fertil. Steril. 72, 778–784 (1999).
Griffin, M. & Panak, W.F. Fertil. Steril. 70, 22–29 (1998).
New Zealand National Advisory Committee on Core Health and Disability Support Services (Core Servicers Committee, Wellington, 1995).
University of Leeds School of Public Health Effective Health Care Bulletin No. 3 (1992).
Granberg, M., Wikland, M. & Hamberger L. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 77, 63–67 (1998).
Mol, B.W.J., Bonsel, G.J., Collins, J.A., Wiegerinck, M.A.H.M., van der Veen, F. & Bossuyt, P.M.M. Fertil. Steril. 73, 748–754 (2000).
Callahan, T.L., Hall, J.E., Ettner, S.L., Christiansen, C.L., Greene, M.F. & Crowley, W.F. New Engl. J. Med. 331, 244–249 (1994).
Lipitz, S., Frenkel, Y., Watts, C., Ben-Rafael, Z. & Reichman, B. Obstet. Gynecol. 76, 215–218 (1990).
Hack, M., Flannery, D.J., Schluchter, M., Cartar, L., Borawski, E. & Klein, N. New Engl. J. Med. 346, 149–157 (2002).
Rorty, M.V. & Pinkerton, J.V. J. Contemp. Health Law Policy 13, 53–77 (1996).
Strömberg, B., Dahlquist, G., Ericson, A., Finnström, O., Köster, M. & Stjernqvist, K. Lancet 359, 461–465 (2002).
Schieve, L.A., Meikle, S.F., Ferre, C., Peterson, H.B., Jeng, G. & Wilcox, L.S. New Engl. J. Med. 346, 731–737 (2002).
Hansen, M., Kurinczuk, J.J., Bower, C. & Webb, S. New Engl. J. Med. 346, 725–730 (2002).
Hughes, E.G. & Giacomini, M. Fertil. Steril. 76, 431–442 (2001).
Evans, D. Br. Med. J. 311, 1586–1587 (1995).
Collins, J.A., Bustillo, M., Visscher, R.D. & Lawrence, L.D. Fertil. Steril. 64, 538–545 (1995).
Collins, J.A. New Engl. J. Med. 331, 270–271 (1994).
Jones, H.W. & Schnorr, J.A. Fertil. Steril. 75, 11–13 (2001).
IFFS Surveillance 01. Chapter 3: Fertil. Steril. 76, (suppl.) S12–S13 (2001).
Charter, D. & Rumbelow, H. The (London) Times 13 April 2002 <http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,2-265423,00.html>.
Faber, K. Hum. Reprod. 12, 1614–1616 (1997).
Frankfurter, D. et al. Fertil. Steril. 70, IFFS Annual Meeting Program Supplement, S51 (1998).
Gerris, J. & Van Royen, E. Hum. Reprod. 15, 1884–1888 (2000).
The Bertarelli Foundation Scientific Board. Hum. Reprod. 15, 330–334 (2000).
Neuman, P.J. J. Health Politics Policy Law 22, 1215–1239 (1997).
Stephen, E.H. & Chandra, A. Fertil. Steril. 70, 30–34 (1998).
Acknowledgements
P.K., R.N and J.S. are supported in part by grant number P01-HD-37074 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Katz, P., Nachtigall, R. & Showstack, J. The economic impact of the assisted reproductive technologies. Nat Med 8 (Suppl 10), S29–S32 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm-fertilityS29
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm-fertilityS29
This article is cited by
-
Autonomous decisions by couples in reproductive care
BMC Medical Ethics (2020)
-
Impact of ART on pregnancies in California: an analysis of maternity outcomes and insights into the added burden of neonatal intensive care
Journal of Perinatology (2014)