Sir,
The term ‘poppers’ refers to exogenous volatile nitric oxide (NO) donors that have been widely abused for recreational purposes. Inhalation of poppers provides rapid-onset, short-acting euphoria and myorelaxation. Several reports described persistent visual loss after poppers consumption.1, 2
In all presented patients, functional and morphologic damage was limited to the fovea.1, 2 We report two patients who not only developed a characteristic maculopathy following poppers consumption but also additionally showed a bilateral decline in full-field electroretinography (ERG). A 45-year old and a 33-year old male patient presented with a bilateral visual loss (0.63/0.4 and 0.5/0.4). Funduscopic examination revealed bilateral, foveal yellowish dots. Figure 1 shows a pathologic full-field ERG. Electrooculography gave normal Arden ratios. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) showed central hyperreflective alterations in the photoreceptor layer and an interruption of the ellipzoid zone. The former patient reported only sporadic consumption. The latter regularly consumed poppers over 1 year and stopped at the diagnosis notification. Interestingly, 6 month follow-up of the latter showed a restitution of foveal architecture in SD-OCT; however, pathologic changes in ERG persisted.
High concentrations of NO are suspected to represent the underlying cause of retinal damage linked to poppers intake.2 NO regulates photoreceptor metabolism in rods and cones primarily through activation of guanylyl cyclase, a key enzyme of phototransduction.3 Experimental studies showed that higher doses of NO induce apoptotic cell death in photoreceptors.4
Our electrophysiological data suggest that retinal toxicity of poppers is not restricted to central cone photoreceptors only, as suggested by previous reports, but that damage may well extend peripherally also affecting rod photoreceptors. It remains elusive whether the degree of retinal damage and the involvement of rods depend on the highest level of local NO concentration or on frequency, subtype, or amount of poppers intake.
Albeit morphologic similarities in SD-OCT, a previously suggested light-induced damage seems less plausible given our findings in full-field ERG.5 Other than photopic maculopathy, differential diagnosis includes adult onset vitelliform dystrophy and occult macular dystrophy.
Our report suggests a change in nomenclature from poppers maculopathy to poppers retinopathy, emphasizes the harmful potential of poppers consumption and stresses the need for a higher level of awareness.
References
Audo I, El Sanharawi M, Vignal-Clermont C, Villa A, Morin A, Conrath J et al. Foveal damage in habitual poppers users. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129: 703–708.
Fajgenbaum MA . Is the mechanism of 'poppers maculopathy' photic injury? Eye (Lond) 2013; 27: 1420–1421.
Ju WK, Chung IW, Kim KY, Gwon JS, Lee MY, Oh SJ et al. Sodium nitroprusside selectively induces apoptotic cell death in the outer retina of the rat. Neuroreport 2001; 12: 4075–4079.
Sato M, Ohtsuka T . Opposite effects of nitric oxide on rod and cone photoreceptors of rat retina in situ. Neurosci Lett 2010; 473 (1): 62–66.
Vignal-Clermont C, Audo I, Sahel JA, Paques M . Poppers-associated retinal toxicity. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1583–1585.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clemens, C., Alten, F., Loos, D. et al. Poppers maculopathy or retinopathy?. Eye 29, 148–149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.252
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.252