Introduction

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is currently the most common cause of incurable blindness and visual impairment in industrialized countries.1 Prevention of AMD is hampered by a lack of knowledge about the aetiology of the disease and about the identity of modifiable risk factors.

Several studies using colour Doppler imaging have reported that circulatory abnormalities are present in the posterior ciliary arteries and in the central retinal artery in patients with AMD.2, 3, 4, 5 A common finding has been an increase in the pulsatility of the blood speed in these arteries. The interpretation of such a finding, however, remains ambiguous, since an increase in pulsatility can be associated with pathology either proximal or distal to the measurement site. In order to resolve this ambiguity, it is necessary to determine the actual blood flow rate, which requires knowledge of the arterial diameter at the measurement site as well as the time-average blood speed during the cardiac cycle. Colour Doppler imaging does not provide these measurements. Although impaired foveal choroidal capillary blood flow has been found in AMD using laser Doppler flowmetry,6 there has been no previous report on haemodynamic abnormalities in the major retinal vessels in patients with AMD.

In this study, we measured the actual blood flow rate as well as the pulsatile characteristics of the blood flow in an effort to determine whether there is intraretinal vascular pathology associated with AMD, or whether the haemodynamic abnormalities measured in retinal arteries simply reflect a more generalized systemic vascular pathology in patients with AMD.

Methods

Patients from Schepens Retina Associates Foundation were enrolled in the study. In all, 25 patients with AMD and nine age-matched healthy control subjects were examined. Patients with AMD who also had other diseases of the eye that might possibly affect the retinal circulation, such as diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, or those with a history of laser treatment or intraocular surgery, were excluded. All subjects were informed about the nature of the study and gave their consent to be included. The research followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects underwent a complete ophthalmic examination including slit-lamp biomicroscopy, Snellen visual acuity, and intraocular pressure measurement. Stereoscopic colour fundus photographs were taken using a Topcon TRC-50EX fundus camera (Topcon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The photographs were used for classifying the degree of severity of the AMD according to the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) system.7 Eyes were classified into four AREDS categories by an examiner (ES) without knowledge of the retinal haemodynamic results: Category 1, few if any small drusen; Category 2, extensive small drusen or nonextensive intermediate-sized drusen; Category 3, extensive intermediate-sized drusen, at least one large drusen, or noncentral geographic atrophy; or Category 4, evidence of neovascular AMD or central geographic atrophy. In our study, we combined those in Categories 1 and 2 into a Mild group. Those in Category 3 were designated as a Moderate group, and those in Category 4 as a Severe group. Only one eye of each subject was included. In patients with AMD, the study eye was selected randomly when both eyes were classified with the same AMD severity. The eye with the more severe AMD was selected when the AMD severity was asymmetric. The characteristics of the control subjects and the patients in each AMD group are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of control subjects and patients with AMD

The Canon laser Doppler Flowmeter model CLBF 100 (Canon, Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure the blood column diameter (D), the centreline blood velocity (V), and the blood flow (F) in major temporal retinal arteries.8 The instrument is equipped with an automatic eye tracking system that maintains centration of the laser beam measuring on the target blood vessel even during eye movements. The beam from a red 675-nm diode laser is used for blood velocity measurements. The Doppler-shifted light scattered from the flowing blood cells in the target vessel is detected simultaneously in two directions separated by a fixed angle. The signals from two photomultiplier tube detectors undergo computer-controlled spectrum analysis, and sequential measurements of V are performed automatically. Results are acquired at 50 measurements per second for 2 s, yielding quasicontinuous traces of the systolic–diastolic variation of the arterial blood velocity.

Three indices of pulsatility, the pulsatility ratio (PR), the pulsatility index (PI), and the resistivity index (RI) (also known as Pourcelot's ratio9), were calculated from the blood velocity traces. PR is expressed as PSV/EDV, where PSV is the peak velocity during systole and EDV is the end diastolic velocity; PI is expressed as (PSV−EDV)/MV, where MV is the time-average mean velocity during the cardiac cycle; RI is expressed as (PSV−EDV)/PSV.

Student's unpaired t-test was used for the comparison of differences between control subjects and patients with AMD. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for multiple comparisons. Significances of individual differences were evaluated by using the Scheffe F-test if ANOVA was significant. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to determine whether PR, PI, or RI was correlated with the severity of AMD.

Results

Figure 1 shows representative fundus photographs of a control subject (A), and patients with a Mild (B), Moderate (C), and Severe AMD (D).

Figure 1
figure 1

Representative fundus photographs from each group: (a) control subject, (b) mild AMD with small drusen, (c) moderate AMD with early geographic atrophy, and (d) severe AMD with a choroidal neovascular membrane.

Figure 2 shows the variation during cardiac cycles of the centreline blood velocity measured in a major temporal retinal artery in a control subject and in a patient with AMD. The blood flow is markedly more pulsatile in the patient with AMD compared to that in the control subject.

Figure 2
figure 2

Variation during cardiac cycles of the centreline blood velocity measured in a major temporal retinal artery in a control subject (left) and in a patient with AMD (right). Vertical lines indicate the beginning and end of the time window during which the time-averaged mean velocity is computed.

The values of PR, PI, and RI in the patients with AMD and in the control group are shown in Table 2. Each index was significantly higher in the patients than in the controls.

Table 2 PR, PI, and RI in AMD patients and in controlsa

As shown in Figure 3, PR increased monotonically from 4.2±1.2 (mean±SD) in the control group to 6.4±2.7 in the mild group to 7.8±3.8 in the moderate group to 9.5±5.1 in the severe group (Spearman's ρ=0.59, P=0.0010). Similarly, PI increased monotonically from 1.4±0.3 in the control group to 1.7±0.2 in the mild group to 1.8±0.4 in the moderate group to 2.0±0.5 in the severe group and correlated with the severity of AMD (Spearman's ρ=0.52, P=0.0042). Also, RI increased monotonically from 0.75±0.07 in the control group to 0.82±0.06 in the mild group to 0.84±0.09 in the moderate group to 0.87±0.06 in the severe group and correlated with the severity of AMD (Spearman's ρ=0.59, P=0.0010). ANOVA was statistically significant for PR (P=0.022), PI (P=0.017), and RI (P=0.0076). PR (P=0.031), PI (P=0.023), and RI (P=0.012) were each significantly higher in the severe group compared to the control group (Scheffe F-test).

Figure 3
figure 3

Distributions of PR (left), PI (centre), and RI (right). Black squares represent mean value, and bars represent SD. Spearman's correlation analysis showed significant correlations between each index and the degree of severity of AMD.

As shown in Figure 4, mean velocity was 31.9±8.3 mm/s in the control group, 34.5±9.6 mm/s in the mild group, 25.8±9.2 mm/s in the moderate group, and 29.5±8.8 mm/s in the severe group. Diameter was 106±9 μm in the control group, 110±11 μm in the mild group, 108±16 μm in the moderate group, and 120±12 μm in the severe group. Flow was 8.4±3.1 μl/min in the control group, 10.7±4.7 μl/min in the mild group, 7.4±4.0 μl/min in the moderate group, and 10.2±3.9 μl/min in the severe group. There were no significant correlations between mean velocity, diameter or flow, and severity of AMD. There were no significant differences in mean velocity, diameter, or flow across the four groups.

Figure 4
figure 4

Distributions of mean velocity (left), diameter (centre), and flow (right). Black squares represent mean value, and bars represent SD. There were no significant differences in mean velocity, diameter, or flow across the four groups.

Discussion

This study demonstrates that blood flow in retinal arteries is more pulsatile in patients with AMD than in healthy controls. Furthermore, all three indices of pulsatility (PR, PI, and RI) increased monotonically with increasing severity of AMD. However, the average retinal blood flow and average retinal blood velocity were not significantly different across the four groups. Our finding of no decrease in the average blood flow rate in patients with AMD is consistent with the results of Medeiros et al,10 who reported that there was no detectable loss of ganglion cell layer (GCL) neurons in nonexudative AMD and that relatively many GCL neurons survive even in exudative AMD despite massive photoreceptor loss. When GCL neurons degenerate and die, it is likely that both retinal metabolism and retinal blood flow would be decreased. Clearly, this is not the case in AMD. The retinal haemodynamic results in the patients with severe AMD appear to be part of a continuum of changes seen across the four study subgroups. The damage associated with mild, moderate, or severe AMD affects the outer retina and seemingly spares the inner retina, which is nourished by the retinal circulation.

Typically, an increased PR, PI, or RI is an indicator of increased vascular resistance to flow and/or decreased vascular compliance,11, 12 distal to the measurement site. If this were the case, however, then the average blood flow would also be reduced. The average retinal blood flow was not significantly different across the four groups in the present study. Such retinal haemodynamic results in patients with AMD indicate that there may be a more generalized circulatory abnormality proximal to the eye. Specifically, it is likely that patients with AMD have a stiffer, less compliant arterial vasculature leading to the eye, and that the loss of compliance of the large blood vessels is due to age-related degenerative changes in collagen and elastin.13

A recent histopathological study14 has shown that in patients with AMD, the macular Bruch's membrane, comprised of inner and outer collagen-rich layers flanking a central layer of elastin and elastin-associated proteins, is thinner and more porous than in age-matched controls. The increased porosity is due to larger gaps in the elastin layer in eyes with AMD. As the authors of this study point out, it is not clear whether the elastin layer degrades more rapidly in eyes with AMD, or whether the deficit of elastin is present from the time of birth. In either case, it is the deficit of elastin, both in Bruch's membrane and in the walls of large conduit arteries, that likely links AMD with the stiffening of the systemic vasculature and the resulting haemodynamic changes observed in the retina. In the conduit arteries, the fracture of elastin fibres leads to the transfer of stress to collagen fibres, which are 100–1000 times stiffer than elastin,15 while in Bruch's membrane, gaps in the elastin layer provide the substrate for the development of AMD.

Epidemiological studies have also shown that patients with AMD often have concomitant systemic vascular disease such as arterial hypertension, atherosclerosis, or hypercholesteraemia.1, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 In fact, as shown in Table 1, a number of our study patients with AMD were being treated for these disorders. Smoking, hypertension, and elevated serum cholesterol have been shown to be risk factors for both AMD and cardiovascular disease. Specifically, it has been reported that a high total serum cholesterol level is a risk factor for both neovascular AMD and geographic atrophy.21 In addition, there have been reports linking statin use with a lower risk of AMD.22, 23 Statins, hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, are prescribed to help reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by inhibiting cholesterol production and increasing LDL cholesterol removal from plasma. The overlap in risk factors for AMD and cardiovascular disease has led to the suggestion that a common disease mechanism may be operative in both AMD and cardiovascular disease.

Friedman24, 25, 26 has suggested that AMD shares both risk factors and pathogenetic mechanisms with atherosclerosis, resulting in the deposition of lipid in the sclera and in Bruch's membrane. He proposes an alternate explanation for the ocular haemodynamic abnormalities observed in AMD, suggesting that an increasingly rigid sclera would act to encapsulate the ocular vasculature in a more incompressible compartment, leading to a greater degree of systolic–diastolic variation in the blood velocity during the cardiac cycle. The answer to the question of whether AMD-related haemodynamic abnormalities are due to increased scleral rigidity, increased systemic vascular rigidity, or both awaits further investigation.

In summary, our results add support to the conjecture that AMD and cardiovascular disease share the same modifiable risk factors. Treatments aimed at preventing systemic arterial rigidity may also be effective in preventing the onset or slowing the progression of AMD.