Review
Eye (2006) 20, 1189–1195. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702382
Imaging features of ocular adnexal lymphoproliferative disease
Proprietary interest statement: The authors have no proprietary interests in any of the products mentioned in this paper
Meeting presentation: Presented in part at the 2005 Cambridge Ophthalmological Symposium, Cambridge, England, Sept 2005
T J Sullivan1,2 and A A Valenzuela1
- 1Eyelid, Lacrimal and Orbital Clinic, Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Queensland, Australia
- 2Department of Surgery, University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Queensland, Australia
Correspondence: TJ Sullivan, Eyelid, Lacrimal, and Orbital Clinic, Division of Ophthalmology, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia. Tel: +61 7 383 10101; Fax: +61 7 383 13203. E-mail: tjs@gil.com.au
Received 12 March 2006; Accepted 22 March 2006.
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the imaging characteristics of a cohort of patients with ocular adnexal lymphoproliferative disease (OALD).
Methods
A noncomparative retrospective review between 1992 and 1995 and prospective study from 1995 to 2005 of the clinical, imaging and treatment of 105 patients presenting to tertiary orbital referral centre presenting with OALD.
Results
One hundred and five patients (mean age 61 years, range 11–90 years) with equal gender distribution were included. Fifty-three were primary and 52 were secondary. Computed tomography (CT) usually showed a well-circumscribed lesion of greater than brain density, moulding to adjacent tissues with moderate enhancement. Aggressive histology was associated with bone destruction, while moulding was associated with indolent histology (P<0.005).
MRI in OALD showed intermediate signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images and moderate enhancement with gadolinium. Gallium scanning sensitivity to detect ocular adnexal disease was 25 and 57% for systemic involvement. Positron emission tomography (PET) upstaged (71%) of patients with systemic lymphoproliferative involvement, having a higher sensitivity than CT in detecting distant disease (86 vs 72%).
Conclusions
CT and/or MRI are essential in the evaluation of OALD and can be used to establish that an orbital lesion may be lymphoprolifetaive in nature. Further, these imaging modalities may predict the behaviour of the lymphoma in certain cases. Gallium scanning provides no additional information to CT and does not influence patient treatment. PET represents an important addition to the assessment of OALD with real impact on patient management.
Keywords:
lymphoma, ocular adnexa, CT, MRI, PET, gallium
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Chlamydial infection: the link with ocular adnexal lymphomas
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology Review (01 Nov 2009)
MALT lymphoma: from morphology to molecules
Nature Reviews Cancer Perspective (01 Aug 2004)
Eye Review

