Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
Eye
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
About the society
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 
March 2002, Volume 16, Number 2, Pages 117-120
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF
Clinical Study
Phacoemulsification cataract surgery and unplanned anterior vitrectomy¾is it bad news?
J H Y Tan and W S S Karwatowski

Department of Ophthalmology Leicester Royal Infirmary Leicester, LE1 5WW UK

Correspondence to: J H Y Tan, E-mail: jtan_ophth@yahoo.co.uk

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to determine the final visual outcome of patients who undergo complicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery in which the posterior capsule is compromised and vitrectomy was required.

Methods Data were collected for patients operated on over an 18-month period from the 1st of January till the 24th of June 1999 at the Department of Ophthalmology, Leicester Royal Infirmary. All grades of surgeons were included and patients were identified from the theatre logbook. A standard proforma was completed and the data evaluated.

Results A total of 2538 phacoemulsification cataract operations were performed over this duration. Of these, 2446 (96.4%) had uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery while 92 (3.6%) required anterior vitrectomy.

In order to allow for a more accurate interpretation of the visual outcome, patients were divided into two groups, depending on whether or not there was pre-existing eye disease at initial listing.

Sixty-five patients did not have pre-existing eye disease. From this, notes were available for 57 patients, whereby the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was obtained postoperatively.

Vision of 6/12 or better was used to define acceptable postoperative vision. This group consisted of 49 patients (86%): five had visual acuities of 6/12, 26 = 6/9, one = 6/7.5 and 17 = 6/6. There were eight (14%) patients with poor visual outcome, largely represented by patients with cystoid macular oedema (8.8%).

The most frequent stage of vitreous loss was during primary phacoemulsification in 46 (50%). Irrigation and aspiration, which resulted in 21 (23%) instances, followed this.

The rate of posterior capsule rupture and anterior vitrectomy during phacoemulsification cataract surgery is 2% when performed by consultants, 4% by specialist registrars and staff grades and 10% by senior house officers.

Conclusion This study looks at the final visual outcome of patients who underwent unplanned anterior vitrectomy during routine phacoemulsification cataract surgery, in a university teaching hospital in the United Kingdom. It includes all levels of surgeons with varying experience. The rate of vitreous loss in this study for phacoemulsification cataract surgery is 3.6%. Patients who undergo complicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery do comparatively well.

Eye (2002) 16, 117-120. DOI: 10.1038/sj/EYE/6700015

Keywords

phacoemulsification; cataract; vitrectomy; complications; visual outcome

Received 19 April 2001; accepted 21 September 2001
March 2002, Volume 16, Number 2, Pages 117-120
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Full text  PDF
Privacy Policy © 2002 Nature Publishing Group