Letter to the Editor

Subject Category: Antimicrobials and drug resistance

Citation: Emerging Microbes & Infections (2015) 4, e51; doi:10.1038/emi.2015.51
Published online 19 August 2015

There is an Erratum (2 September 2015) associated with this article.

Persister mechanisms in Borrelia burgdorferi: implications for improved intervention

Jie Feng, Wanliang Shi, Shuo Zhang and Ying Zhang

Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

Correspondence: Y Zhang, E-mail: yzhang@jhsph.edu

Received 11 July 2015; Revised 1 August 2015; Accepted 5 August 2015


Dear Editor,

Lyme disease caused by Borrelia burgdorferi is the most common vector borne disease in the United States and Europe.1,2 The current treatment for Lyme disease is a 2-4 week antibiotic monotherapy with doxycycline, amoxicillin or cefuroxime.3 While this treatment is effective for the majority of Lyme disease patients, about 10%-20% of patients still have persisting symptoms such as fatigue, muscular pain, and neurological impairment even six months after the treatment,1 a collection of symptoms called Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS).4 While the cause of PTLDS remains unclear and controversial, several hypotheses have been proposed to explain PTLDS, including host response to continued presence of bacterial debris,5 autoimmunity,6 co-infections,7 and presence of bacterial persisters not killed by the current Lyme antibiotics.7 Consistent with the persisting organisms not killed by current antibiotics, experiments in various animal models such as mice, dogs and monkeys have shown B. burgdorferi could still be detected after treatment with different Lyme antibiotics though viable organisms could not be cultured.8,9,10 In vitro studies also demonstrated that B. burgdorferi could develop antibiotic tolerant persisters.11 Although persister mechanisms have been reported in the model organism E. coli,12 the mechanisms of B. burgdorferi persisters remain unknown.

Here we performed RNA Sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis to determine the gene expression profile of B. burgdorferi persisters that survived antibiotic treatment to shed light on the mechanisms of B. burgdorferi persistence. B. burgdorferi B31 cultures were grown for five days to 1×107 spirochetes/mL in Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly (BSK) BSK-H medium followed by treatment with 50 µg/mL doxycycline or 50 µg/mL amoxicillin for six days. Triplicate biological samples were used for each group. The total RNA was extracted and ribosomal RNA was removed prior to preparation of cDNA (complementary DNA) libraries for Illumina sequencing. We analyzed the up-regulated and down-regulated genes in the amoxicillin and doxycycline treated B. burgdorferi persisters compared with drug free control (Figure 1). The RNA-Seq data was analyzed by BLAST analysis and mapped to Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. Real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was performed for selected candidate genes that were upregulated (bmpD and clpP) or down-regulated (gene of membrane protein BB_0428 and rpmE) to validate the RNA-Seq data (see below).

Figure 1.
Figure 1 - Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

Differentially expressed genes in doxycycline (A) and amoxicillin (B) tolerant B. burgdorferi persisters grouped into pathways. The green upward pentagons indicate upregulated genes, and the red downward pentagons indicate downregulated genes. Pathways in bold frame are differentially expressed in both doxycycline and amoxicillin tolerant persisters. Genes in bold type indicate genes that are shared in both doxycycline and amoxicillin tolerant persisters. Bb: B. burgdorferi.

Full figure and legend (442K)

For doxycycline treated B. burgdorferi persisters, a total of 675 genes were differentially expressed between doxycycline tolerant persisters and drug free group, with 335 genes upregulated and 340 genes down-regulated in doxycycline treated group. A total of 35 genes were identified by more than two-fold changes among up-regulated genes (Figure 1A), including five transporter genes (BB_0164, BB_0116, BB_0637, BB_0729 and BB_B29), four bacterial envelope protein coding genes (BB_0158, BB_A05, BB_0385 and BB_0201), three DNA repair related genes (BB_G32, BB_0552, BB_0830), two bacterial chemotaxis genes (BB_0114 and BB_0515), one bacterial secretion gene secD (BB_0652), and the clpP (BB_0757) gene encoding Clp protease. On the other hand, the majority of down-regulated (by more than two-fold) genes (33 genes) are associated with genes encoding outer membrane proteins and ribosome proteins.

clpP encoding ATP-dependent Clp protease proteolytic subunit was the most highly upregulated (30 fold) in doxycycline tolerant B. burgdorferi persisters. ClpP protease is an intracellular protease which could recognize and degrade misfolded proteins with the aid of ClpX, C or A subunits. Doxycycline could disturb bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit that might lead to misfolded proteins. The up-regulation of clpP could be a response to this situation. Meanwhile we also found some genes encoding heat shock proteins (HSP) were upregulated. The HSP molecular chaperones could stabilize proteins to ensure correct folding and help to refold damaged proteins under stress, which could be important for persister survival.

Five up-regulated transporter genes (encoding phosphotransferase system, maltose and glucose uptake transporter, Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, dicarboxylate/amino acid uptake transporter and Na/H antiporter) could facilitate uptake of nutrients (carbohydrates and amino acid) and regulate intracellular ion concentration under the pressure of doxycycline. We also found some up-regulated genes are associated with DNA repair, which may help to maintain stability of DNA under the doxycycline stress.

Cell structure proteins (envelope proteins) were biggest part of the total protein content, and inhibition of protein synthesis might cause cell envelope defect. We found most lipoproteins and outer membrane proteins were down-regulated, while the S1 and S2 antigens and some inner membrane proteins were up-regulated. The down-regulation of outer membrane lipoproteins could reduce a large demand for protein synthesis that would help B. burgdorferi persist under doxycycline stress. On the other hand, defect of outer membrane may allow strengthening of inner membrane structure by up-regulating membrane proteins. Ribosome is the target of doxycycline which inhibits protein synthesis. One persistence strategy of B. burgdorferi might be reducing the availability of drug targets. We found five ribosomal genes were down-regulated in the doxycycline treated B. burgdorferi persisters. Down-regulation of ribosome proteins may also reduce the metabolism and the demand for nutrients and energy, allowing cells to transition to persistence.

For amoxicillin tolerant B. burgdorferi peristers, a total of 516 genes were differentially expressed compared with drug free control, with 342 genes being upregulated and 174 genes down-regulated. A total of 41 up-regulated genes and 45 down-regulated genes by more than two fold change were identified (Figure 1B). The up-regulated genes could be classified into membrane protein (BB_A05, BB_A36, BB_0385, BB_0767, BB_0844), bacterial chemotaxis (BB_0414, BB_0670, BB_0567), DNA repair (BB_0422, BB_0623 or mfd, BB_0344), energy production (BB_0782 or nadD), transporter (BB_0164, BB_0729), terpenoid/steroid synthesis (BB_0686, BB_0687), virulence (BB_A24, BB_A25 and BB_0766), Clp protease (BB_0757), and P450 family dehydrogenase (BB_G17). On the other hand, the majority of the down-regulated genes belong to outer membrane proteins (most are lipoproteins), ribosome proteins and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis.

Comparison of the pathways of the doxycycline persisters and amoxicillin persisters revealed that they share several common features. For example, transporter (BB_0164, BB_0729), membrane protein (BB_A05, BB_0385), chemotaxis (BB_0414), ClpP protease (BB_0757), and DNA repair genes are up-regulated, while genes for outer membrane proteins/lipoproteins (BB_A61, BB_I39, BB_Q32) and ribosomal proteins (BB_0229) involved in protein synthesis were down-regulated. Besides these common pathways, genes for heat shock proteins and protein secretion protein were upregulated in doxycycline persisters, while amoxicillin persisters had virulence genes (dbpAB), terpenoid synthesis genes, and drug metabolism P450 family dehydrogenase gene uprgulated and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis genes down-regulated. These gene expression changes may play important roles in facilitating survival of B. burgdorferi persisters under antibiotic stress.

Amoxicillin inhibits the synthesis of bacterial cell wall and induces B. burgdorferi into round body form.13 In the amoxicillin tolerant persisters we also found many down-regulated outer membrane lipoprotein genes, which may provide a survival strategy for persisters. In addition, we found two terpenoid/steroid synthesis genes were up-regulated in amoxicillin tolerant presisters. B. burgdorferi is an unusual prokaryote that possesses sterols in its membranes.14 Up-regulation of terpenoid/steroid synthesis genes in amoxicillin tolerant persisters may increase the content of sterols, and change the cell membrane component to allow survival under amoxicillin treatment. B. burgdorferi decorin-binding proteins (Dbp) A (BB_A24) and B (BB_A25) are mainly expressed during mammalian infection to mediate bacterial attachment to the proteoglycan decorin in decorin-expressing mammal cells.15 The elevated dbpAB expression in B. burgdorferi persisters without mammalian infection by amoxicillin treatment may enhance interaction with host cell and promote pathogen persistence.

Our findings not only shed new light on the mechanisms of B. burgdorferi persisters but also have practical applications. For example, the upregulated genes identified in B. burgdorferi persisters may not only serve as targets for developing new drugs for more effective treatment but also antigens for developing diagnostic tests for persistent Lyme disease, and finally for developing therapeutic vaccines for improved treatment. Future studies are needed to address these possibilities for more effective control of Lyme disease.



  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Lyme Disease. Atlanta: CDC, 2015. Available at http://www.cec.gov/lyme/ (accessed 5 June 5 2015).
  2. Rizzoli A, Hauffe H, Carpi G, Vourc HG, Neteler M, Rosa R. Lyme borreliosis in Europe. Euro Surveill 2011; 16: pii=19906.
  3. Wormser GP, Dattwyler RJ, Shapiro ED et al. The clinical assessment, treatment, and prevention of Lyme disease, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, and babesiosis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43: 1089–1134. | Article | PubMed | ISI |
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome. Atlanta: CDC, 2015. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/lyme/postLDS/index.html. (accessed 5 June 2015)
  5. Bockenstedt LK, Gonzalez DG, Haberman AM, Belperron A. Spirochete antigens persist near cartilage after murine Lyme borreliosis therapy. J Clin Invest 2012; 122: 2652–2660. | Article | PubMed | CAS |
  6. Steere AC, Gross D, Meyer AL, Huber BT. Autoimmune mechanisms in antibiotic treatment-resistant lyme arthritis. J Autoimmun 2001; 16: 263–268. | Article | PubMed | ISI | CAS |
  7. Stricker RB. Counterpoint: long-term antibiotic therapy improves persistent symptoms associated with lyme disease. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 45: 149–157. | Article | PubMed |
  8. Barthold SW, Hodzic E, Imai DM, Feng S, Yang X, Luft BJ. Ineffectiveness of tigecycline against persistent Borrelia burgdorferi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010; 54: 643–651. | Article | PubMed |
  9. Embers ME, Barthold SW, Borda JT et al. Persistence of Borrelia burgdorferi in rhesus macaques following antibiotic treatment of disseminated infection. PLoS One 2012; 7: e29914. | Article | PubMed | CAS |
  10. Straubinger RK, Summers BA, Chang YF, Appel MJ. Persistence of Borrelia burgdorferi in experimentally infected dogs after antibiotic treatment. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 111–116. | PubMed |
  11. Feng J, Wang T, Shi W et al. Identification of Novel Activity against Borrelia burgdorferi Persisters Using an FDA Approved Drug Library. Emerg Microbes Infect 2014; 3: e49. | Article | PubMed |
  12. Zhang Y. Persisters, Persistent Infections and the Yin-Yang Model. Emerg Microbes Infect 2014; 3: e3. | Article | PubMed |
  13. Feng J, Auwaerter PG, Zhang Y. Drug Combinations against Borrelia burgdorferi Persisters In Vitro: Eradication Achieved by Using Daptomycin, Cefoperazone and Doxycycline. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0117207. | Article | PubMed |
  14. LaRocca TJ, Pathak P, Chiantia S et al. Proving lipid rafts exist: membrane domains in the prokaryote Borrelia burgdorferi have the same properties as eukaryotic lipid rafts. PLoS Pathogens 2013; 9: e1003353. | Article | PubMed |
  15. Salo J, Loimaranta V, Lahdenne P, Viljanen MK, Hytonen J. Decorin binding by DbpA and B of Borrelia garinii, Borrelia afzelii, and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu Stricto. J Infect Dis 2011; 204: 65–73. | Article | PubMed |


We thank Global Lyme Alliance (Greenwich, CT, USA) for support.

This license allows readers to copy, distribute and transmit the Contribution as long as it attributed back to the author. Readers are permitted to alter, transform or build upon the Contribution as long as the resulting work is then distributed under this is a similar license. Readers are not permitted to use the Contribution for commercial purposes. Please read the full license for further details at - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.