EMBO reports
EMBO reports
SEARCH Go
My AccountSubmit manuscriptSubscribeRegisterHelp
Journal home
Press releases
Aims and scope
Authors and referees
 Guide for authors
 Guide for referees
 Contact editors
 Advisors & Advisory
 Editorial Board
 Submit a Manuscript
Customer Services
 Subscriptions
 Order sample copy
 Purchase articles
 Reprints and
  permissions
 Contact NPG
 Advertising
EMBO
EMBO
www.embo.org

talking point
EMBO reports 8, 2, 134–135 (2007)
doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400899


Putting presenilins centre stage. Introduction to the Talking Point on the role of presenilin mutations in Alzheimer disease

John Hardy
John Hardy is at the Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Aging, Porter Neuroscience Building, National Institutes of Health Main Campus, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Tel: +1 301 451 6081;
Fax: +1 301 451 7295;
e-mail: hardyj@mail.nih.gov


Received 28 October 2006; Accepted 5 December 2006.
Genetic analysis of autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease has identified the amyloid precursor protein (APP) and the presenilins as its pathogenic loci (Rogaeva, 2002). APP is normally cleaved by gamma-secretase into the APP intracellular domain (AICD) and the 40-residue amyloid beta peptide (Abeta40) or, less frequently, the 42-residue Abeta42. Analyses of blood plasma from mutation carriers shows that all of the pathogenic mutations cause an increase in the Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio, suggesting that they alter the position of the gamma-secretase cleavage of APP (Scheuner et al, 1996; Haass & Selkoe, 1993). Gene-ablation studies and focused mutagenesis experiments by De Strooper, Wolfe and their colleagues (De Strooper et al, 1998; Wolfe et al, 1999) shows that the presenilins—along with other accessory proteins (Edbauer et al, 2003)—form the gamma-secretase complex. This work is a good example of how genetic analysis can give direct mechanistic insight into the pathogenesis of an important disease. In the Talking Point in this issue of EMBO reports, De Strooper and Wolfe separately outline their views concerning the precise molecular details of the gamma-secretase cleavage reaction and discuss the ways in which mutations might affect this process (De Strooper, 2007; Wolfe, 2007). In many ways, these papers make it clear how much we have learned about gamma-secretase and intramembranous cleavage in general. In addition, they also clearly delineate what we do not know, and this clarity about the 'known unknowns' makes the articles particularly useful.

We do not know what these mutations do to the cleavage reaction. A consensus seems to be emerging that the mutant presenilins lead to slower acting gamma-secretase, although why this should result in more Abeta42 and less Abeta40 is not clear; Wolfe and De Strooper discuss some alternatives. It is important to remember that their arguments concern the effect of mutations on the rate of cleavage per molecule of gamma-secretase rather than the overall rate; clearly, presenilin hemizygosity would reduce the overall rate of cleavage but would not affect the rate of cleavage per molecule of gamma-secretase. Understandable confusion over this important distinction has perhaps led to some of the controversy about the precise effects of the mutations (Fig 1). A full understanding of the effects of the mutations on the cleavage reaction awaits the difficult task of obtaining a high-resolution image of wild-type and mutant gamma-secretase. Some limited progress has been made towards achieving this goal (Lazarov et al, 2006). gamma-secretase cleavage has turned out to be considerably more complex than predicted, with the discovery of a multi-cut mechanism and many other important substrates besides APP, including Notch (Levitan & Greenwald, 1995). It is clear that detailed understanding of the mechanism of the gamma-secretase cleavage reaction will be important for cell biology in general, as well as for deciding exactly what strategy to take in modulating gamma-secretase as a therapeutic target. One important gap in our knowledge concerns the molecular effects of presenilin mutations on, for example, Notch metabolism: do the mutations alter the cleavage site in the same way as they alter APP cleavage? This question is important both for our understanding of the basic biology of the process and for therapeutic reasons; however, we do not yet have the molecular tools to provide an answer. If they do alter the processing of Notch—and other substrates—is this important for Alzheimer pathogenesis, as some have suggested (Beglopoulos & Shen, 2006; Sambamurti et al, 2006)?

Figure 1
Figure 1
Presenilin mutations linked to Alzheimer disease.An updated view of presenilin 1 mutations showing reported mutations in red and the corrected nine-transmembrane structure described by Spasic et al (2006). C-TF, carboxy-terminal fragment; N-TF, amino-terminal fragment. Drawing by R. Crook.
We have certainly come a long way in our quest to understand Alzheimer pathogenesis and this mission has yielded revelatory knowledge of regulated intramembranous cleavage. However, as with all genuine advances, more questions have been raised than answered. The articles by Wolfe and De Strooper constitute a high-level debate and update of these issues.





References

Beglopoulos V, Shen J (2006) Regulation of CRE-dependent transcription by presenilins: prospects for therapy of Alzheimer's disease. Trends Pharmacol Sci 27: 33–40 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

De Strooper B (2007) Loss of function presenilin mutations in Alzheimer disease. EMBO reports 8: 141–146 | Article |

De Strooper B, Saftig P, Craessaerts K, Vanderstichele H, Guhde G, Annaert W, Von Figura K, Van Leuven F (1998) Deficiency of presenilin-1 inhibits the normal cleavage of amyloid precursor protein. Nature 391: 387–390 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Edbauer D, Winkler E, Regula JT, Pesold B, Steiner H, Haass C (2003) Reconstitution of gamma-secretase activity. Nat Cell Biol 5: 486–488 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Haass C, Selkoe DJ (1993) Cellular processing of beta-amyloid precursor protein and the genesis of amyloid beta-peptide. Cell 75: 1039–1042 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Lazarov VK, Fraering PC, Ye W, Wolfe MS, Selkoe DJ (2006) Electron microscopic structure of a purified active gamma secretase reveals an aqueous intramembranous chamber and two pores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 16889–16894

Levitan D, Greenwald I (1995) Facilitation of lin-12-mediated signalling by sel-12, a Caenorhabditis elegans S182 Alzheimer's disease gene. Nature 377: 351–354 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Rogaeva E (2002) The solved and unsolved mysteries of the genetics of early-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neuromolecular Med 2: 1–10 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

Sambamurti K, Suram A, Venugopal C, Prakasam A, Zhou Y, Lahiri DK, Greig NH (2006) A partial failure of membrane protein turnover may cause Alzheimer's disease: a new hypothesis. Curr Alzheimer Res 3: 81–90 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

Scheuner D et al (1996) Secreted amyloid beta-protein similar to that in the senile plaques of Alzheimer's disease is increased in vivo by the presenilin 1 and 2 and APP mutations linked to familial Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med 2: 864–870 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Spasic D, Tolia A, Dillen K, Baert V, De Strooper B, Vrijens S, Annaert W (2006) Presenilin-1 maintains a nine-transmembrane topology throughout the secretory pathway. J Biol Chem 281: 26569–26577 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

Wolfe MS (2007) When loss is gain: reduced presenilin proteolytic function leads to increased Abeta42/Abeta40. EMBO reports 8: 136–140 | Article |

Wolfe MS, Xia W, Ostaszewski BL, Diehl TS, Kimberly WT, Selkoe DJ (1999) Two transmembrane aspartates in presenilin-1 required for presenilin endoproteolysis and gamma-secretase activity. Nature 398: 513–517 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

top go to top
This article

Email
Email link to a friend
Download PDF Download PDF
 rights and permissions Rights and permissions
 order commercial reprints Reprints
 More articles like this

References

Figures & tables

Next article

Previous article
Privacy PolicyCopyright © 2007 by the European Molecular Biology Organization