Figure 1

The interaction network of the chaperonin CCT

Carien Dekker, Peter C Stirling, Elizabeth A McCormack, Heather Filmore, Angela Paul, Renee L Brost, Michael Costanzo, Charles Boone, Michel R Leroux and Keith R Willison

  • The EMBO Journal (2008) 27, 1827 - 1839
  • doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.108

Published online: 29 May 2008

Back to article
Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, or to obtain a text description, please contact npg@nature.com

Isolation of CCT substrate complexes. (A) Affinity purification of CCT–3CBP and CCT–6CBP on calmodulin resin. CaM-resin-purified CCT was analysed by 10% SDS–PAGE. (Lane I) CCT–3CBP complex: the eight CCT subunits migrating around the 60 kDa marker are indicated by the square bracket. (Lane II) CCT–6CBP complex: subunit Cct6p migrating at 70 kDa as a consequence of the inserted tag is indicated by an arrow. (Lane III) CCT–6CBP complex as used for in-house MALDI-MS and PMF-MS analysis. Molecular weight markers in kilodaltons are indicated on the left, Vid27p and actin are indicated as a reference (see also Supplementary Table S1). (B) Purification of CCT–3CBP in the presence and absence of ATP. CCT was incubated plusminus5 mM ATP at room temperature during the CaM affinity purification procedure. EDTA eluates of CCT were applied to 10–40% sucrose gradients. The panels +ATP wash and -ATP wash show four adjacent sucrose gradient fractions from each 20S CCT peak electrophoresed on 10% SDS gels followed by Coomassie (fractions 1–4) or silver staining (fraction 2 from each peak). (C) Histograms of the CCT–3CBP-bound polypeptides plotted against their MudPIT score (Tables I). Comparisons between the ATP-treated (red bars) and untreated CCT samples (gray bars) show the proteins that are removed by 5 mM ATP treatment during the CaM chromatography step.

Back to article