Article

  • The EMBO Journal (2007) 26, 1579 - 1590
  • doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601612

Published online: 1 March 2007

A sigma-core interaction of the RNA polymerase holoenzyme that enhances promoter escape

Mark Leibman1 and Ann Hochschild1

  1. Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Correspondence to:

Ann Hochschild, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Ave., D1, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Tel.: +1 617 432 1986; Fax: +1 617 738 7664; E-mail: ahochschild@hms.harvard.edu

Received 2 October 2006; Accepted 24 January 2007


The sigma subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) is required for promoter-specific transcription initiation and can also participate in downstream events. Several functionally important intersubunit interactions between Escherichia coli sigma70 and the core enzyme (alpha2betabeta'omega) have been defined. These include an interaction between conserved region 2 of sigma70 (sigma2) and the coiled-coil domain of beta' (beta' coiled-coil) that is required for sequence-specific interaction between sigma2 and the DNA during both promoter open complex formation and sigma70-dependent early elongation pausing. Here, we describe a previously uncharacterized interaction between a region of sigma70 adjacent to sigma2 called the nonconserved region (sigma70 NCR) and a region in the N-terminal portion of beta' that appears to functionally antagonize the sigma2/beta' coiled-coil interaction. Specifically, we show that the sigma70 NCR/beta' interaction facilitates promoter escape and hinders early elongation pausing, in contrast to the sigma2/beta' coiled-coil interaction, which has opposite effects. We also demonstrate that removal of the sigma70 NCR results in a severe growth defect; we suggest that its importance for growth may reflect its role in promoter escape.


  • Keywords:

    • promoter escape,
    • RNA polymerase,
    • transcription pausing,
    • lambdaQ,
    • sigma70

Introduction

Top

Multisubunit DNA-dependent RNA polymerases are structurally conserved throughout all domains of life (Ebright, 2000). The bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) core enzyme (subunit composition alpha2betabeta'omega) is catalytically active for RNA chain elongation during transcription. However, to recognize promoter sequences and initiate transcription, the core enzyme must associate with a sigma factor, forming the RNAP holoenzyme (Gross et al, 1998). The primary sigma factor of Escherichia coli, sigma70, directs transcription from promoters typically defined by two conserved sequence elements, the -10 and -35 elements that are separated by approx17 base pairs (bp) (Gross et al, 1998). All primary sigma factors share four regions of conserved sequence (regions 1–4) that are connected by intervening sequences of variable size (Lonetto et al, 1992), and regions 2 and 4 contain DNA-binding domains that recognize the -10 and -35 elements, respectively (Murakami and Darst, 2003). At least two other regions of sigma (regions 1.2 and 3.0) can make sequence-dependent contact with auxiliary promoter elements (Bown et al, 1997; Feklistov et al, 2006; Haugen et al, 2006).

The transcription process can be divided into a number of distinct steps (deHaseth et al, 1998). First, the RNAP holoenzyme binds to duplex promoter DNA to form the closed RNAP–promoter complex. Next, a series of conformational changes leads to the formation of the initiation-competent open complex in which the DNA is locally melted (between -11 and +1) to expose the transcription start site. RNAP can then initiate transcription, typically synthesizing short abortive RNA products that are repetitively released and resynthesized before RNAP breaks its contacts with the promoter and escapes into productive elongation (Hsu, 2002). During the course of elongation, the transcription complex may encounter pause sites and potential arrest sites at which the nascent RNA remains stably bound to the enzyme (Artsimovitch and Landick, 2000). Finally, upon reaching a termination site, RNAP releases the RNA transcript and dissociates from the DNA.

In the context of the RNAP holoenzyme, sigma70 forms extensive contacts with the core enzyme that involve each of the four conserved regions of sigma70 (Sharp et al, 1999; Murakami et al, 2002; Vassylyev et al, 2002), including regions 2 and 4, which contact the coiled-coil domain of the beta' subunit (Arthur and Burgess, 1998; Young et al, 2001) and the flexible flap domain of the beta subunit (Kuznedelov et al, 2002; Geszvain et al, 2004; Nickels et al, 2005), respectively. Both of these interactions have important implications for the functional properties of the holoenzyme at multiple stages of the transcription cycle. The interaction between sigma70 region 2 (sigma2) and the beta' coiled-coil, in particular, which is essential for holoenzyme formation, is also required for functional interaction between sigma70 and the promoter -10 element, allowing sigma2 to make sequence-specific contacts with bases of the nontemplate strand in the context of the open promoter complex (Marr and Roberts, 1997; Young et al, 2001).

sigma70 can also play functional roles during the elongation phase of transcription (Mooney et al, 2005). The most well-characterized example involves the regulation of late gene transcription from the bacteriophage lambda promoter PR', where sigma70 mediates an early elongation pause that is essential for the function of the Q antiterminator protein (lambdaQ), a regulator of late gene expression that enables RNAP to read through specific transcription terminators located within the late gene operon (Roberts et al, 1998) (Figure 1A). Although lambdaQ induces terminator readthrough as a stable component of the transcription elongation complex (Deighan and Hochschild, 2007), it must first engage the RNAP holoenzyme during the early elongation pause to gain access to the elongation complex (Roberts et al, 1998). This engagement process depends on two DNA sequence elements, a Q binding element (QBE) that is located between the PR' -10 and -35 elements (Yarnell and Roberts, 1992) and a pause-inducing element that is located in the initial transcribed region (Ring et al, 1996) (Figure 1A). The requirements of the engagement process—that DNA-bound lambdaQ interacts with the paused elongation complex—ensure that lambdaQ specifically targets late gene transcription complexes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1 :

The sigma70 L402F substitution impairs lambdaQ-mediated antitermination in vivo. (A) Presence of lambdaQ allows RNAP that has initiated from PR' to read through transcription terminator tR'. Blow-up depicts functionally important elements at PR', including the promoter -10 and -35 elements, the QBE, and the pause-inducing -10-like element. (B) Effect of substitution L402F in chromosomally encoded sigma70 on lambdaQ-dependent lacZ expression from a PR'-lacZ reporter in vivo. beta-Galactosidase assays were performed to quantify lacZ expression levels in BN174 (WT) or ML9 (L402F) cells containing either a plasmid that directed the synthesis of lambdaQ under the control of an IPTG-inducible promoter or a control plasmid that did not encode lambdaQ. Note that the basal level of lacZ expression is approx2-fold higher in ML9 cells. Inset shows 'fold effect of lambdaQ' values for cells grown in the presence of 100 muM IPTG; these values were determined by dividing the beta-galactosidase activity in the presence of lambdaQ by the beta-galactosidase activity in the absence of lambdaQ. Shown are the averages of three independent sets of measurements (and standard deviations).

View full figure (57 KB)

The PR' pause-inducing element resembles a promoter -10 element and pausing, which manifests itself in complexes containing nascent RNAs of 16 or 17 nucleotides (nt), is mediated by a protein–DNA interaction between sigma2 and the nontemplate strand of the -10-like element (Ring et al, 1996). Moreover, as during open complex formation, establishment of sequence-specific contacts between sigma2 and the -10-like pause element depends on the interaction between sigma2 and the beta' coiled-coil. Thus, sigma70 substitutions that weaken the sigma2/beta' coiled-coil interaction (including sigma70 substitution L402F) reduce pausing at PR', resulting in impaired lambdaQ antitermination function both in vitro and in vivo (Ko et al, 1998; Sharp et al, 1999). These sigma70 substitutions also destabilize open complexes (Ko et al, 1998), increasing promoter escape (Chan and Gross, 2001).

Here, we describe the results of a genetic screen for sigma70 mutations that suppress the PR' pause defect caused by sigma70 substitution L402F. Designed to further probe the sigma2/beta' coiled-coil interface, this screen unexpectedly uncovered amino-acid substitutions in the nonconserved region (NCR) of sigma70, a region located between conserved regions 1.2 and 2.1 that we show to be important for cell growth. The analysis of these substitutions led to the identification of a previously uncharacterized interaction between the sigma70 NCR and a region of beta' located near its N-terminus. We show that this interaction inhibits sigma70-dependent pausing during early elongation and also facilitates promoter escape. In contrast, the sigma2/beta' coiled-coil interaction is required for sigma70-dependent pausing (Ko et al, 1998) and impedes promoter escape (Chan and Gross, 2001). Our results suggest that the interaction between the sigma70 NCR and the beta' N-terminal region may functionally antagonize the sigma2/beta' coiled-coil interaction during specific stages of the transcription cycle. Furthermore, our finding that the sigma70 NCR/beta' interaction facilitates promoter escape suggests a possible explanation for the important role of the sigma70 NCR in vivo.

Substitutions in the sigma70 NCR that promote lambdaQ-mediated antitermination

As a strategy to functionally probe the sigma70–core interface, we performed a genetic screen to identify second-site substitutions in sigma70 that restore the ability of RNAP containing sigma70 L402F (Esigma70 L402F) to engage the promoter-proximal pause site at lambdaPR'. We designed this screen by taking advantage of the fact that the pause defect of Esigma70 L402F manifests itself as a defect in lambdaQ-mediated antitermination both in vitro and in vivo (Ko et al, 1998). To assay lambdaQ antitermination function at PR'in vivo, we used a PR'-lacZ fusion, encompassing PR' sequence from -109 to +232, which includes terminator tR' (Figure 1A) (Nickels et al, 2002). The level of lacZ expression from this construct reports on the ability of plasmid-encoded lambdaQ to function as an antiterminator for transcripts initiating from PR'. We introduced the PR'-lacZ reporter in single copy on an F' episome into a strain containing the L402F mutation in the rpoD gene (encoding sigma70) or an otherwise isogenic strain containing wild-type (WT) rpoD. Plasmids directing the synthesis of lambdaQ or no lambdaQ under the control of an isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG)-inducible promoter were introduced into these reporter strains. At maximal induction, lambdaQ increased expression from the test promoter approx16-fold in cells containing sigma70 WT (strain BN174) and only approx5 fold in cells containing sigma70 L402F (strain ML9) (Figure 1B). Western blotting revealed similar levels of lambdaQ in the two strains (data not shown).

To identify second-site substitutions in sigma70 that suppress the effect of the L402F substitution on early elongation pausing at PR', we used error-prone PCR to introduce random mutations into the complete sigma70 coding sequence present on plasmid pBRsigma70 L402F, which directs the synthesis of sigma70 L402F. The resulting expression libraries encoding sigma70 L402F with other random substitutions were introduced into reporter strain cells bearing the L402F mutation in rpoD and already containing lambdaQ (see Materials and methods). Clones expressing lacZ at increased levels were identified on indicator medium and the sigma70-encoding plasmids were isolated and their effects on lacZ transcription reconfirmed. A total of 17 suppressor substitutions at 15 amino-acid positions were uncovered that increased lacZ transcription specifically in the presence of lambdaQ (Figure 2). Western blotting indicated that in general these second-site substitutions did not enhance lacZ expression by causing increases in lambdaQ protein levels; the only exception was substitution A370V, which caused the lambdaQ protein level to increase by approx50–100% (data not shown). Surprisingly, the screen did not yield any new substitutions in sigma2, although true revertants and other substitutions were frequently observed at residue 402. Rather, all of the second-site substitutions isolated in the screen mapped to the sigma70 NCR, a domain located between conserved regions 1.2 and 2.1 that varies in both length and sequence among primary sigma factors (Lonetto et al, 1992). We located the amino-acid residues affected by the suppressor mutations in a crystal structure of a sigma70 fragment extending from region 1.2 to 2.4 (Malhotra et al, 1996). The substitutions affecting surface-exposed residues (R281C, E284K, R285H, K299E, F306S, K359E, I367F, A370V, and K371E), which define a semicontinuous surface (Figure 3), were selected for further study; we note that five of these nine residues are positively charged.

Figure 2.

Figure 2 :

Substitutions in the sigma70 NCR suppress the defect in lambdaQ-mediated antitermination caused by the L402F substitution in sigma70. ML9 cells encoding sigma70 L402F at the chromosomal rpoD locus and harboring the PR'-lacZ fusion on an F' episome were cotransformed with compatible plasmids directing the synthesis of the indicated sigma70 protein and directing the synthesis of either lambdaQ or no lambdaQ. Cells were grown in the presence of 100 muM IPTG and assayed for beta-galactosidase activity. 'Fold effect of lambdaQ' values were calculated as described for Figure 1. Shown are the averages of three independent sets of measurements (and standard deviations).

View full figure (66 KB)

Figure 3.

Figure 3 :

Substitutions in the sigma70 NCR form a semicontinuous surface. Top: linear representation of the crystallized sigma70 fragment, with conserved regions color-coded. Bottom: sigma70 fragment structure, with conserved regions colored as above (adapted from Malhotra et al, 1996). The NCR is shown in gray and residues identified by suppressor substitutions are colored violet and labeled.

View full figure (96 KB)

To confirm that the effects of the sigma70 substitutions on transcription from PR' are specific to the antitermination function of lambdaQ, we examined PR' transcription in vitro in the presence of lambdaQ. After purifying the WT and mutant sigma70 proteins, we assayed lambdaQ function in the presence of the corresponding reconstituted holoenzymes by performing single-round transcription assays using a PR' template containing terminator tR'. When lambdaQ is present, it modifies RNAP so that it can read through the terminator, producing a full-length run-off transcript. Therefore, the percentage of full-length transcripts (% readthrough) is a measure of lambdaQ function. Under our conditions, 33 and 5.5% readthrough values were observed for Esigma70 WT and Esigma70 L402F, respectively, in the presence of lambdaQ. We found that eight out of nine of the suppressor substitutions partially restored readthrough (to between 9 and 19%; data not shown) when tested in the context of Esigma70 L402F. The only exception was substitution A370V, which did not increase terminator readthrough above the experimental error; nevertheless, this substitution had effects on other functional properties of RNAP that were similar to those of the other substitutions (see below). None of the substitutions significantly increased the intrinsic ability of RNAP to read through tR' in the absence of lambdaQ (data not shown).

Substitutions in the sigma70 NCR enhance promoter-proximal pausing in vitro

To determine whether the substitutions in the sigma70 NCR, like the L402F substitution, affect lambdaQ antitermination function indirectly by affecting promoter-proximal pausing, we performed in vitro transcription time courses under single-round conditions using a lambda PR' template, monitoring the RNA content of each reaction at various time points after the initiation of transcription. As observed previously (Grayhack et al, 1985; Yarnell and Roberts, 1992; Ko et al, 1998), the 16- and 17-nt RNA species appeared early in the time course and decayed over time, whereas the full-length transcript accumulated throughout the time course (Figure 4A, left panel). Furthermore, as expected, the L402F substitution in sigma70 caused a marked reduction in the 16- and 17-nt pause species (Figure 4A, left panel) (Ko et al, 1998).

Figure 4.

Figure 4 :

Substitutions in the sigma70 NCR enhance pausing at lambdaPR' and at placUV5. (A) Single-round in vitro transcription time-course assays using a PR' template (left and middle panels) or a placUV5 template (right panel) and RNAP reconstituted with the indicated sigma70 proteins. Aliquots of single reactions were removed and stopped at the indicated time points after transcription was initiated. The RNA was labeled internally with [alpha-32P]UTP (middle and right panels) or end-labeled with [gamma-32P]ATP (left panel). +16 and +17, 16- and 17-nt RNA species, respectively, produced from the lambdaPR' template; T, 194-nt terminated transcript produced from the lambdaPR' template; +17 and +18, 17- and 18-nt RNA species, respectively, produced from the placUV5 template; RO, 96-nt runoff transcript produced from the placUV5 template. A faint 18-nt RNA species was also observed during time courses with the lambdaPR' template when the RNA was internally labeled. This is likely the result of nucleotide deprivation at U19 under conditions where the UTP concentration was reduced to improve incorporation of [alpha-32P]UTP, and has been observed previously under similar reaction conditions (Ko et al, 1998). (B, C) Effects of substitutions on pause capture and pause half-life. The percentage of elongation complexes paused (100 (16-nt+17-nt)/(16-nt+17-nt+T) or 100 (17-nt+18-nt)/(17-nt+18-nt+T)) was approximated at each time point, plotted, and fit to the exponential equation Y=Y0e-kt (Supplementary Figure S1). Exponential equations were solved to obtain pause capture (left panels) and half-life (right panels) values for each holoenzyme. Pause capture was approximated by extrapolating the equations to t=0. Error bars represent standard deviations from at least three separate experiments. In cases where error bars are not shown, the mutants were assayed twice, with similar results.

View full figure (155 KB)

Compared to Esigma70 L402F, RNAP holoenzymes reconstituted with each of the double mutant sigma70 proteins produced a relative increase in the amount of 16- and 17-nt RNA species (Figure 4A, middle panel, and Supplementary Figure S1). To quantify the effects of the suppressor substitutions on pausing, we calculated pause capture (i.e. the percentage of transcription complexes that functionally engage the pause element) and pause half-life (Ko et al, 1998) (see legend of Figure 4). Under our experimental conditions, we calculated pause capture values of 71 and 5.4% for Esigma70 WT and Esigma70 L402F, respectively. The pause capture values for RNAPs reconstituted with the double mutant sigma70 proteins ranged from 9% for Esigma70 A370V/L402F to 54% for Esigma70 K299E/L402F (Figure 4B and Supplementary Figure S1). In contrast to the effects on pause capture, we did not detect significant effects of the suppressor substitutions on pause half-life (Figure 4B and Supplementary Figure S1). We conclude, therefore, that the sigma70 NCR suppressor substitutions enhance lambdaQ antitermination function by increasing the percentage of RNAP holoenzymes that functionally engage the pause element during early elongation at lambdaPR'.

The suppressor substitutions also enhanced pausing at lambdaPR' in the context of otherwise WT sigma70, but these effects were more subtle (data not shown), presumably because the pause capture for Esigma70 WT is already quite high. To determine whether the suppressor substitutions could produce significant effects on sigma70-dependent promoter-proximal pausing even in the context of WT sigma70, we took advantage of a promoter (placUV5) that contains a promoter-proximal pause element that functions less efficiently than that of PR' (Nickels et al, 2004). We assayed transcription in vitro from a placUV5 template using Esigma70 WT and Esigma70 K299E (Figure 4A, right panel) and found that substitution K299E increased both pause capture (from 28 to 50%) and pause half-life (approx2-fold) (Figure 4C and Supplementary Figure S1). In addition, we found that substitution K299E increased utilization of the plac pause element in vivo (Supplementary Figure S1). We conclude that the sigma70 NCR suppressor substitutions enhance sigma70-dependent early elongation pausing both in the presence and absence of substitution L402F.

Substitutions in the sigma70 NCR disrupt an interaction with the beta' subunit

Because the L402F substitution specifically weakens the interaction between sigma2 and the beta' coiled-coil, we sought to determine whether the substitutions in the sigma70 NCR restore early elongation pausing by strengthening the sigma2/beta' coiled-coil interaction. To do this, we employed a transcription-based bacterial two-hybrid assay (Dove et al, 1997; Dove and Hochschild, 2004). In this assay, interaction between a protein domain X fused to a subunit of RNAP and a partner domain Y fused to a DNA-binding protein activates transcription from a test promoter bearing a recognition site for the DNA-binding protein in the upstream region. This two-hybrid assay enabled us to detect an interaction between sigma70 residues 94–448 (specifying the structurally characterized sigma70 fragment comprising region 1.2, the NCR, and region 2) (Malhotra et al, 1996) and beta' residues 262–309 (specifying the coiled coil) (Young et al, 2001). Specifically, the sigma70 fragment was fused to the CI protein of bacteriophage lambda (lambdaCI) and the beta' coiled-coil fragment was fused to the N-terminal domain of the RNAP alpha subunit in place of its C-terminal domain (Figure 5A). Introduction of plasmids encoding these two fusion proteins into strain FW102 F'OL2–62, which bears test promoter placOL2–62 linked to a lacZ reporter gene, results in the activation of lacZ transcription (up to approx13-fold) (Figure 5B). As expected, introduction of the L402F substitution into the sigma70 moiety of the lambdaCI-sigma70 fusion protein weakened this interaction substantially (Figure 5C). However, the interaction was neither weakened nor significantly strengthened by any of the suppressor substitutions (which were individually introduced into the otherwise WT sigma70 moiety) (Figure 5C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5 :

Substitutions in the sigma70 NCR specifically disrupt an interaction with beta' 55–261. (A) Schematic of bacterial two-hybrid assay used to detect protein–protein interactions between fragments of sigma70 and beta'. (B) lambdaCI-sigma70 94–448 activates transcription from the test promoter in cells containing the alphabeta' 262–309 fusion protein. Strain FW102 F'OL2–62 cells containing compatible plasmids directing the synthesis of the indicated proteins were grown in the presence of the indicated concentrations of IPTG and assayed for beta-galactosidase activity. (C) Effects of substitutions in the sigma70 NCR on the interaction between the sigma moiety of the lambdaCI-sigma70 94–448 fusion protein and the beta' moiety of the alphabeta' 262–309 fusion protein. Cells were grown in the presence of 10 muM IPTG and assayed for beta-galactosidase activity. (D) lambdaCI-sigma70 94–448 activates transcription from the test promoter in cells containing the alphabeta' 55–261 fusion protein. Strain FW102 F'OL2–62 cells containing compatible plasmids directing the synthesis of the indicated proteins were grown in the presence of the indicated concentrations of IPTG and assayed for beta-galactosidase activity. (E) Effects of substitutions in the sigma70 NCR on the interaction between the sigma moiety of the lambdaCI-sigma70 94–448 fusion protein and the beta' moiety of the alphabeta' 55–261 fusion protein. Cells were grown in the presence of 20 muM IPTG and assayed for beta-galactosidase activity. (C, E) Assays were performed three times in duplicate on separate occasions; shown are the average values from all trials with standard deviations.

View full figure (138 KB)

Using the two-hybrid assay, we also detected an interaction between the same sigma70 (94–448) fragment and a more N-terminal region of beta', present within a fragment extending from residue 55 to 261 (Figure 5D). In contrast to the sigma70/beta' coiled-coil interaction, this second interaction was unaffected by the sigma70 L402F substitution, but was disrupted by all but one (A370V) of the suppressor substitutions (Figure 5E). That the substitutions in the sigma70 NCR did not affect the sigma70/beta' coiled-coil interaction suggests that their disruptive effects on the sigma70/beta' 55–261 interaction are specific and not the result of defects in the synthesis, stability, or folding of the mutant lambdaCI-sigma70 fusion proteins.

We conclude from the results of these two-hybrid assays that the substitutions in the sigma70 NCR isolated in our genetic screen specifically weaken an interaction with a region of beta' contained within the 55–261 fragment that we call the sigma NCR interaction domain (SNCRID). Furthermore, our results suggest that, in contrast to the interaction between sigma2 and the beta' coiled-coil, the interaction between the sigma70 NCR and the beta' SNCRID inhibits early elongation pausing (because substitutions that disrupt the interaction enhance pausing). Consistent with this idea, we found that strengthening the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction decreased early elongation pausing (Supplementary Figure S2).

The results of a previous study revealed that the sigma70 NCR is not required for transcription in vitro, at least from some promoters, but raised the possibility that it is essential for viability (Kumar et al, 1995). We sought to revisit this issue by replacing the sigma70 NCR with a seven-residue linker that connects conserved regions 1.2 and 2.1 in the stationary phase sigma factor sigma38 (see Supplementary Results). We found that although this chimeric sigma factor was stably produced, cells containing the chimera in the absence of WT sigma70 were severely compromised for growth (Supplementary Figure S3).

Substitutions in the beta' subunit that enhance early elongation pausing

The hypothesis that an interaction between the sigma70 NCR and the beta' SNCRID inhibits sigma70-dependent early elongation pausing suggests that it should be possible to isolate substitutions on the interacting surface of beta' that disrupt its interaction with the sigma70 NCR and enhance early elongation pausing. To identify such substitutions, we screened for beta' mutants that enhanced lambdaQ-mediated antitermination in cells containing the L402F mutation in rpoD. After random PCR mutagenesis of a fragment encoding beta' residues 1–258 (present on plasmid pBRbeta'), we identified eight substitutions at five amino-acid positions (E148, E162, E170, E171, and E175—all negatively charged residues) that suppressed the defect in lambdaQ-mediated antitermination caused by sigma70 substitution L402F. At maximal induction, lambdaQ stimulated lacZ transcription from the lambdaPR'-lacZ test promoter 8.2- to 9.7-fold in ML9 (rpoD L402F) cells directing the synthesis of the mutant beta' proteins from pBRbeta', compared with only 4.8-fold in ML9 cells directing the synthesis of WT beta' from pBRbeta' (Figure 6A).

Figure 6.

Figure 6 :

Substitutions in beta' suppress the defect in lambdaQ-mediated antitermination caused by the sigma70 L402F substitution and weaken the interaction between the beta' SNCRID and the sigma70 NCR. (A) Cells encoding either sigma70 L402F or WT sigma70 at the chromosomal rpoD locus and harboring the PR'-lacZ fusion on an F' episome were cotransformed with compatible plasmids, one directing the synthesis of the indicated beta' protein (in addition to chromosomally encoded WT beta') and the other directing the synthesis of either lambdaQ or no lambdaQ. Cells were grown in the presence of 100 muM IPTG and assayed for beta-galactosidase activity. 'Fold effect of lambdaQ' values were calculated as described for Figure 1. Shown are the averages of three independent sets of measurements (and standard deviations). (B) Effects of substitutions in the beta'SNCRID on the interaction between the beta' moiety of the alphabeta'55–261 fusion protein and the sigma moiety of the lambdaCI-sigma70 94–448 fusion protein. Strain FW102 F'OL2–62 cells containing compatible plasmids directing the synthesis of the lambdaCI-sigma70 fusion protein and either alpha or the indicated alphabeta' fusion protein were grown in the presence of 20 muM IPTG and assayed for beta-galactosidase activity. Assays were performed three times in duplicate on separate occasions; shown are the average values from all trials with standard deviations.

View full figure (54 KB)

To determine whether these beta' substitutions affect the interaction between the beta' SNCRID and the sigma70 NCR, we again used the two-hybrid assay. After introducing mutations encoding substitutions E148K, E162K, E170K, E171K, and E175K into plasmid pBRalpha-beta' 55–261, we transformed FW102 F'OL2–62 cells with pAClambdaCI-sigma70 94–448 together with pBRalpha-beta' 55–261 and the mutant variants. Each of the beta' substitutions reduced or nearly abolished the stimulatory effect of the lambdaCI-sigma70 fusion protein on lacZ transcription (Figure 6B). Western blotting confirmed that these substitutions did not affect alphabeta' 55–261 protein levels (data not shown). Thus, these beta' substitutions, like those on the putative partner surface of the sigma70 NCR, weaken the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction and enhance lambdaQ function in vivo.

To confirm that the effects of the beta' substitutions on transcription from PR', like those of the sigma70 NCR substitutions, are specific to the antitermination function of lambdaQ, we examined transcription from PR'in vitro in the presence of lambdaQ. RNAP core enzymes containing beta'-His6(WT), beta'-His6(E148K), beta'-His6(E171K), and beta'-His6(E175K) were purified (see Materials and methods) and used to reconstitute holoenzymes with sigma70 L402F. The beta' substitutions E148K, E171K, and E175K increased terminator readthrough in the presence of lambdaQ protein to 13, 10, and 24%, respectively, compared with a 5.5% readthrough for RNAP containing WT beta' (data not shown).

To determine whether the effects of the beta' substitutions on lambdaQ function were caused by enhanced pausing, we performed single-round in vitro transcription time-course assays with Esigma70 L402F, E[beta' E148K]sigma70 L402F, and E[beta' E175K]sigma70 L402F (Figure 7A and Supplementary Figure S1). Both these beta' substitutions increased pause capture significantly, with values of 19 and 71% for E[beta' E148K]sigma70 L402F and E[beta' E175K]sigma70 L402F, respectively, compared with 5.4% for Esigma70 L402F (Figure 7B). Thus, substitutions in beta' that weaken the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction, like those in the sigma70 NCR, enhance early elongation pausing. These results provide strong support for the hypothesis that the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction inhibits early elongation pausing at lambdaPR'.

Figure 7.

Figure 7 :

Substitutions in the beta' SNCRID enhance pausing at lambdaPR'. (A) Single-round in vitro transcription time-course assays using a PR' template and RNAP containing the indicated beta' and sigma70 proteins. +16 and +17, 16- and 17-nt RNA species, respectively, produced from the lambdaPR' template; T, 194-nt terminated transcript produced from the lambdaPR' template. (B) Effects of substitutions on pause capture and pause half-life (calculated from plots shown in Supplementary Figure S1). Error bars represent standard deviations from at least three separate experiments. All data were obtained and analyzed as described for Figure 4.

View full figure (82 KB)

Weakening the interaction between the sigma70 NCR and the beta' SNCRID increases abortive RNA synthesis

While examining the effects of the sigma70 NCR and beta' SNCRID substitutions on early elongation pausing by means of in vitro transcription assays, we noticed that the RNAP holoenzymes containing sigma70 L402F with one of the suppressor substitutions in either sigma70 or beta' synthesized significantly more 11-, 12-, and 13-nt abortive RNAs than Esigma70 L402F (Figures 4A and 7A). Note that the synthesis of these abortive transcripts was reduced by substitution L402F, consistent with previous observations with this and other sigma70 substitutions that weaken the interaction between sigma2 and the beta' coiled-coil (Ko et al, 1998; Chan and Gross, 2001). To quantify the effects of the sigma70 NCR and beta' SNCRID substitutions on abortive RNA synthesis, we performed single-round in vitro transcription reactions under conditions (see Materials and methods) that permitted us to calculate abortive probabilities (defined as the number of transcripts of a given size divided by the total number of transcripts equal or greater in size) (Hsu, 1996) for the detectable abortive RNA products (8, 9, 11, 12, and 13 nt in length). Figure 8A and B shows that the sigma70 L402F substitution reduced the abortive probabilities at +11, +12, and +13 (but not at +8 and +9), consistent with the results of previous studies of abortive initiation on the N25 anti promoter (Chan and Gross, 2001). The sigma70 suppressor substitutions (assayed in the context of sigma70 L402F) significantly increased the abortive probabilities at +11, +12, and +13, but not at +8 and +9 (Figure 8A and B). Similarly, the beta' suppressor substitutions (beta' E148K and beta' E175K) increased the abortive probabilities at +11, +12, and +13 without affecting the abortive probabilities at +8 and +9 (Figure 8C and D). Therefore, we conclude that weakening the interaction between the sigma70 NCR and beta' SNCRID increases the likelihood that an initial transcribing complex will abort and release 11-, 12-, or 13-nt transcripts rather than escape into productive elongation. Conversely, we found that strengthening the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction resulted in decreased abortive probabilities (Supplementary Figure S2D). The sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction thus functionally counteracts the sigma2/beta' coiled-coil interaction, disruption of which facilitates promoter escape (Chan and Gross, 2001).

Figure 8.

Figure 8 :

Substitutions that weaken the interaction between the sigma70 NCR and beta' SNCRID increase abortive transcript synthesis. (A, C) Single-round in vitro transcription assays using a PR' template and RNAP holoenzymes containing the indicated sigma70 and beta' ((C) only) proteins. All RNAP holoenzymes in (A) contain wild-type beta'. Shown are the 8-, 9-, 11-, 12-, and 13-nt abortive transcripts and the 194-nt terminated transcript (T) produced from the PR' template. (B, D) Effects of sigma70 and beta' substitutions on abortive probabilities at +8, +9, +11, +12, and +13. Abortive probability values, which describe the probability that RNAP will release an abortive RNA rather than extend at least one more nucleotide, were calculated for each position by dividing the number of moles of each RNA species by the total number of moles of all RNA species of equal or greater size (e.g. 11-nt/(11-nt+12-nt+13-nt+T)). Error bars represent standard deviations from at least three separate experiments.

View full figure (139 KB)

Weakening the interaction between the sigma70 NCR and the beta' SNCRID does not specifically affect open complex stability

As well as decreasing abortive transcript synthesis, the L402F substitution destabilizes open complexes (Ko et al, 1998), suggesting a relationship between open complex stability and abortive yield (Roberts and Roberts, 1996; Hsu, 2002). To address the possibility that disrupting the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction inhibits promoter escape (increases abortive yields) by increasing open complex stability, we measured the kinetics of open complex dissociation for RNAP reconstituted with WT sigma70, sigma70 L402F, and the doubly substituted sigma70 proteins (see Supplementary Results). We observed no correlation (positive or negative) between the effects of our sigma70 NCR substitutions on open complex stability, on the one hand, and abortive yields, on the other (Supplementary Figure S4). We therefore conclude that the interaction between the sigma70 NCR and the beta' SNCRID affects abortive transcript synthesis through a mechanism that does not involve open complex stability.

Discussion

Top

Through a genetic screen for sigma70 mutations that affect sigma70-dependent promoter-proximal pausing, we have identified a previously uncharacterized interaction between the sigma70 NCR and an N-terminal domain of beta' that we call the beta' SNCRID. Our genetic data suggest that this interaction is mediated in part by positively charged residues in the sigma70 NCR and negatively charged residues in the beta' SNCRID, and mutant-suppressor analysis identified oppositely charged residues that likely approach one another closely at the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interface (Supplementary Figure S5). Interaction between the sigma70 NCR and the beta' SNCRID is consistent with FRET-based structural models of the E. coli RNAP holoenzyme and open complex (Mekler et al, 2002). We found that the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction functions to facilitate promoter escape and inhibit sigma70-dependent promoter-proximal pausing, as substitutions that weakened the interaction increased abortive transcript synthesis, and also increased pausing, whereas substitutions that strengthened the interaction had the opposite effects. The interaction between the sigma70 NCR and the beta' SNCRID functionally counteracts the interaction between sigma2 and the beta' coiled-coil in that the latter inhibits promoter escape (Chan and Gross, 2001) and promotes pausing (Ko et al, 1998).

Mechanistic significance of sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction

The correlation between the promoter escape and pausing phenotypes caused by altering the strength of the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction underscores the relationship between these two processes. During both transcription initiation and early elongation pausing, sigma2 is bound to the nontemplate strand of a -10 (or -10-like) element (Ring et al, 1996; Marr and Roberts, 1997; Young et al, 2001). According to current models, the abortive phase of transcription involves the synthesis and release of short RNA products while RNAP maintains its contacts with the promoter (with the -10 element, in particular) (Roberts and Roberts, 1996; Hsu, 2002). For this to occur—that is, for transcript elongation to occur without forward translocation of the enzyme with respect to the core promoter elements—it has been proposed that excess template DNA must transiently be accommodated in the main channel of the enzyme in a process referred to as DNA 'scrunching', a proposal that has recently received direct experimental support (Kapanidis et al, 2006; Revyakin et al, 2006). The strain that accumulates during this DNA scrunching process can be relieved either by the release of an abortive RNA product or by breakage of the promoter contacts (i.e. promoter escape).

Events similar to those that occur during abortive initiation are thought to occur during early elongation pausing at PR' (Marr and Roberts, 2000). Specifically, the location of the -10-like pause element (12 bp downstream from the PR' -10 element) suggests that sigma2 initially engages the -10-like element when the nascent transcript is approx12 nt in length. The nascent RNA is then extended while sigma2 remains bound to the -10-like element (requiring DNA scrunching) to produce either a 16- or 17-nt pause product. At this point, the interaction between sigma2 and the pause element evidently hinders further extension and the accumulated strain can be relieved in one of two ways. Either the contacts between sigma2 and the -10-like element are broken and pause capture does not occur, or RNAP enters a backtracked state in which the catalytic center of the enzyme slides back relative to the 3' end of the nascent RNA transcript (returning to the +12 position; Marr and Roberts, 2000) and pause capture occurs. For RNAP to escape the pause, transcript cleavage (or forward translocation) must occur to regenerate a 3' end (or reposition the existing 3' end) at the enzyme's catalytic center (Marr and Roberts, 2000). According to this model, the events that cause RNAP to release longer abortive RNA products during the early stages of transcription are analogous to events that cause RNAP to pause during early elongation.

The analogy between the events that occur during the abortive phase of transcription and the events that occur during early elongation pausing suggests a possible explanation for the effect of the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction on the two processes. In particular, we propose that the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction might destabilize the interaction of sigma2 with nontemplate strand DNA, specifically under conditions of DNA scrunching, thus facilitating promoter escape and hindering pause capture. In support of this proposal is our finding that disrupting the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction did not have a specific effect on open complex half-life; an increase in open complex half-life would have been expected if the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction functioned to destabilize the sigma2/nontemplate strand interaction under all conditions.

Function of the sigma NCR in other bacteria

Although not strictly required for transcription in vitro (Kumar et al, 1995), we found that removal of the sigma70 NCR severely compromised cell growth (see also Kumar et al, 1995), suggesting that it plays an important role in transcription from at least some promoters. Moreover, the sigma70 NCR (despite its name) resembles the nonconserved regions of primary sigma factors from other Gram-negative proteobacteria including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Vibrio cholerae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Caulobacter crescentus. Interestingly, the majority of substitutions that we isolated in our genetic screen affect residue positions that are among the most conserved within the family of sigma70-type NCRs. For example, while the NCRs of the primary sigma factors in P. aeruginosa and V. cholerae are only 37 and 56% identical, respectively, to the E. coli sigma70 NCR (residues 127–373), the residues at 13 of the 15 positions identified in our screen were conserved across all three species. We suggest, therefore, that the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction is likely to be conserved as well.

Although high-resolution structures are available for RNAP holoenzymes from Thermus aquaticus (Taq) and Thermus thermophilus (Murakami et al, 2002; Vassylyev et al, 2002), they are not informative with regard to the E. coli sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction because the corresponding regions of Thermus sigmaA and beta' are greatly diverged from their counterparts in E. coli. In particular, beta' from the Thermus species contains a large (293 residue) inserted domain (the beta' NCD) in the region corresponding to the beta' SNCRID and conversely, the Thermus sigmaA NCR is significantly smaller than the sigma70 NCR (72 versus 247 residues) (Iyer et al, 2004). Nevertheless, the sigmaA NCR is positioned to interact with a portion of the beta' NCD in high-resolution structural models of the Thermus RNAP holoenzymes (Chlenov et al, 2005). Consistent with this structural information, the bacterial two-hybrid assay permits detection of an interaction between the Taq sigmaA NCR and the Taq beta' NCD (M Leibman and A Hochschild, unpublished data). Experiments are underway to determine whether this interaction is functionally analogous to the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction in E. coli.

Functional antagonism between the sigma2/beta' coiled-coil and the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interactions

The sigma2/beta' coiled-coil interaction and the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction have opposing effects on both promoter escape and early elongation pausing, raising the question of how this facilitates the transcription process. Previous work has demonstrated that the sigma2/beta' coiled-coil interaction is critical during promoter open complex formation, being required for promoter melting and contributing importantly to open complex stability (Young et al, 2001, 2004). However, by the same token, the sigma2/beta' coiled-coil interaction, which is required for sigma2 to establish sequence-specific contact with nontemplate strand DNA, limits promoter escape (and also escape from sigma70-dependent promoter-proximal pause sites) (Ko et al, 1998; Chan and Gross, 2001). Moreover, evidence suggests that the beta' coiled-coil interacts more strongly with region 2 of sigma70 than with region 2 of sigma38 (which lacks the NCR) (S Garrity, A Yuan, and A Hochschild, unpublished data). Thus, we speculate that the sigma70 form of the RNAP holoenzyme may require an opposing interaction to facilitate its escape from the promoter into productive elongation (see Figure 9). Our suggestion that the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction functions to destabilize (directly or indirectly) the interaction of sigma2 with nontemplate strand DNA specifically under conditions of DNA scrunching explains how the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction might facilitate promoter escape in a manner that does not compromise open complex formation. We speculate further that the sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interaction may provide a target for regulatory factors that could modulate either promoter escape or escape from an early elongation pause.

Figure 9.

Figure 9 :

Model depicting opposing sigma2/beta' coiled-coil and sigma70 NCR/beta' SNCRID interactions. According to this model, optimal interaction between sigma2 and the beta' coiled-coil (beta'cc) promotes interaction between sigma2 and the nontemplate strand of the -10 element (sigma domains shown in black). The functionally antagonistic interaction between the sigma70 NCR and beta' SNCRID distorts the interaction between sigma2 and the beta'cc, facilitating the release of sigma2 from the DNA (sigma domains shown as dashed outline).

View full figure (25 KB)

Materials and methods

Top

Expression vectors

Plasmid pBRsigma70 contains the complete coding sequence of the sigma70 subunit of E. coli RNAP under the control of a weak constitutive synthetic promoter with the sequence TTTACAACATGAAGTAACTTCTCGCATTATGTCTCGA. Plasmid pBRbeta' contains the complete coding sequence of the beta' subunit of E. coli RNAP under the control of the same weak constitutive synthetic promoter. Additionally, pBRbeta' contains the following restriction sites introduced as silent mutations into the beta' coding sequence: NotI at codons 257–259, XhoI at codons 872–873, and BamHI at codons 1182–1183. Plasmid pBRalpha (Dove et al, 1997) encodes the alpha subunit of E. coli RNAP under the control of tandem lpp and lacUV5 promoters. Plasmids pBRalpha-beta' 55–261 and pBRalpha-beta' 262–309 are pBRalpha derivatives that encode residues 1–248 of the alpha subunit of E. coli RNAP fused to residues 55–261 and 262–309, respectively, of the beta' subunit of E. coli RNAP under the control of tandem lpp and lacUV5 promoters. Plasmid pAClambdaCI (Dove et al, 1997) encodes lambdaCI under the control of the lacUV5 promoter. Plasmid pAClambdaCI-sigma70 94–448 is a pAClambdaCI derivative that encodes lambdaCI (residues 1–236) fused to residues 94–448 of the sigma70 subunit of E. coli RNAP. Plasmid pAClambdaQ (Nickels et al, 2002) encodes lambdaQ under the control of the lacUV5 promoter. Plasmid pACDeltaQ (Nickels et al, 2002) encodes no functional lambdaQ.

Strains and test promoters

Reporter strain BN147 contains sequence extending from -109 to +232 of lambdaPR' fused to a lacZ reporter gene. This reporter fusion is present on an F' episome and has been described (Nickels et al, 2002). Reporter strain ML35 is identical to BN147 except that it contains the lambdaPR' mutation A(+5)T (Ring and Roberts, 1994). We constructed a derivative of strain FW102 (Whipple, 1998) that has a mutation encoding the L402F substitution at the chromosomal rpoD locus linked to a kanamycin resistance gene. The resulting strain, ML6, was mated with donor strains BN147 and ML35 to create the rpoD(L402F) reporter strains ML9 (lambdaPR') and ML37 (lambdaPR' A[+5]T), respectively. Strain ML102, a derivative of strain BL21(DE3), carries the L402F mutation at the chromosomal rpoD locus linked to a kanamycin resistance gene.

Libraries and screening

Expression libraries were generated by error-prone PCR of the complete coding sequence of sigma70 (in three segments) and of the sequence encoding residues 1–258 of beta' in pBRsigma70 and pBRbeta', respectively. Libraries were cotransformed with pAClambdaQ into reporter strain ML37 and plated on indicator medium containing X-gal (60 mug/ml), IPTG (10 muM), and tPEG (250 muM). The lambdaPR' A(+5)T mutation (Ring and Roberts, 1994) in strain ML37 enhanced the difference in lambdaQ-dependent lacZ activity between cells containing plasmid-encoded and chromosomally encoded sigma70 L402F, and cells containing plasmid-encoded sigma70 WT in addition to chromosomally encoded sigma70 L402F. Library clones were screened for those that resulted in increased lacZ activity relative to unmutagenized pBRsigma70(L402F) or pBRbeta'. Identified mutations were recloned into pBRsigma70 or pBRbeta' before cotransforming with either pAClambdaQ or pACDeltaQ into reporter strain ML9 for beta-galactosidase assays.

beta-Galactosidase assays

Cells were grown in LB supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics at the following concentrations: carbenicillin (100 mug/ml), tetracycline (10 mug/ml), chloramphenicol (25 mug/ml), and kanamycin (50 mug/ml). IPTG was used at the indicated concentrations. SDS–CHCl3-permeabilized cells were assayed as described (Dove and Hochschild, 2004).

Proteins

His6-tagged sigma70 proteins were purified as described after overproduction from plasmid pLNH12-His (Panaghie et al, 2000) in BL21DE3 cells. RNAP core enzymes were purified as described (Vrentas et al, 2005) from strain ML102 cells containing plasmid pVS10 (Artsimovitch et al, 2003), which directs the synthesis of high levels of alpha, beta, beta'-His6, and omega. The presence of the L402F mutation at the chromosomal rpoD locus in ML102 cells ensured that the core enzyme preparations were not contaminated with WT sigma70. Holoenzyme was formed by incubating the core enzyme with a 5- to 10-fold excess of the appropriate sigma70 protein. lambdaQ and NusA proteins were gifts from J Roberts.

In vitro transcription

The transcription assays were performed with holoenzymes prepared as described above except for the assay shown in the left-hand panel of Figure 4A, which was performed using holoenzyme reconstituted from commercially obtained E. coli RNAP core (Epicentre) and purified sigma70 proteins. For analysis of promoter-proximal pausing under single-round conditions, open complexes were formed by incubating 40 nM RNAP with 5 nM lambdaPR' or placUV5 template for 10 min at 37°C in transcription buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT, 50 mM KCl, and 100 mug/ml BSA) plus either 200 muM each of ATP, GTP and CTP and 50 muM [alpha-32P]UTP (4 mCi/ml) to generate internally labeled RNA or 200 muM each of GTP, CTP and UTP and 50 muM [gamma-32P]ATP (1 mCi/ml) to generate end-labeled RNA. Transcription was initiated by addition of 4 mM MgCl2 and 5 mug/ml rifampicin, and the reactions were incubated at 37°C. At the indicated times after the addition of the MgCl2–rifampicin mixture, aliquots of each reaction were removed and quenched in five volumes of stop buffer (600 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, and 12 mM EDTA) supplemented with tRNA. Samples were then extracted with phenol/chloroform (1:1), precipitated with ethanol, resuspended in 4.5 mul loading buffer (95% (v/v) formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.05% (w/v) bromophenol blue, 0.05% (w/v) xylene cyanol), and electrophoresed on 15% (w/v) polyacrylamide sequencing gels. Bands were visualized by phosphorimager.

For analysis of abortive transcript synthesis under single-round conditions, open complexes were formed by incubating 40 nM RNAP with 5 nM lambdaPR' template for 10 min at 37°C in transcription buffer. Reactions were initiated by the simultaneous addition of 50 mug/ml heparin plus 100 muM each of UTP, GTP and CTP and 50 muM [gamma-32P]ATP at 1 mCi/ml. Reactions were incubated for 20 min at 37°C before they were quenched with five volumes of stop buffer. Samples were then prepared for electrophoresis and electrophoresed as described above.

For all in vitro transcription assays with lambdaPR', linear template DNA, which was generated by the PCR from plasmid pFW11-PR'-lacZ (Nickels et al, 2002), contained PR' sequence extending from -109 to +232. For in vitro transcription assays with placUV5, linear template DNA was generated by the PCR from a pFW11-derived plasmid carrying placUV5 sequence extending from -60 to +36 (Nickels et al, 2004).



Acknowledgements

Top

We thank S Dove and B Nickels for their comments on the manuscript, S Garrity for assistance in preparing Figure 3 and C Vrentas, T Gaal, W Ross, and R Saecker for helpful suggestions. We also thank J Roberts for purified NusA and lambdaQ proteins, V Svetlov and I Artsimovitch for RNAP expression vectors, C Gross for sigma70 shut-off strain CAG20153, and S Garrity for plasmids pBRalpha-beta' 55–261, pBRalpha-beta' 262–309, and pAClambdaCI-sigma70 94–448. This work was supported by NIH grant GM44025 to AH.

References

Top

Arthur TM, Burgess RR (1998) Localization of a sigma70 binding site on the N terminus of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase beta' subunit. J Biol Chem 273: 31381–31387 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Artsimovitch I, Landick R (2000) Pausing by bacterial RNA polymerase is mediated by mechanistically distinct classes of signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 7090–7095 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

Artsimovitch I, Svetlov V, Murakami KS, Landick R (2003) Co-overexpression of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase subunits allows isolation and analysis of mutant enzymes lacking lineage-specific sequence insertions. J Biol Chem 278: 12344–12355 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Bown J, Barne K, Minchin S, Busby S (1997) Extended-10 promoters. Nucleic Acids Mol Biol 11: 41–52 | ChemPort |

Chan CL, Gross CA (2001) The anti-initial transcribed sequence, a portable sequence that impedes promoter escape, requires sigma70 for function. J Biol Chem 276: 38201–38209 | PubMed | ChemPort |

Chlenov M, Masuda S, Murakami KS, Nikiforov V, Darst SA, Mustaev A (2005) Structure and function of lineage-specific sequence insertions in the bacterial RNA polymerase beta' subunit. J Mol Biol 353: 138–154 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

deHaseth PL, Zupancic ML, Record Jr TM (1998) RNA polymerase–promoter interactions: the comings and goings of RNA polymerase. J Bacteriol 180: 3019–3025 | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Deighan P, Hochschild A (2007) The bacteriophage lambda Q anti-terminator protein regulates late gene expression as a stable component of the transcription elongation complex. Mol Microbiol 63: 911–920 | PubMed | ChemPort |

Dove SL, Hochschild A (2004) A bacterial two-hybrid system based on transcription activation. Methods Mol Biol 261: 231–246 | PubMed | ChemPort |

Dove SL, Joung JK, Hochschild A (1997) Activation of prokaryotic transcription through arbitrary protein–protein contacts. Nature 386: 627–630 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Ebright RH (2000) RNA polymerase: structural similarities between bacterial RNA polymerase and eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. J Mol Biol 304: 687–698 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Feklistov A, Barinova N, Sevostyanova A, Heyduk E, Bass I, Vvedenskaya I, Kuznedelov K, Merkiene E, Stavrovskaya E, Klimasauskas S, Nikiforov V, Heyduk T, Severinov K, Kulbachinskiy A (2006) A basal promoter element recognized by free RNA polymerase sigma subunit determines promoter recognition by RNA polymerase holoenzyme. Mol Cell 23: 97–107 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

Geszvain K, Gruber TM, Mooney RA, Gross CA, Landick R (2004) A hydrophobic patch on the flap-tip helix of E. coli RNA polymerase mediates sigma70 region 4 function. J Mol Biol 343: 569–587 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

Grayhack EJ, Yang XJ, Lau LF, Roberts JW (1985) Phage lambda gene-Q antiterminator recognizes RNA-polymerase near the promoter and accelerates it through a pause site. Cell 42: 259–269 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Gross CA, Chan C, Dombroski A, Gruber T, Sharp M, Tupy J, Young B (1998) Thefunctional and regulatory roles of sigma factors in transcription. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 63: 141–155 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Haugen SP, Berkmen MB, Ross W, Gaal T, Ward C, Gourse RL (2006) rRNA promoter regulation by nonoptimal binding of sigma region 1.2: an additional recognition element for RNA polymerase. Cell 125: 1069–1082 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

Hsu LM (1996) Quantitative parameters for promoter clearance. Methods Enzymol 273: 59–71 | PubMed | ChemPort |

Hsu LM (2002) Promoter clearance and escape in prokaryotes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1577: 191–207 | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Iyer LM, Koonin EV, Aravind L (2004) Evolution of bacterial RNA polymerase: implications for large-scale bacterial phylogeny, domain accretion, and horizontal gene transfer. Gene 335: 73–88 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

Kapanidis AN, Margeat E, Ho SO, Kortkhonjia E, Weiss S, Ebright RH (2006) Initial transcription by RNA polymerase proceeds through a DNA-scrunching mechanism. Science 314: 1144–1147 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Ko DC, Marr MT, Guo TS, Roberts JW (1998) A surface of Escherichia coli sigma70 required for promoter function and antitermination by phage lambda Q protein. Genes Dev 12: 3276–3285 | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Kumar A, Williamson HS, Fujita N, Ishihama A, Hayward RS (1995) A partially functional 245-amino-acid internal deletion derivative of Escherichia coli sigma70. J Bacteriol 177: 5193–5196 | PubMed | ChemPort |

Kuznedelov K, Minakhin L, Niedziela-Majka A, Dove SL, Rogulja D, Nickels BE, Hochschild A, Heyduk T, Severinov K (2002) A role for interaction of the RNA polymerase flap domain with the sigma subunit in promoter recognition. Science 295: 855–857 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Lonetto M, Gribskov M, Gross CA (1992) The sigma70 family: sequence conservation and evolutionary relationships. J Bacteriol 174: 3843–3849 | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Malhotra A, Severinova E, Darst SA (1996) Crystal structure of a sigma70 fragment from E. coli RNA polymerase. Cell 87: 127–136 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Marr MT, Roberts JW (1997) Promoter recognition as measured by binding of polymerase to nontemplate strand oligonucleotide. Science 276: 1258–1260 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Marr MT, Roberts JW (2000) Function of transcription cleavage factors GreA and GreB at a regulatory pause site. Mol Cell 6: 1275–1285 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Mekler V, Kortkhonjia E, Mukhopadhyay J, Knight J, Revyakin A, Kapanidis AN, Niu W, Ebright YW, Levy R, Ebright RH (2002) Structural organization of bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme and the RNA polymerase–promoter open complex. Cell 108: 599–614 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Mooney RA, Darst SA, Landick R (2005) Sigma and RNA polymerase: an on-again, off-again relationship? Mol Cell 20: 335–345 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Murakami KS, Darst SA (2003) Bacterial RNA polymerases: the whole story. Curr Opin Struct Biol 13: 31–39 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Murakami KS, Masuda S, Darst SA (2002) Structural basis of transcription initiation: T. aquaticus RNA polymerase holoenzyme at 4 A resolution. Science 296: 1280–1284 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Nickels BE, Garrity SJ, Mekler V, Minakhin L, Severinov K, Ebright RH, Hochschild A (2005) The interaction between sigma70 and the beta flap of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase inhibits extension of nascent RNA during early elongation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 4488–4493 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

Nickels BE, Mukhopadhyay J, Garrity SJ, Ebright RH, Hochschild A (2004) The sigma70 subunit of RNA polymerase mediates a promoter-proximal pause at the lac promoter. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11: 544–550 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

Nickels BE, Roberts CW, Sun H, Roberts JW, Hochschild A (2002) The sigma70 subunit of RNA polymerase is contacted by the lambdaQ antiterminator during early elongation. Mol Cell 10: 611–622 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Panaghie G, Aiyar SE, Bobb KL, Hayward RS, deHaseth PL (2000) Aromatic amino acids in region 2.3 of Escherichia coli sigma 70 participate collectively in the formation of an RNA polymerase–promoter open complex. J Mol Biol 299: 1217–1230 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Revyakin A, Liu C, Ebright RH, Strick TR (2006) Abortive initiation and productive initiation by RNA polymerase involve DNA scrunching. Science 314: 1139–1143 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Ring BZ, Roberts JW (1994) Function of a nontranscribed DNA strand site in transcription elongation. Cell 78: 317–324 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Ring BZ, Yarnell WS, Roberts JW (1996) Function of E. coli RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma70 in promoter-proximal pausing. Cell 86: 485–493 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Roberts CW, Roberts JW (1996) Base-specific recognition of the nontemplate strand of promoter DNA by E. coli RNA polymerase. Cell 86: 495–501 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Roberts JW, Yarnell W, Bartlett E, Guo J, Marr M, Ko DC, Sun H, Roberts CW (1998) Antitermination by bacteriophage lambda Q protein. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 63: 319–325 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Sharp MM, Chan CL, Lu CZ, Marr MT, Nechaev S, Merritt EW, Severinov K, Roberts JW, Gross CA (1999) The interface of sigma with core RNA polymerase is extensive, conserved, and functionally specialized. Genes Dev 13: 3015–3026 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Vassylyev DG, Sekine S, Laptenko O, Lee J, Vassylyeva MN, Borukhov S, Yokoyama S (2002) Crystal structure of a bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme at 2.6. Å resolution. Nature 417: 712–719 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Vrentas CE, Gaal T, Ross W, Ebright RH, Gourse RL (2005) Response of RNA polymerase to ppGpp: requirement for the omega subunit and relief of this requirement by DksA. Genes Dev 19: 2378–2387 | Article | PubMed | ChemPort |

Whipple FW (1998) Genetic analysis of prokaryotic and eukaryotic DNA-binding proteins in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 26: 3700–3706 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Yarnell WS, Roberts JW (1992) The phage lambda gene Q transcription antiterminator binds DNA in the late gene promoter as it modifies RNA-polymerase. Cell 69: 1181–1189 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Young BA, Anthony LC, Gruber TM, Arthur TM, Heyduk E, Lu CZ, Sharp MM, Heyduk T, Burgess RR, Gross CA (2001) A coiled-coil from the RNA polymerase beta' subunit allosterically induces selective nontemplate strand binding by sigma70. Cell 105: 935–944 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Young BA, Gruber TM, Gross CA (2004) Minimal machinery of RNA polymerase holoenzyme sufficient for promoter melting. Science 303: 1382–1384 | Article | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

NEWS AND VIEWS

Open season on RNA polymerase

Nature Structural Biology News and Views (01 Jul 2002)

RNA-mediated signaling in transcription

Nature Structural Biology News and Views (01 May 1998)

See all 4 matches for News And Views