The EMBO Journal
 
Advanced search
Journal home
Current issue
Advance Online Publication
Web Focuses
Archive
Browse by subject
Free online sample issue
Aims and scope
Press releases
ToC by email
Authors & Referees
Guide for authors
Submit an Article
Guide for referees
Editorial Team, Senior Advisors and Advisory Editorial Board
Contact Editorial office
Customer services
Subscribe
Order sample copy
Purchase articles
Reprints and permissions
Contact NPG
Advertising
EMBO
www.embo.org
Article
Subject Categories: Genome Stability & Dynamics
The EMBO Journal (2005) 24, 4345–4355, doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600896
Published online 1 December 2005
Distinct modes of ATR activation after replication stress and DNA double-strand breaks in Caenorhabditis elegans
Tatiana Garcia-Muse and Simon J Boulton
DNA Damage Response Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, The London Research Institute, Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms, UK

To whom correspondence should be addressed
Simon J Boulton, DNA Damage Response Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, The London Research Institute, Clare Hall Laboratories, Blanche Lane, South Mimms, Herts EN6 3LD, UK. Tel.: +44 1707 625774; Fax: +44 2072 693801; E-mail: simon.boulton@cancer.org.uk

Received 30 August 2005; Accepted 10 November 2005; Published online 1 December 2005.
Abstract
ATM and ATR are key components of the DNA damage checkpoint. ATR primarily responds to UV damage and replication stress, yet may also function with ATM in the checkpoint response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), although this is less clear. Here, we show that atl-1 (Caenorhabditis elegans ATR) and rad-5/clk-2 prevent mitotic catastrophe, function in the S-phase checkpoint and also cooperate with atm-1 in the checkpoint response to DSBs after ionizing radiation (IR) to induce cell cycle arrest or apoptosis via the cep-1(p53)/egl-1 pathway. ATL-1 is recruited to stalled replication forks by RPA-1 and functions upstream of rad-5/clk-2 in the S-phase checkpoint. In contrast, mre-11 and atm-1 are dispensable for ATL-1 recruitment to stalled replication forks. However, mre-11 is required for RPA-1 association and ATL-1 recruitment to DSBs. Thus, DNA processing controlled by mre-11 is important for ATL-1 activation at DSBs but not following replication fork stalling. We propose that atl-1 and rad-5/clk-2 respond to single-stranded DNA generated by replication stress and function with atm-1 following DSB resection.
Keywords: ATR, checkpoint, DSBs, replication stress
Send to a friendEmail link to a friend
PDFDownload PDF
Full textFull text
Next article
Previous article
Table of contents
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
order commercial reprintsReprints
ToC alertRegister for table of contents by email
  Privacy policy Copyright © 2005 by the European Molecular Biology Organization