The EMBO Journal
 
Advanced search
Journal home
Aims and scope
Current issue
Advance Online Publication
Web Focuses
Archive:-
Browse by issue
Browse by subject
Browse by category
Free online sample issue
Press releases
Authors & Referees
Editorial process
Guide for authors
Submit an article
Guide for referees
Editorial Team, Senior Advisors and Advisory Editorial Board
Contact Editorial office
Customer services
Subscribe
Order sample copy
Purchase articles
Reprints and permissions
Contact NPG
Advertising
EMBO
www.embo.org
Article
Subject Categories: RNA | Proteins
The EMBO Journal (2003) 22, 5941–5950, doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg561
Sequences that direct significant levels of frameshifting are frequent in coding regions of Escherichia coli
Olga L. Gurvich1, Pavel V. Baranov1, Jiadong Zhou2, Andrew W. Hammer1, Raymond F. Gesteland1 and John F. Atkins1
1 Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, 15N 2030E Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5330, USA
2 Present address: Gene Technology Division, Nitto Denko Technical Corporation, 401 Jones Road, Oceanside, CA 92054, USA

To whom correspondence should be addressed
John F. Atkins, atkins@howard.genetics.utah.edu

Received 24 April 2003; Revised 27 August 2003; Accepted 12 September 2003.
Abstract
It is generally believed that significant ribosomal frameshifting during translation does not occur without a functional purpose. The distribution of two frameshift-prone sequences, A_AAA_AAG and CCC_TGA, in coding regions of Escherichia coli has been analyzed. Although a moderate level of selection against the first sequence is evident, 68 genes contain A_AAA_AAG and 19 contain CCC_TGA. The majority of those tested in their genomic context showed >1% frameshifting. Comparative sequence analysis was employed to assess a potential biological role for frameshifting in decoding these genes. Two new candidates, in pheL and ydaY, for utilized frameshifting have been identified in addition to those previously known in dnaX and nine insertion sequence elements. For the majority of the shift-prone sequences no functional role can be attributed to them, and the frameshifting is likely erroneous. However, none of frameshift sequences is in the 306 most highly expressed genes. The unexpected conclusion is that moderate frameshifting during expression of at least some other genes is not sufficiently harmful for cells to trigger strong negative evolutionary pressure.
Keywords: frameshifting, genomics, proline, translational errors
Send to a friendEmail link to a friend
PDFDownload PDF
Full textFull text
Next article
Previous article
Table of contents
rights and permissionsRights and permissions
order commercial reprintsReprints
ToC alertRegister for table of contents by email
  Privacy policy Copyright © 2003 by the European Molecular Biology Organization