Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works NATURE.COM NATURE NEWS NATUREJOBS NATUREEVENTS ABOUT NPG
Help Nature.com site index  
European Journal of Human Genetics
SEARCH     advanced search my account e-alerts subscribe register
Journal home
Advance online publication
Current issue
Archive
Press releases
For authors
For referees
Contact editorial office
About the journal
About the society
For librarians
Subscribe
Advertising
naturereprints
Contact NPG
Customer services
Site features
NPG Subject areas
Access material from all our publications in your subject area:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Cancer Cancer
Chemistry Chemistry
Dentistry Dentistry
Development Development
Drug Discovery Drug Discovery
Earth Sciences Earth Sciences
Evolution & Ecology Evolution & Ecology
Genetics Genetics
Immunology Immunology
Materials Materials Science
Medical Research Medical Research
Microbiology Microbiology
Molecular Cell Biology Molecular Cell Biology
Neuroscience Neuroscience
Pharmacology Pharmacology
Physics Physics
Browse all publications
 
October 2000, Volume 8, Number 10, Pages 739-742
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF
Article
Protection of privacy by third-party encryption in genetic research in Iceland
Jeffrey R Gulcher, Kristleifur Kristjánsson, Hákon Gudbjartsson and Kári Stefánsson

Decode Genetics, Inc., Lynghals 1, Reykjavik, Iceland

Correspondence to: Jeffrey R Gulcher orKári Stefánsson , Tel: + 354 570 1900; E-mail: jgulcher@decode.is; kstefans@decode.is

Abstract

As the new human genetics continues its dramatic expansion into many laboratories and medical institutions, the concern for the protection of the personal privacy of individuals who participate increases. It seems that even the smallest of laboratories must confront the issue of how to protect the genetic and phenotypic information of participants in their research. Some have promoted the use of anonymity as a way out of this dilemma. But we are reminded by others that the future cannot be predicted, and that future benefits may be lost when the links to these benevolent volunteers are gone forever. More recently, some ethical bodies have suggested, without specific recommendations, that a reversible third-party encryption system may be a solution to this problem. However, they have not provided a route or even examples of how to proceed. We present here the Icelandic approach to this issue by developing a third-party encryption system in direct collaboration with the Data Protection Commission (DPC) of Iceland. We have incorporated the encryption system within our sample collection and storage software, which minimises inconvenience but enhances security. The strategy assures a barrier between the laboratory and the outside world that can only be crossed by the DPC. European Journal of Human Genetics (2000) 8, 739-742.

Keywords

ethics; genetics; encryption; third-party; privacy; database; sample bank; biobank

Received 17 February 2000; revised 26 May 2000; accepted 7 June 2000
October 2000, Volume 8, Number 10, Pages 739-742
Table of contents    Previous  Abstract  Next   Article  PDF
Privacy Policy © 2000 Nature Publishing Group