INTRODUCTION

17β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 10 (HSD10) is a mitochondrial enzyme involved in the degradation pathway of isoleucine and branched-chain fatty acids.1 This enzyme has also been found to be involved in the metabolism of sex steroid hormones, neuroactive steroids and in the detoxification of cytotoxic aldehydes.2, 3 HSD10 deficiency (OMIM 300256) is an X-linked defect caused by mutations in the HSD17B10 gene. Clinically, the great majority of male patients show normal early development followed by progressive loss of mental and motor skills.1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 However, three patients were identified who presented symptoms in the first days of life.1, 11 It has recently been shown that symptoms of these patients are unrelated to accumulation of metabolites in the isoleucine pathway and that the neurological handicap can be associated with an imbalance in neurosteroid metabolism12 or to defects in general mitochondrial function.13 In addition, the splice variant c.574C>A of HSD17B10 gene has been associated with a new syndromic form of X-linked mental retardation, choreoathetosis and abnormal behaviour.14

The HSD17B10 gene has been mapped to chromosome Xp11.215 and has been reported as one of the few genes that escapes X-inactivation.16 To date, 10 female patients with HSD10 deficiency have been described presenting a variety of symptoms, from borderline learning difficulties to psychomotor and speech delay.5, 9, 11 We previously studied two of these female patients. One of them was heterozygous for the p.N247S mutation and was severely affected, whereas the other was heterozygous for the p.P210S mutation and presented a slight clinical affectation.11 To elucidate as to why these two female patients were so differently affected, we performed HSD17B10 cDNA quantitative analysis in both female patients and in control fibroblasts, the results of which are reported here.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Material

Skin biopsies from patients of two unrelated Spanish families with HSD10 deficiency were obtained: family 1 consisting of a male patient (1IIM) and his carrier sister (1IIF), both with a severe phenotype (Figure 1a); family 2 consisting of a male patient (2IIM), with a severe phenotype, and his heterozygous mother (2IF), with a slight clinical affectation (Figure 1a). Both families have been described previously.11 Eight cell lines (four males and four females) from our cell bank were used as controls.

Figure 1
figure 1

Pedigree (a) and cDNA sequence (b) of families 1 and 2.

All the samples were obtained according to the Declaration of Helsinki and informed consent was signed by all the patients or their parents.

Molecular studies

cDNAs were obtained from cultured fibroblasts, were amplified by PCR and sequenced using standard protocols and oligonucleotides designed in-house (sequences available upon request). All HSD17B10 cDNAs were quantified by the StepOnePlus real-time PCR System using the Comparative Ct (ΔΔCt) method from StepOne software v2.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The Primer Express 3.0 software (Applied Biosystems) was used to design two sets of primers and probes to differentiate wild-type (Wt) and mutant (Mut) alleles corresponding to mutations p.N247S (c.740A>G) and p.P210S (c.628C>T) of the HSD17B10 gene. We used two different endogenous controls: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (PN4310884E) and cyclophilin A (PPIA, PN4310883E) (Applied Biosystems). As additional control, a mixed pool of four healthy male cDNAs was used in each analysis.

Gene nucleotide numbering was carried out according to sequence RefSeq NM_004493 with +1 as A of the ATG start codon. The ATG codon represents +1 for the amino-acid numbering according to the HSD10 protein sequence NP_004484.

X-inactivation studies

The androgen-receptor locus (AR) methylation assay was performed in genomic DNA of female carriers as described previously.17 If the AR locus was uninformative, skewing was assessed at FMR1 locus.18 Briefly, genomic DNA (300 ng) was digested with 5 U of HpaII (both for the AR and FMR1 assays) in a total volume of 20 μl. For each sample, an undigested control was prepared. We define the pattern of X-chromosome inactivation as skewed when the inactivation percentage was over 80%.

Statistical methods

Statistical studies for the analyses of relative quantification (RQ) in male and female controls were performed using the non-parametric two-related sample Wilcoxon's test, with the SPSS software (version 14.0 for Windows).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

HSD17B10 has been reported as one of the few genes that escapes X-inactivation,16 which predicts that female carriers would not be affected. However, 10 female carriers with HSD10 deficiency have been described so far, presenting different degrees of clinical affectation, which is in agreement with an X-linked inheritance with different degrees of X-inactivation.11

To elucidate whether HSD17B10 cDNA doses differed between both sexes, we performed RQ of Wt HSD17B10 cDNA alleles in four female and four male controls (Figure 2). Results of the Wilcoxon statistical test did not show any significant difference between the doses in both sexes, considering the two endogenous controls (P-value=0.07). Therefore, these results are in favour of an X-linked disease that does not escape X-inactivation.

Figure 2
figure 2

RQ of HSD17B10 Wt probes named as p.N247N and p.P210P, with two distinct endogenous controls (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and cyclophilin A) in four male and four female controls. The bars represent the mean of four controls and the error bars represent the mean±SD.

We previously studied two unrelated female patients with different degrees of clinical affectation.11 The female of family 1 (1IIF), like her brother (1IIM), presented a severe phenotype with psychomotor and speech delay, and a clear deficiency of HSD10 activity in fibroblasts.11 When we sequenced her HSD17B10 cDNA, it seemed that only the Mut allele was identified (Figure 1a). Results for the RQ of her HSD17B10 cDNA (Figure 3a) showed that amplification levels of the Mut probe were much higher than those of the Wt probe and very similar to those of her brother (1IIM), independently of the endogenous control used (Figure 3a). To rule out a Turner syndrome, chromosome analysis was performed, which resulted in a normal karyotype (46,XX). Skewed X-inactivation was confirmed by methylation studies. Patient 1IIF was homozygous for AR locus, consequently this study was uninformative, but FMR1 locus showed a skewed X-inactivation pattern (80/20). These results are in agreement with an unfavourable X-inactivation effect of HSD17B10 gene in the analysed tissue. In addition, as the girl was severely affected, a similar unfavourable X-inactivation in other tissues could be expected.

Figure 3
figure 3

RQ of HSD17B10 Wt and Mut probes with two distinct endogenous controls (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and cyclophilin A) in patient and control cDNAs (a) family 1, (b) familiy 2. The bars of controls represent the mean of eight controls (four males+four females), performed in triplicate. The bars of patients represent the mean of triplicate measurements. The error bars represent the mean±SD.

The other female patient (2IF) showed a mild clinical affectation, with learning disabilities and HSD10 activity in fibroblasts within the control range.11 HSD17B10 cDNA sequencing showed the presence of both Mut and Wt alleles (Figure 1b). This observation was in agreement with the results of the RQ studies showing similar HSD17B10 cDNA levels of both Wt and Mut probes, while we were only able to amplify the Mut probe in her severely affected son (2IIM) (Figure 3b). X-inactivation analysis showed a random X-inactivation pattern for AR locus in patient 2IF. These results suggest the presence of both HSD17B10 alleles in this female patient, which is in line with normal X-inactivation and the expression of both alleles in different cells (functional mosaicism). In addition, the normal enzymatic activity found in this female patient11 might be due to lack of sensitivity of the enzymatic technique, or maybe there was enough dose of Wt HSD17B10 mRNA to produce enough HSD10 protein to obtain normal activity.

However, we did observe that the amplification responses were different for each probe when they were corrected by the two different endogenous controls (Figure 3). This could be explained by the low specificity of the probes and by the variability of the endogenous controls. However, in spite of it, the interpretation of the results did not change.

To summarise, here we present the results of HSD17B10 cDNA analysis in two female carriers compared with two male patients and controls. The hypothesis that HSD17B10 is inactivated in one of the X-chromosome is supported by the results in controls, which showed that doses of HSD17B10 cDNA were the same in both sexes (Figure 2). RQ cDNA results for one of the female patient (1IIF), together with the enzymatic studies and the severe clinical presentation, were in agreement with an unfavourable X-inactivation effect. In addition, RQ cDNA results for the other female patient (2IF) seem to reflect the presence of a mosaicism in the studied tissue, which could explain the normal enzymatic activity and her mild phenotype. However, we cannot exclude that differences in disease severity between both female carriers is at least partly due to differences in the effect of the mutations, as the male patient with the p.N247S mutation died at age 2 months, while the patient with p.P210S mutation is alive at 4 years of age.

In conclusion, our results suggest that HSD17B10 gene does not escape X-inactivation as reported previously.16 Heterozygous female patients showed the classical biochemical and clinical variability of X-linked diseases due to random X-chromosome inactivation and the severity of the phenotype will depend on the total dose of Mut mRNA in different tissues as well as on the severity of the mutation.