Article
European Journal of Human Genetics (2009) 17, 1507–1514; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2009.92; published online 27 May 2009
A genome-wide scan of 10 000 gene-centric variants and colorectal cancer risk
Emily Webb1, Peter Broderick1, Steven Lubbe1, Ian Chandler1, Ian Tomlinson2 and Richard S Houlston1
- 1Section of Cancer Genetics, Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey, UK
- 2Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Correspondence: Professor RS Houlston, Section of Cancer Genetics, Brookes Lawley Building, Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5 NG, UK. Tel: +44 0 20 8722 4175; Fax: +44 0 20 8722 4359; E-mail: Richard.Houlston@icr.ac.uk
Received 9 December 2008; Revised 16 March 2009; Accepted 23 April 2009; Published online 27 May 2009.
Abstract
Genome scans based on gene-centric single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been proposed as an efficient approach to identify disease-causing variants that is complementary to scans based on tagging SNPs. Adopting this approach to identify low-penetrance susceptibility alleles for colorectal cancer (CRC) we analysed genotype data from 9109 gene-centric SNPs, 7014 of which were non-synonymous (nsSNPs), in 2873 cases and 2871 controls using Illumina iselect arrays. Overall the distribution of associations was not significantly different from the null. No SNP achieved globally significant association after correction for multiple testing (lowest P value 1.7
10-4, rs727299). We then analysed the dataset incorporating information on the functional consequences of nsSNPs. We used results from the in silico algorithm PolyPhen as prior information to weight the association statistics, with weights estimated from the observed test statistics within predefined groups of SNPs. Incorporating this information did not, however, yield any further evidence of a specific association (lowest P value 2.2
10-4, rs1133950). There was a strong relationship between effect size and SNPs predicted to be damaging (P=1.63
10-5), however, these variants which are most likely to impact on risk are rare (MAF<5%). Hence although the rationale for searching for low-penetrance cancer susceptibly alleles by conducting genome-wide scans of coding changes is strong, in practice it is likely that natural selection has rendered such alleles to be too rare to be detected by association studies of the size employed.
Keywords:
polymorphism, cancer, risk
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
A gene-centric approach to genome-wide association studies
Nature Reviews Genetics Perspective (01 Nov 2006)
RESEARCH
To what extent do scans of non-synonymous SNPs complement denser genome-wide association studies?
European Journal of Human Genetics Article Response
Evaluating coverage of genome-wide association studies
Nature Genetics Letter (01 Jun 2006)
Association scan of 14,500 nonsynonymous SNPs in four diseases identifies autoimmunity variants
Nature Genetics Article (01 Nov 2007)
Natural selection has driven population differentiation in modern humans
Nature Genetics Letter (01 Mar 2008)

