Article

European Journal of Human Genetics (2008) 16, 913–920; doi:10.1038/ejhg.2008.29; published online 27 February 2008

Experience and outcome of 3 years of a European EQA scheme for genetic testing of the spinocerebellar ataxias

Sara Seneca1, Michael A Morris2, Simon Patton3, Rob Elles3 and Jorge Sequeiros4

  1. 1Center of Medical Genetics, University Hospital Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
  2. 2Laboratoire de Diagnostic Moléculaire, Service de Médecine Génétique, University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
  3. 3European Molecular Genetics Quality Network (EMQN), National Genetics Reference Laboratory, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
  4. 4UnIGENe and CGPP, IBMC – Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular and ICBAS, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

Correspondence: Dr J Sequeiros, Universidade do Porto, UNIGENE – IBMC, R Campo Alegre 823, Porto 4150-180, Portugal. Tel: +351 22 607 4942; Fax: +351 22 600 2923; E-mail: jsequeir@ibmc.up.pt

Received 12 November 2007; Revised 20 December 2007; Accepted 17 January 2008; Published online 27 February 2008.

Top

Abstract

The European Molecular Genetics Quality Network (EMQN) has been organizing an external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for molecular genetic testing of trinucleotide repeat mutations in the spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) since 2004. DNA samples were validated by at least two independent labs and two different methods. Together with mock clinical case descriptions and requests for specific SCA gene analyses, these were sent to registered participants each year. Laboratories were asked to use their routine procedures and protocols. A panel of assessors reviewed the final returns, including genotype results and reports, to assess the quality of (1) genotyping and (2) interpretation and reporting. A description of methods and raw data were also requested and were very useful for the final analysis. Altogether, during 3 years, 239 reports were received from the laboratories. Overall genotype error rate ranged 1.1–5.2%, a significant cause of concern. Scores for interpretation and reporting also showed that there is still much room for progress, although performance has improved over this period of assessment. The consequences of suboptimal laboratory practices, genotyping errors and misdiagnosis and of incorrect or incomplete interpretation and reporting have wide implications for patient lives, as well as for health management and counselling of relatives. EQA schemes are an important part of quality assurance in molecular genetic laboratories, and their use should become a routine part of laboratory diagnostic practice. Current evidence shows also that it is important that laboratories participate on a yearly basis and that this becomes mandatory for reference laboratories.

Keywords:

EMQN, proficiency testing, quality assurance, SCA, ataxia

Top

MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS

These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated

NEWS AND VIEWS

Are linkage studies boring?

Nature Genetics News and Views (01 Jul 1993)

Trinucleotide repeats and hereditary ataxias

Nature Medicine News and Views (01 Feb 1997)

Extra navigation

.

naturejobs

ADVERTISEMENT