Article
European Journal of Human Genetics (2006) 14, 831–837. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201617; published online 12 April 2006
Parental and chromosomal origins of microdeletion and duplication syndromes involving 7q11.23, 15q11-q13 and 22q11
N Simon Thomas1,2, Miranda Durkie2, Gemma Potts2, Richard Sandford2, Berendine Van Zyl2, Sheila Youings2, Nicholas R Dennis3 and Patricia A Jacobs1,2
- 1Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, UK
- 2Division of Human Genetics, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- 3Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK
Correspondence: Dr N Simon Thomas, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury SP2 8BJ, UK. Tel: +44 1722 429080; Fax: +44 1722 338095; E-mail: simon.thomas@salisbury.nhs.uk
Received 22 December 2005; Revised 14 February 2006; Accepted 23 February 2006; Published online 12 April 2006.
Abstract
Non-allelic homologous recombination between chromosome-specific LCRs is the most common mechanism leading to recurrent microdeletions and duplications. To look for locus-specific differences, we have used microsatellites to determine the parental and chromosomal origins of a large series of patients with de novo deletions of chromosome 7q11.23 (Williams syndrome), 15q11–q13 (Angelman syndrome, Prader–Willi syndrome) and 22q11 (Di George syndrome) and duplications of 15q11–q13. Overall the majority of rearrangements were interchromosomal, so arising from unequal meiotic exchange, and there were approximately equal numbers of maternal and paternal deletions. Duplications and deletions of 15q11–q13 appear to be reciprocal products that arise by the same mechanisms. The proportion arising from interchromosomal exchanges varied among deletions with 22q11 the highest and 15q11–q13 the lowest. However, parental and chromosomal origins were not always independent. For 15q11–q13, maternal deletions tended to be interchromosomal while paternal deletions tended to be intrachromosomal; for 22q11 there was a possible excess of maternal cases among intrachromosomal deletions. Several factors are likely to be involved in the formation of recurrent rearrangements and the relative importance of these appear to be locus-specific.
Keywords:
microdeletion and duplication, parental origin, chromosomal origin, unequal meiotic exchange
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
From microscopes to microarrays: dissecting recurrent chromosomal rearrangements
Nature Reviews Genetics Review (01 Nov 2007)
NEWS AND VIEWS
Genomic rearrangements in the spotlight
Nature Genetics News and Views (01 Jan 2008)
KVLQT1, the rhythm of imprinting
Nature Genetics News and Views (01 Feb 1997)
RESEARCH
Group founding and breeding structure in the subsocial spider Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae)
Heredity Original Article
Nature Genetics Letter (01 Jan 2000)

