European Journal of Human Genetics

TABLE 2

FROM:

A comparison of different metaphase CGH methods for the detection of cryptic chromosome aberrations of defined size

Jacqueline Schoumans, Kate Nielsen, Iben Jeppesen, Britt-Marie Anderlid, Elisabeth Blennow, Karen Brøndum-Nielsen and Magnus Nordenskjöld

BACK TO ARTICLE

Table 2. CGH result

Case Karyotype Chromosome imbalances Detection method Size (Mb) ULS labeling Quips software Nicktranslation HR-CGH software Nicktranslation quips software ULS labeling HR-CGH software
146,XY,der(7)t(7;10)(q35;q25.3)Monosomy 7qS13.2DDD
  Trisomy 10q 19.1DDD
246,XY,der(18)t(13;18)(q33.3;p11.31)Monosomy 18pT5.8DDD
  Trisomy 13q 5.9DNDD
346,XY,der(21)t(9;21)(q33.3;q22.3)Monosomy 21qT2.5DND
  Trisomy 9q 11.2DD
446;XY,der(12)t(12;17)(q24.33;q25.3)Trisomy 17qT1.3NDNDND
  Monosomy 12q 2.1DNDD
546,XX,der(4)t(2;4)(q36.1;q34.3)Monosomy 4qT8.7DD
  Trisomy 2q 20.5DD
646,XX,rec(6)dup(6p)inv(6)(p23q27)Monosomy 6qT3.5DNDND
  Trisomy 6p 14.7DDD
746,XX,del(15)(q23q25.1)deletion 15q24Ta 10.3DD
846,XX,del(6)(p25.3 right arrow pter)deletion 6pT1.8DNDND
946,XY,del(22)(q11.21q11.21)Deletion 22q11.2M2.5NDND
1046,XY,del(17)(p11.2p11.2)[30]/46,XY[20]Deletion 17p11M3.6DDD
1146,XX,del(10)(q25.1;q25.3)Deletion 10q25H8.1DD
1246,XY,del(4)(p16.1 right arrow pter)Deletion 4pM6.9DD
1346,XX,del(15)(q11q13)Deletion 15q11–q13Mapprox4b DD
1446,XX, der(9)t(9;22)(q34.2;q13.31)Monosomy 9qT4.1DNDDND
  Trisomy 22q 5.7NDNDNDND
1546,XX,del(1)(p36.23 right arrow pter)Deletion 1pT8DD
1646,XX,der(13)t(5;13)(q35.2;q34)Monosomy 13qT3.9DNDDND
  Trisomy 5q 6.5DDDD
1746,XX,der(13)t(2;13)(p25.3;q32.1)Monosomy 13qT19.6DD
  Trisomy 2p 3.5NDND

 S=SKY; T=subtelomeric FISH; M=microdeletion FISH; H=HR-CGH; D=detected; ND=not detected, -not performed.

a Control probe was deleted.

b  bData from literature.

BACK TO ARTICLE