European Journal of Human Genetics

FIGURE 4

FROM:

A comparison of different metaphase CGH methods for the detection of cryptic chromosome aberrations of defined size

Jacqueline Schoumans, Kate Nielsen, Iben Jeppesen, Britt-Marie Anderlid, Elisabeth Blennow, Karen Brøndum-Nielsen and Magnus Nordenskjöld

BACK TO ARTICLE

Figure 4.

Figure and tables index
Unfortunately we are unable to provide accessible alternative text for this. If you require assistance to access this image, please contact help@nature.com or the author

CGH profile of case 8, DNA sample labeled by ULS® and analyzed with the Quips software CGH. A 1.8 Mb deletion on 6p is visible using a threshold of 1.10–0.90. No false-positive results were observed on other chromosome regions. Repetitive sequences were incompletely blocked by Cot-1 DNA on chromosome 1, 9, 13 and 15.

Figure and tables index
BACK TO ARTICLE