Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Food and health

The Danish tax on saturated fat: why it did not survive

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

Health promoters have repeatedly proposed using economic policy tools, taxes and subsidies, as a means of changing consumer behaviour. As the first country in the world, Denmark introduced a tax on saturated fat in 2011. It was repealed in 2012. In this paper, we present arguments and themes involved in the debates surrounding the introduction and the repeal.

Subjects/Methods:

An analysis of parliamentary debates, expert reports and media coverage; key informant interviews; and a review of studies about the effects of the tax on consumer behaviour.

Results:

A tax on saturated fat had been suggested by two expert committees and was introduced with a majority in parliament, as a part of a larger economic reform package. Many actors, including representatives from the food industry and nutrition researchers, opposed the tax both before and after its introduction, claiming that it harmed the economy and had no positive influence on health, rather the contrary. Few policy actors defended the tax. Public health had a prominent role in the politicians’ arguments for introducing the tax but was barely mentioned in the debate about the repeal. Shortly after the repeal of the tax, research was published showing that consumption of saturated fat had declined in Denmark.

Conclusions:

The analysis indicates that the Danish tax on fat was introduced mainly to increase public revenue. As the tax had no strong proponents and many influential adversaries, it was repealed. New research indicates that the tax was effective in changing consumer behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Purchase on Springer Link

Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO Development of the first food and nutrition action plan for the WHO European region: Report on a WHO Consultation, 8–10 November 1999 Malta.WHO/Regional office for Europe; Copenhagen, Denmark 2000.

  2. Chouinard H, Davis D, LaFrance J, Perloff J . Fat taxes: big money for small change. Forum Health Econ Policy 2007; 10: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mytton O, Gray A, Rayner M, Rutter H . Could targeted food taxes improve health? J Epidemiol Commun Health 2007; 61: 689–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Powell LM, Chaloupka FJ . Food prices and obesity: evidence and policy implications for taxes and subsidies. Milbank Q 2009; 87: 229–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Franck C, Grandi SM, Eisenberg MJ . Taxing junk food to counter obesity. Am J Public Health 2013; 103: 1949–1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rochefort DA, Cobb RW . Problem definition, agenda access, and policy choice. Policy Stud J 1993; 21: 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gusfield JR . The culture of public problems. In: Gusfield JR (eds). The Culture of Public Problems Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1981, pp 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forebyggelseskommisionen. Vi kan leve længere og sundere. Forebyggelseskommissionens anbefalinger ti en styrket forebyggende indsats. [Disease Prevention Commission. We Can Live Longer and Healthier. The Recommendations of the Disease Prevention Commission], Forebyggelseskommisionen: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2009.

  9. Working Group. Økonomiske virkemidler i ernæringspolitikken - et brugbart værktøj i indsatsen mod fedme og dårlig ernæring? Akademiet for de Tekniske Videnskaber: København [Working Group. Economic Instruments in Nutrition Policies - A Useful Tool Towards Obesity and Poor Nutrition?] The Academy of Technical Sciences: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2007.

  10. Nexø SA, Koch L . Discourse analysis. In: Vallgårda S, Koch L eds Research Methods on Public Health. Gyldendal Akademisk: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2008, pp 121–42.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rieke RD, Sillars MO . Argumentation and the Decision Making Process, 2nd edn. Scott, Foresman and Company: Glenview, IL, USA, 2009.

  12. Pedersen A, Fagt S, Groth MV, Christensen T, Biltoft-Jensen A, Matthiessen J et al. Danskernes kostvaner 2003–2008. Hovedresultater [The Danes' Eatinghabits 2003–2008. Main Results]. Fødevareinstituttet, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet: Søborg, Denmark, 2010.

  13. Forårspakke 2.0: Vækst, klima, lavere skat [Springpackage 2.0: Growth, Climate, Lower Tax]. Regeringen: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2009.

  14. Folketinget. Skriftlig fremsættelse af fedtafgiftsloven L 111. Folketingstidende A. 2011; 2010-11 1. samling. [Minutes from the Danish Parliament. Proposal of Fat Tax Bill].

  15. Folketinget. Forslag til Lov om afgift af mættet fedt i visse fødevarer (Fedtafgiftsloven). Lovforslag nr. L 111. Folketingstidende A. 2011; 2010-111. samling. [Minutes from the Danish Parliament. Proposal of a Tax on Saturated Fat].

  16. Kjær JS, Regeringen sylter faglighed i ny fedtskat. [The Government Shelves Professional Considerations with New Fat Tax]. Politiken; 16 November 2010.

  17. Hoffman T . Fedtskat undermineret af ny forskning. [Fat Tax Undermined by New Research]. Videnskabdk; 7 February 2011.

  18. Simonsen TR . Dansk fedtskat skudt ned. Der er ikke skyggen af bevis [The Danish Fat Tax. There is not the Slightest Shadow of a Proof]. (Mejeriernes konference); ingdk. 25 September 2009.

  19. Bredsdorff M. Kritikere: Regeringen beskatter det forkerte fedt. [Critics: The Government Taxes the Wrong Sort of Fat]; ingdk. 12 March 2010.

  20. Tholstrup T, Lauridsen L, Astrup A . Væk med fedtskatten – den er farlig. [Remove The Fat Tax - It is Dangerous]. Berlingske, 2009.

  21. Larsen LE, Larsen CK, Efterlysning: viden om mættet fedt. [SOS Message - Knowledge About Saturated Fat]. Berlingske; 16 March 2010.

  22. Macdonald C. Fedtafgiften under beskydning. [The Fat Tax under Attack]. Berlingske; 8 October 2010.

  23. Tuborgh P . Fedtafgift bygger på forældet forskning. [The Fat Tax is Built on Obsolete Research]. Berlingske; 17 September 2011.

  24. Kjær JS . Ny fedtskat rammer de svageste. [New Fat Tax Hits the Most Vulnerable]. Politiken; 18 october 2010.

  25. Rasmussen LI . Underernærede patinter fedtbeskattes. [Undernourished Patients are Fattaxed]. Ugeskrift for læger; 2010, 172: 2922.

  26. Himmelstrup K . Fedtafgift koster 17 øre pr. kg mælk. [The Fat Tax Costs 17 øre per Kilogramme Milk]. Landbrugsavisen; 10 April 2009.

  27. Dansk Industri. 7 February 2011.

  28. Grünbaum B . Endnu en administrativ byrde for erhvervslivet. [Yet Another Administrative Burden on the Trades and Industries]. Jyllandsposten; 9 December 2010.

  29. Rehn N . Landbrug presser V og K for at få fedtafgift fjernet. [The Agricultural Sector Presses the Liberal and the Conservative Parties to Remove the Fat Tax]. Politiken; 24 August 2012.

  30. Mikkelsen BE, Hansen PG . Historien om afgifterne, der forsvandt. [The History about the Taxes that Dissapeared]. In Information; 7 January 2013.

  31. Mejeriforeningen. Forslaget er katastrofalt for en trængt branche. [The Proposal is a Catastrophy for a Hard-Pressed Trade]. Berlingske; 25 February 2009.

  32. Flensburg T . Afgift på fedt er en god idé. [Fat Tax is a Good Idea]. Politiken; 1 October 2011.

  33. Pedersen FS . Fedtafgift og billigere light sodavand skal gøre os sundere. [A Fat Tax and Cheaper Light Soda Will Make Us More Healthy]. Berlingske; 15 Febraury 2009.

  34. Søndergaard M . Sukker- og fedtafgift rammer enlige med børn [Sugar- and Fat Tax Burdens Single Parents] Foodculture.dk, 2012.

  35. Pedersen MK, Larsen LE . Fedtskat er ikke forebyggelse. [A Fat Tax is not Prevention]. In Information; 6 December 2011.

  36. Kjær JS . Ny fedtskat gør rugbrød og magert kød dyrere. [New Tax on Fat Will Make Rye Bread and Lean Meat More Expensive]. Politiken; 15 November 2010.

  37. Folketinget. Forslag til Lov om ophævelse om afgift af elektricitet, ligningsloven, personskatteloven med flere love. [Minutes from the Danish Parliament. Proposal of a Bill on Repeals of Tax on Electricity, Act on Tax Assessment, Act on Personal Taxes and Other Acts. Folketingstidende A, 2012.

  38. Smed S, Robertson A . Blindebuk. Ingen ved, om fedtskatten virker. [Nobody Knows if the Fat Tax Has an Effect]. Politiken; 9 September 2012.

  39. Madsen K . Nekrolog over den forhadte fedtskat. [Obituary on the Hated Tax on Fat]. Politiken; 14 November 2012.

  40. Jensen JD, Smed S . The Danish tax on saturated fat—short run effects on consumption, substitution patterns and consumer prices of fat. Food Policy 2013; 42: 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hansen MK . Fedtspil om afgifter. [Games on Taxes]. Ugeskrift for læger 2012; 174: 2827.

  42. Læger om skrottede afgifter: Sundheden er på spil. [Physicians on the Trashed Taxes: Health is at Stake]. Politiken; 10 November 2012.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Vallgårda.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vallgårda, S., Holm, L. & Jensen, J. The Danish tax on saturated fat: why it did not survive. Eur J Clin Nutr 69, 223–226 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.224

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.224

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links