Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Maternal perception of the causes and consequences of sibling differences in eating behaviour

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 64, pages 1316–1322 (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

The aim of this study is to explore mothers’ perceptions of differences between their children in the eating behaviour domain.

Subjects/Methods:

Twelve semistructured interviews were carried out with mothers who had at least two children aged between 6 and 15 years, to discuss feeding experiences, particularly around healthy eating. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and analysed using Framework Analysis.

Results:

Mothers frequently identified differences in appetite and food preferences between their children, which they attributed largely to genetic factors. These sibling differences meant that although feeding goals might be common, the pathways to the goals varied depending on each child's appetitive characteristics. The overall pattern was one of flexible responsiveness to each child. In contrast to perceptions of their own children's eating behaviours, feeding difficulties in other families were usually attributed to lack of parental control.

Conclusions:

The feeding relationship is complex and interactive, resulting in parents modulating their feeding strategies to match each child's eating behaviour. Guidance to parents on healthy feeding needs to acknowledge the nuanced and interactive nature of feeding practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baughcum AE, Burklow KA, Deeks CM, Powers SW, Whitaker RC (1998). Maternal feeding practices and childhood obesity a focus group study of low-Income mothers. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 152, 1010–1014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birch LL, Birch D, Marlin DW, Kramer L (1982). Effects of instrumental consumption on children's food preference. Appetite 3, 125–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birch LL (1998). Development of food acceptance patterns in the first years of life. Proceedings Nutr Soc 57, 617–624.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birch LL, Fisher JO (2000). Mothers’ child-feeding practices influence daughters’ eating and weight. Am J Clin Nutr 71, 1054–1061.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birch LL, Fisher JO, Davison KK (2003). Learning to overeat: maternal use of restrictive feeding practices promotes girls’ eating in the absence of hunger. Am J Clin Nutr 78, 215–220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birch LL, Marlin DW, Rotter J (1984). Eating as the means activity in a contingency—effects on young childrens food preference. Child Dev 55, 431–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch LL, Zimmerman S, Hind H (1980). The influence of social-affective context on the formation of children's food preferences. Child Dev 51, 856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blissett J, Farrow C (2007). Predictors of maternal control of feeding at 1 and 2 years of age. Int J Obes 31, 1520–1526.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blissett J, Meyer C, Haycraft E (2006). Maternal and paternal controlling feeding practices with male and female children. Appetite 47, 212–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnell S, Haworth CM, Plomin R, Wardle J (2008). Genetic influence on appetite in children. Int J Obes 32, 1468–1473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cecil JE, Palmer CNA, Fischer B, Watt P, Wallis DJ, Murrie I et al. (2007). Variants of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma- and beta-adrenergic receptor genes are associated with measures of compensatory eating behaviors in young children. Am J Clin Nutr 86, 167–173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Croker H, Sweetman C, Cooke L (2009). Mothers’ views on portion sizes for children. J Hum Nutr Diet 22, 437–443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker RR, Hammer LD, Agras WS, Bryson S (1999). Can mothers influence their child's eating behavior? J Dev Behav Pediatr 20, 88–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farrow CV, Galloway AT, Fraser K (2009). Sibling eating behaviours and differential child feeding practices reported by parents. Appetite 52, 307–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher JO, Birch L (1999a). Restricting access to palatable foods affects children's behavioral response, food selection, and intake. Am J Clin Nutr 69, 1264–1272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher JO, Birch LL (1996). Maternal restriction of young girls’ food access is related to intake of those foods in an unrestricted setting. FASEB J 10, 1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher JO, Birch LL (1999b). Restricting access to foods and children's eating. Appetite 32, 405–419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher JO, Birch LL (2002). Eating in the absence of hunger and overweight in girls from 5 to 7 y of age. Am J Clin Nutr 76, 226–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher JO, Cai GW, Jaramillo SJ, Cole SA, Comuzzie AG, Butte NF (2007). Heritability of hyperphagic eating behavior and appetite-related hormones among Hispanic children. Obesity 15, 1484–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher JO, Mitchell DC, Smiciklas-Wright H, Birch LL (2002). Parental influences on young girls’ fruit and vegetable, micronutrient, and fat intakes. J Amer Diet Assoc 102, 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis LA, Hofer SM, Birch LL (2001). Predictors of maternal child-feeding style: maternal and child characteristics. Appetite 37, 231–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heider F (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Wiley: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Himelstein S, Graham S, Weiner B (1991). An attributional analysis of maternal beliefs about the importance of child-rearing practices. Child Dev 62, 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser L, Melgar-Qidonez HR, Lamp CL, Johns MC, Harwood JO (2001). Acculturation of Mexican-American mothers influences child feeding strategies. J Amer Diet Assoc 101, 542–547.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landis J, Koch G (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn CH, van Jaarsveld CHM, Boniface D, Carnell S, Wardle J (2008). Eating rate is a heritable phenotype related to weight in children. Amer J Clin Nutr 88, 1560–1566.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J (1986). Exploring the experiences of women managers: towards rigour in qualitative methods. In: Wilkinson S (ed). Feminist social psychology: Developing theory and practice. OUP: Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillicuddy-DeLisi AA (1982). The relationship between parents’ beliefs about development and family constellation, socioeconomic status, and parents’ teaching strategies. In LaosaI L, Sigel I (eds). Families as Learning Environments for Children. Plenum: New York, pp 261–299.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moens E, Braet C, Soetens B (2007). Observation of family functioning at mealtime: a comparison between families of children with and without overweight. J Pediatr Psychol 32, 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery C, Jackson K, Kelly L, Reilly J (2006). Parental feeding style, energy intake and weight status in young Scottish children. Br J Nutr 6, 1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore SN, Tapper K, Murphy S (2007). Feeding strategies used by mothers of 3-5-year-old children. Appetite 49, 704–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore SN, Tapper K, Murphy S (2010). Feeding goals sought by mothers of 3-5-year-old children. Brit J Health Psych 15, 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orrell-Valente JK, Hill LG, Brechwald WA, Dodge KA, Pettit GS, Bates JE (2007). ‘Just three more bites’: an observational analysis of parents’ socialization of children's eating at mealtime. Appetite 48, 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park B, Smith JA, Correll J (2008). ‘Having it all’ or ‘doing it all’? Perceived trait attributes and behavioral obligations as a function of workload, parenthood, and gender. Eur J Soc Psych 38, 1156–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin R (1990). Nature and Nurture: An Introduction to Human Behavioral Genetics. Brooks & Cole: Pacific Grove, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power TG, Bindler RC, Goetz S, Darratha KB (2010). Obesity prevention in early adolescence: student, parent, and teacher views. J School Health 80, 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J, Spencer L (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Byman A, Burgess RG (eds). Analyzing Qualitative Data. Routledge: London. pp 173–195.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J, Lewis J, O'Connor G (2003). Analysis: Practices, Principles and Processes. In: J Ritchie, J Lewis (eds). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozin P (1989). The role of learning in the acquisition of food preferences by humans. In: Shephed R (edn). Handbook of the Psychophysiology of Human Eating. Wiley: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry B, McDivitt J, Birch L, Cook F, Sanders S, Prish J et al. (2004). Attitudes, practices, and concerns about child feeding and child weight status among socioeconomically diverse white, Hispanic, and African-American mothers. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Osborn M (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith J (edn). Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research, (2nd edn). SAGE: Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spruijt-Metz D (2002). Relation between mothers’ child-feeding practices and children's adiposity. Am J Clin Nutr 75, 581.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm LA, Drotar D, Laing K, Zimet G (1997). Mothers’ beliefs about the causes of infant growth deficiency: is there attributional bias? J Pediatr Psychol 22, 329–344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle J, Carnell S, Cooke L (2005). Parental control over feeding and children's fruit and vegetable intake: how are they related? J Am Diet Assoc 105, 227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber L, Cooke L, Hill C, Wardle J (2010). Associations between children's appetitive traits and maternal feeding practices. J Am Diet Assoc, (In press April 2010).

  • Webber L, Hill C, Saxton J, Van Jaarsveld H, Wardle J (2009). Eating behaviour and weight in children. Int J Obes 33, 21–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support from Cancer Research UK (grant C1418/A6124) for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK

    L Webber, L Cooke & J Wardle

Authors
  1. L Webber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L Cooke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J Wardle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Wardle.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Webber, L., Cooke, L. & Wardle, J. Maternal perception of the causes and consequences of sibling differences in eating behaviour. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 1316–1322 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.159

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.159

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links