Original Article
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2008) 62, 1282–1286; doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602847; published online 25 July 2007
Evaluation of air-displacement plethysmography and bioelectrical impedance analysis vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of fat-free mass in elderly subjects
Guarantors: S Bertoli and G Bedogni.
Contributors: SB and AB enrolled subjects, performed measurements and contributed to the final version of the manuscript; GT coordinated the study; GB analyzed the data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript.
S Bertoli1, A Battezzati1, G Testolin1 and G Bedogni2
- 1International Centre for the Assessment of Nutritional Status, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
- 2Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Liver Research Center, Trieste, Italy
Correspondence: Dr G Bedogni, Centro Studi Fegato, Building Q, AREA Science Park, Strada Statale 14/km 163.5, 34012 Basovizza, Trieste, Italy. E-mail: giorgiobedogni@gmail.com
Received 2 November 2006; Revised 13 June 2007; Accepted 14 June 2007; Published online 25 July 2007.
Abstract
Objective:
To evaluate air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for the assessment of fat-free mass (FFM) in healthy elderly subjects.
Subjects:
Forty-two women and twenty-six men aged 60–84 years.
Methods:
FFM was measured by DXA and ADP. Body impedance (Z) was measured by four-polar BIA and the impedance index (ZI) was calculated as stature2/Z. Selection of predictors (gender, age, weight and ZI at 5, 50 and 100 kHz) for BIA algorithms was carried out using bootstrapped stepwise linear regression on 1000 samples of 68 subjects. Limits of agreement were used as measures of interchangeability of ADP and BIA with DXA.
Results:
The limits of agreement of ADP vs DXA were -11.0 to 2.4 kg in males and -4.8 to 2.2 kg in females. Gender, weight and ZI100 were selected as predictors of FFM by bootstrapped stepwise linear regression. In males, ZI100 (-12.2 to 12.2 kg) was much less accurate than weight (-6.0 to 6.0 kg) at predicting FFM and their combination did not improve the estimate (-6.0 to 6.0 kg). In females, ZI100 (-6.8 to 6.8 kg) was less accurate than weight (-5.6 to 5.6 kg) at predicting FFM and their combination improved the estimate only slightly (-5.0 to 5.0 kg).
Conclusions:
In healthy elderly subjects, (1) ADP and DXA are not interchangeable for the assessment of FFM, especially in males; and (2) ZI100 is not superior to weight for the prediction of FFM and their combination is of little advantage and only in females.
Keywords:
elderly, body composition, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, air-displacement plethysmography, bioelectrical impedance analysis
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
REVIEWS
Changes in fat-free mass during significant weight loss: a systematic review
International Journal of Obesity Review
RESEARCH
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition Original Article
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition Original Article
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition Original Article
Body fat measurement in adolescent athletes: multicompartment molecular model comparison
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition Original Article
