Original Article
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2006) 60, 587–592. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602353; published online 7 December 2005
Family-based behavioural treatment of obesity: acceptability and effectiveness in the UK
Guarantor: J Wardle.
Contributors: JW directed the overall programme and supervised the data analysis, interpretation, drafting, and editing of the paper. CE was the principal investigator; she devised the intervention and design and was responsible for implementing the programme, data collection, data analysis, and drafting of the paper. DN contributed to the programme design, implementation, drafting of the paper, and took clinical responsibility for families. HC contributed to the programme design, implementation and editing of the paper. SZ contributed to the programme design, implementation, data collection, analysis, and drafting of the paper. RV was responsible for medical aspects of the programme, and contributed to the writing and editing of the paper.
C Edwards1, D Nicholls2, H Croker1, S Van Zyl3, R Viner2 and J Wardle1
- 1Cancer Research Health Behaviour Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
- 2Great Ormond Street Hospital, University College London, London, UK
- 3Department of Psychology, University College London, London, UK
Correspondence: Professor J Wardle, Cancer Research Health Behaviour Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT UK. E-mail: j.wardle@ucl.ac.uk
Received 12 April 2005; Revised 12 September 2005; Accepted 3 October 2005; Published online 7 December 2005.
Abstract
Objective:
To assess the acceptability and impact of family-based behavioural treatment (FBBT) for childhood obesity in a clinical setting in the UK.
Design:
Pre- and post-treatment assessment for four consecutive treatment groups.
Setting:
Treatment groups took place at Great Ormond Street Hospital, London.
Patients:
Participants were 33 families with obese (BMI 
98th centile for age and sex) children aged 8–13 years.
Intervention:
FBBT was delivered over 12 sessions.
Main outcome measures:
Overweight (percentage BMI), self-esteem, mood and eating attitudes were assessed before and after treatment; overweight was re-assessed at 3-month follow-up for those who completed treatment.
Results:
The FBBT programme materials translated easily to the UK setting and the programme was well-liked by participants. Twenty-seven out of 33 families (82%) completed the sessions. Children lost 8.4% BMI over the time of treatment, and this was maintained at 3-month follow-up. Self-esteem and depression improved significantly and there was no change in food pre-occupation, anorexia or bulimia on the ChEAT.
Conclusions:
These results establish that FBBT is feasible and acceptable in a clinical setting in Britain. They indicate that significant loss of overweight can be achieved using the programme without adverse psychological consequences.
Keywords:
obesity, treatment, behavioural, family
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS
These links to content published by NPG are automatically generated
RESEARCH
Crystal structure of human osteoclast cathepsin K complex with E-64
Nature Structural Biology Correspondence (01 Feb 1997)
Obesity Research Original Article
Modern Pathology Original Article
Changes in Obesity-related Attitudes in Women Seeking Weight Reduction *
Obesity Original Article
