Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Development and testing of a computerised 24-h recall questionnaire measuring fruit and snack consumption among 9–11 year olds

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 59, pages 809–816 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the validity, reliability and sensitivity of a computerised single day 24-h recall questionnaire designed for the comparison of children's fruit and snack consumption at the group (school) level.

Design:

Relative validity and reliability were assessed in relation to (i) intake at school and (ii) intake throughout the whole day, using diary-assisted 24-h recall interviews and a 7-day test–retest procedure. Sensitivity was assessed in relation to intake by comparing results from schools with differing food policies, and by sex.

Subjects and setting:

Eight schools took part in the validity and reliability assessments, with 78 children completing the 24-h recall interviews and 195 children completing the test–retest procedure. A total of 43 schools (1890 children) took part in the sensitivity analysis. All children were aged 9–11 y. All schools were in South Wales and South-west England.

Results:

For fruit intake at school, the questionnaire showed fair levels of validity at the individual level (kappa=0.29). At the group level, there were little or no differences in fruit intake at school between the two measures and two occasions. The questionnaire was sufficiently sensitive to identify statistically significant differences between girls and boys, and between schools with different food policies. For snack intake at school, validity at the individual level was slightly lower (kappa=0.22–0.25), but the data remained of value in analyses at the group level. For fruit and snack intake throughout the whole day there was little agreement at the individual level (kappa=0.00–0.06), and at the group level there tended to be substantial differences between the two measures and two occasions.

Conclusions:

The computerised questionnaire is a quick and cost-effective means of assessing children's consumption of fruit at school. While further development is required to improve validity and reliability, it has the potential to be particularly useful in randomised controlled trials of school-based dietary interventions.

Sponsorship:

The research was funded by the Food Standards Agency Food Acceptability and Choice research programme and the Health Promotion Division of the National Assembly for Wales. Laurence Moore is supported by a Public Health Career Scientist Award funded by the Welsh Assembly Government.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakker I, Twisk JWR, van Mechelen W, Mensink GBM & Kemper HCG (2003): Computerization of a dietary history interview in a running cohort; evaluation within the Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal Study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 57, 394–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baranowski T, Islam N, Baranowski J, Cullen KW, Myres D, Marsh T & de Moor C (2002): The food intake recording software system is valid among fourth-grade children. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 102, 380–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baranowski T, Smith M, Baranowski J, Wang DT, Doyle C, Lin LS, Hearn MD & Resnicow K (1997): Low validity of a seven-item fruit and vegetable food frequency questionnaire among third-grade students. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 97, 66–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter SD, Thompson WO & Davies HC (2000): Prompting methods affect the accuracy of children's school lunch results. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 100, 911–918.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byers T, Treiber F, Gunter E, Coates R, Sowell A, Leonard S, Mokdad A, Jewell S, Miller D, Serdula M & Strong W (1993): The accuracy of parental reports of their children's intake of fruits and vegetables: validation of a food frequency questionnaire with serum levels of carotenoids and vitamins C, A, and E. Epidemiology 4, 350–355.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D & Tyrer P (2000): Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br. Med. J. 321, 694–696.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers E, McGuire B, Godwin S, McDowell M & Vecchio F (2000): Quantifying portion sizes for selected snack foods and beverages in 24-hour dietary recalls. Nutr. Res. 20, 315–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craik F & Lockhart R (1972): Levels of processing. J Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen KW, Baranowski T & Baranowski J (1998): Computer software design for children's recording of food intake. J. Nutr. Educ. 30, 405–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson FR, Hayek LA & Altschul AM (1986): Towards accurate assessment of children's food consumption. Ecol. Food Nutr. 18, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Employment (2000): Regulations and Guidance for Nutritional Standards and School Lunches. London: DfEE Publications Centre.

  • Department of Health (2000a): The National School Fruit Scheme. London: The Department of Health.

  • Department of Health (2000b): National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Young People Aged 4 to 18 years. Volume 1: Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey. London: The Stationery Office.

  • Domel SB, Baranowski T, Davis H, Leonard SB, Riley P & Baranowski J (1994): Fruit and vegetable food frequences by fourth and fifth grade students: validity and reliability. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 13, 33–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds LD & Ziebland S (2002): Development and validation of the Day in the Life Questionnaire (DILQ) as a measure of fruit and vegetable questionnaire for 7-9 year olds. Health Educ. Res. 17, 211–220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaziano JM, Manson JE, Branch LG, Colditz GA, Willet WC & Burring JB (1995): A prospective study of consumption of caretenoids in fruit and vegetables and decreased cardiovascular mortality in the elderly. Ann. Epidemiol. 5, 255–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gillman MW, Cupples LA, Gagnon D, Posner B, Ellison RC, Castelli W & Wolf P (1995): Protective effect of fruits and vegetables on development of stroke in men. JAMA 273, 1113–1117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow City Council (2002, July): Fruit for Schools Initiative [On-line] Available:http://www.glasgow.gov.uk/html/council/dept/educ/fruits.htm.

  • Hackett AF, Jarvis SN & Flanaghan GH (1989): The feasibility of using school-based micro-computers to collect information on the health-related behaviour of children. Health Educ. J. 48, 39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert JR, Clemow L, Pbert L, Ockene IS & Ockene JK (1995): Social desirability bias in dietary self report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures. Int. J. Epidemiol. 24, 389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson B & Hackett AF (1997): Eating habits of 11-14-year-old school children living in less affluent areas of Liverpool, UK. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 10, 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Key TJA, Thorogood M, Appleby PN & Burr ML (1996): Dietary habits and mortality in 11 000 vegetarians and health conscious people: results of a 17 year follow up. Br. Med. J. 313, 775–779.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs-Smith SM, Heimendinger J, Subar AF, Patterson BH & Pivonka E (1995): Using food frequency questionnaires to estimate fruit and vegetable intake: association between the number of questions and total intakes. Soc. Nutr. Educ. 27, 80–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristal AR, Andrilla CHA, Koepsell TD, Diehr PH & Cheadle A (1998): Dietary assessment instruments are susceptible to intervention-associated response set bias. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 98, 40–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Landis JR & Koch GG (1977): The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159–174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone MBE & Robson PJ (2000): Measurement of dietary intake in children. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 59, 279–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lytle LA, Nichaman MZ, Obarzanek E, Glovsky E, Montgomery D, Nicklas T, Zive M & Feldman H (1993): Validation of 24-hour recalls assisted by food records in third-grade children. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 93, 1431–1436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson RS, Hoelscher DM, Alxander M, Scanlon KS & Serdula MK (2000): Dietary assessment methods among school-aged children: validity and reliability. Prev. Med. 31, S11–S33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore L, Paisley C & Dennehy A (2000): Are Fruit Tuck Shops in Primary Schools Effective in Increasing Students’ Fruit Consumption? A randomised controlled trial. Nutr. Food Sci. 30 (1), 35–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny JA, Rumpler WV, Judd JT, Riddick H, Rhodes D, McDowell M & Briefel R (2001): Diet interviews of subject pairs: how different persons recall eating the same foods. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 101, 1189–1193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poppitt SD, Swann D, Black AE & Prentice AM (1998): Assessment of selective under-reporting of food intake by both obese and non-obese women in a metabolic facility. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 22, 303–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp (1999): Stata Statistical Software: Release 6.0. User's Guide. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.

  • Steinmetz KA & Potter JD (1996): Vegetables, fruit and cancer prevention: a review. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 96, 1027–1039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson FE & Byers T (1994): Dietary resource assessment manual. J. Nutr. 124, 2245S–2317S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Health and Human Services (1996): Healthy People 2000: Midcourse Review and 1995 Revisions. Washington, DC: Public Health Service.

  • Williams C (1997): Recommendations and current consumption patterns: how big is the gap? In At Least Five a Day. Strategies to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption ed. I Sharp, pp. 19–34. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Claire Paisley advised on the validation methodology. We gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of all schools participating in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiff Institute of Society, Health and Ethics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

    L Moore & K Tapper

  2. Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    A Dennehy

  3. Department of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    A Cooper

Authors
  1. L Moore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K Tapper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A Dennehy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A Cooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L Moore.

Additional information

Guarantor: L Moore.

Contributors: LM, AC and AD developed and piloted the computerised questionnaire; LM and KT undertook data analysis and drafted the paper. All authors contributed to finalisation of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moore, L., Tapper, K., Dennehy, A. et al. Development and testing of a computerised 24-h recall questionnaire measuring fruit and snack consumption among 9–11 year olds. Eur J Clin Nutr 59, 809–816 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602146

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602146

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links